Robert
Not at all.
And I told you that in my reply to your private email to me.
Mis-representing what I said is not kosher at all.
I sent some info that was sent to me by Frank after a discussion
with several people about how to improve the respect in online communication.
He is the ICANN expert in this. This is a follow up to the emails I have
sent previously on list communication.
With regard to who has contacted the Ombudsman to date about
emails sent to the public list (NOT the NARALO list) - I cannot say, as
Ombudsman referrals are confidential and he hasn’t told me anything about
that. Others have however indicated to me that they have considered approaching
or have approached him about some emails on the public list. I haven’t
been informed by anyone about complaints to him on any communication on the
NARALO list to date.
That is the correct information, and I hope that you will
correct any emails that you have sent out with the erroneous information .
Jacquelin
From: Robert Guerra
[mailto:lists@privaterra.info]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 17:03
To: NA Discuss
Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] [At-Large] FW: Information onrespectful
communication
As some of you might have seen. it seem that Jacqueline
thinks that comments from myself and others on NA RALO are soo inappropiate
that it requires a referral to the ombudsman for his comment.
Frankly, i'm amazed and shocked. I ask that if you feel
strongly on this that you comment - ASAP.
thanks
Robert
--
Begin forwarded message:
From: Robert Guerra <lists@privaterra.info>
Date: October 29, 2007 4:59:08 PM PDT
To: At-Large
Global List <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [At-Large] FW: Information
onrespectful communication
Jacqueline:
Huh !
Either don't understand your email, or am so surprised that
as outgoing chair you would take such an action. To be hones, after a
productive and team building day yesterday - you take this bombshell
and drop this on us. i'm frankly shocked ...
I am assuming correctly that differences of opinion are such
that you - in your own personal capacity - are asking the ombudsman
to pass a judgement on individuals in at-large that are exercising their
freedom of speech?
An action such as a referral should be done in consultation
with the ALAC, and not done on your whim. Please seek the support of your
peers, to take such drastic steps.
Might I suggest that - instead - you seek the input of the
alac, and see if indeed we concur with your course of action. If obtain support,
fine. If not, then no course of action - should be obtain.
In summary - I think I speak for many of those on the
ALAC in saying, please seeking clarify your proposed actions. Personally, I
think they are most inappropriate.
regards,
Robert
---
Robert Guerra <rguerra@privaterra.ca>
Managing Director, Privaterra
Tel +1 416 893 0377
On 29-Oct-07, at 4:01 PM, Jacqueline A. Morris wrote:
0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear all
As so many of the postings to this list are so disrespectful I have asked the Ombudsman for his input informally, before he gets brought into it formally by people who this has affected negatively. He has offered the following. Please read and attempt to follow some of the suggestions in the documents he has sent, so we can all work productively.
Jacqueline
From: frank.fowlie [mailto:frank.fowlie@icann.org]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 15:51
To: jacqueline Morris
Subject:
wellington comment from page 6 on
and
Frank Fowlie, MACAM
Ombudsman
The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
Marina del Rey
California, USA, 90292
tel: +310-823-9358
fax: +310-823-8649
www.icannombudsman.orgThe Values of this Office are:
-Respect for Diversity;
-Excellence in Ombudsmanship;
-Professionalism;
-Confidentiality;
-Impartiality;
-and Independence.
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 10/27/2007
11:02