RJGlass | America@Large wrote:
> -Individuals should predominately represented
> -organizational membership within an ALS should be OK
> -this conversation is inflammatory
> -individual at-large membership should be either a) put into a
> subgroup or b) referred to an ALS
And I'm agreed with Randy on all points.
I would also make explicit that in the case of orgs-within-orgs, the
participating subgroups must themselves be membership bodies similar to
the existing requirement of ALSs. I wouldn't want this to be used as a
backdoor to allow in groups that otherwise would not qualify for acceptance.
- Evan
_______________________________________________
NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
---
Draft MoU with ICANN:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
Draft Operating Principles:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP