bfausett@internet.law.pro wrote:
> As the Chair, I'd
rather not pick someone. The original goal of the draft
> was to avoid
voting altogether, since that's a rat hole too, as we have
> various
organizations of unequal size. On the first draft, we had passed
> "no
consensus" situations to the Nominating Committee for resolution, but
> I
seem to recall that ICANN rejected that option for some reason. If it's
>
a decision between "chair picks" and "voting," however, I'd go with
>
voting. Are there any options we hadn't considered?
>
How
about... a conventional vote is taken, but the Chair casts an extra
vote in
case of a tie.
Alternately, the chair doesn't vote _unless_ there's a
tie.
-
Evan
_______________________________________________
NA-Discuss
mailing list
NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
---
Draft
MoU with ICANN:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
Draft
Operating Principles:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP