I agree.
All ALSs go through a process of “approval”. What process do individuals have to go through to ensure that they are lobbyists or others that would be unattractive to our group. Unless we create some kind of umbrella group for the individuals that would act as a pseudo-ALS and they could police their own membership (this has been suggested before but I’m not sure by whom). We need some kind of wording clarifying what we would like this to look like.
D
Darlene A. Thompson
Community Access Program Administrator
Nunavut Department of Education/N-CAP
c/o P.O. Box 1000, Station 910
Iqaluit, NU X0A 0H0
Phone: (867) 975-6531
Fax: (867) 979-8870
dthompson@gov.nu.ca
From:
na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org]
On Behalf Of RJGlass |
America@Large
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2007 11:04
PM
To: nick.ashton-hart@icann.org
Cc: NA Discuss
Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Staff
Review of Draft MoU Terms
Thanks. There is only one area which concerns me that has been
under some discussion for some time:
---------
3.1 The NARALO shall be comprised of At-Large Structures and unaffiliated individuals within the North American Region. All interested citizens or residents are welcomed to join as unaffiliated individuals, to join an ALS, to encourage their organization to apply for ALS certification or to form a new organization and apply for ALS certification.
3.2 To help ensure participation by any interested individual in the North American Region, the NARALO will encourage the formation and certification of additional At-Large Structures and their participation in the NARALO.
---------
My concern is how we allocate 'unaffiliated individuals'
ie:
do we qualify people as individual users?
what participation/involvement do they have?
do we draw a new set of documentation for unaffiilated users?
what issues are we not considering that may be a consideration later?
et cetera ??
-Randy Glass
A@L
On 5/23/07, Nick Ashton-Hart <nick.ashton-hart@icann.org> wrote:
Dear North American
community:
As promised, I've attached the review of the terms of the MoU from
ICANN's perspective. I hope it is useful in your deliberations and if
there are any questions please don't hesitate to ask.
--
Regards,
Nick Ashton-Hart
PO Box 32160
London N4 2XY
United Kingdom
UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011
USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460
Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135
mobile: +44 (7774) 932798
Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com /
AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com /
Skype: nashtonhart
Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart
_______________________________________________
NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
---
Draft MoU with ICANN:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
Draft Operating Principles:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP
Draft Code of Conduct:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct
--
-------------------------
AmericaAtLarge.org
RJPacific.com
DDMF.org