Could we have a Working Group for Internet resources??
Nick did a great job in setting all this up. Some of us probably remember the annual 'quarterly newsletter' and what we have now is so much better. However I think it's too confusing to keep up with which sites we use for what. Just keeping up with the email list is a chore. I think it should be streamlined in some manner.
Randy Glass
A@L
On 7/5/07, Nick Ashton-Hart <nick.ashton-hart@icann.org> wrote:
On 4 Jul 2007, at 18:05, Jean Armour Polly wrote:
> At 8:37 AM +0100 7/4/07, Nick Ashton-Hart recently said:
>> As the Committee has been repeatedly informed, the situation is
>> that anyone being paid by ICANN must have anything they post
>> publicly approved via the GCs office.
>
> What if the webmaster just posted things FROM the committee, from
> volunteers, would that be OK? In addition, I used to make pointers
> to news stories around ICANN.org itself, to make documents easier
> for ALAC members to find. And occasionally I pointed to other posts
> about other things, like conferences in the Caribbean, ISP
> providers in Africa, etc. There is a difference in these sorts of
> tasks, as opposed to acting as a "speaker" for ICANN.
>
No - it would still need to be cleared through legal if the poster
was paid by ICANN.
_______________________________________________
NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
---
Draft MoU with ICANN:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
Draft Operating Principles:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP
Draft Code of Conduct:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct
--
-------------------------
AmericaAtLarge.org
RJPacific.com
DDMF.org