Message-ID: <46893141.7040506@ipjustice.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 10:09:21 -0700
From: Robin Gross <robin@ipjustice.org>
Reply-To: robin@ipjustice.org
Organization: IP Justice
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US;
	rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dharma Dailey <dharma@ethoswireless.com>
CC: Annette Muehlberg <annette.muehlberg@web.de>,  evan@telly.org,
	rguerra@privaterra.org,  na-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] limericks
References: <4688F8D5.9060300@web.de>
	<CE8A0E4D-0E68-4558-A94C-711779737603@ethoswireless.com>
In-Reply-To: <CE8A0E4D-0E68-4558-A94C-711779737603@ethoswireless.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks for sending these - they are really funny!

I sent them on to the NCUC list for further amusement.

Thanks again!
Robin


Dharma Dailey wrote:

> Back by popular demand....  the ICANN Limerick treasures of Andy & =20
> Annie McNonymous:
>
> An international dude
>
> Was in a rather foul mood
>
> He asked for domains
>
> You gave him plantains
>
> He could only eat multi-byte food
>
>
>
> There once was a girl from Nantuck,
>
> Who wanted to sponsor dot-fuck.
>
> =93No, No!=94 said the GAC(k),
>
> =93You must take a step back.
>
> Consensus is not bottom up.=94
>
>
>
> Civil action groups rarely have luck
>
> When their causes are dragged through the muck.
>
> When the lawyers are done,
>
> the result=92s not much fun.
>
> Makes participants moan, =93what the heck?=94
>
>
>
> A registry asked of the Board
>
> To correct problems ignored
>
> To get a domain
>
> Is a source of great pain
>
> But ICANN wouldn=92t open its hoard.
>
>
>
> ICANN is a travelling circus
>
> It=92s staff are happy to jerk us.
>
> They talk free expression
>
> While full of represssion
>
> And no process to create but to work us.
>
> ....
>
> A girl from the north came to San Juan,
>
> with no idea of what went on.
>
> She kicked out the bums,
>
> after drinking much rum.
>
> Now no one can say NARALOs a con.
>
>
>
> A young ICANN rep for Iraq
>
> Was fed up things were getting off-track.
>
> =93Won=92t you please go away,=94
>
> the Committee would say,
>
> =93We just hope something=92s there when you get back.=94
>
>
>
> I once went to ICANN San Juan.
>
> To find out what was going on.
>
> I attended a session,
>
> and have a confession,
>
> ICANN tell dot-pro from dot-con.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 2, 2007, at 9:08 AM, Annette Muehlberg wrote:
>
>> Hi Evan,
>>
>> it was great getting to know you in San Juan.
>> Robin Gross asked about the limericks you guys made.
>>
>> why not send them out on the at-large list?
>>
>> would be great to put that on our website too. running our -=20
>> independent-
>> ALAC website is a real issue - which we did not solve after Jean  had =
to
>> leave (and there are some stories to tell why that is the case...).  a=
re
>> you in touch with her?
>>
>> best
>> annette
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NA-Discuss mailing list
>> NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-=20
>> lists.icann.org
>> ---
>> Draft MoU with ICANN:
>> http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
>>
>> Draft Operating Principles:
>> http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP
>>
>> Draft Code of Conduct:
>> http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct
>
>
>