HI John,

As said yesterday.  It should be an alternate. In fact, At large is now 
requiring both a primary and a secondary alternative for each ALS.  In some 
cases they are even asking for two alternates. Please modify the document to 
include this

Best,

Judith

Judith Hellerstein, Founder & CEO
Hellerstein & Associates
3001 Veazey Terrace NW, Washington DC 20008
Phone: (202) 362-5139  Skype ID: judithhellerstein
Mobile/Whats app: +1202-333-6517
E-mail: Judith@jhellerstein.com   Website: www.jhellerstein.com
Linked In: www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/
Opening Telecom & Technology Opportunities Worldwide

On 3/29/2017 2:32 PM, John More wrote:
 Good point. The question is whether it should be a proxy or an alternative, or both.

 John More

 On Mar 29, 2017, at 2:20 PM, Gordon Chillcott <gordontc@look.ca> wrote:

 I've noticed that 3.2 of the proposed ROP requires each ALS to select
 one "voting representative".

 There does not seem to be any allowance for a designated proxy in cases
 where the voting representative is temporarily unable to act for any
 reason.

 In my own case, for example, I am not able to attend the upcoming
 General Assembly and my ALS has designated another representative.

 Gordon Chillcott

 ------
 NA-Discuss mailing list
 NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
 https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss

 Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
 ------
 ------
 NA-Discuss mailing list
 NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
 https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss

 Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
 ------

------
NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss

Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
------