Important issues have been raise, and I agree a full and open discussion needs to take place.
I think there will be times when we feel ICANN has not heard our voice, and is not acting in the interest of our constituents. Reserving certain mechanisms to address those circumstances will be important for the RALO, and is in the spirit of our purpose.
I consider this a matter of the balance of interests. Other interests will exercise their voice and power, and they will not always be in the public interest. I think of the equivalent "branches of government" principle... we are not a rubber stamp here to support everything that ICANN may decide. We are here to make sure that the voices "At Large" have a vehicle to be heard.
Best regards, and glad to see the discussion.
-Michael Maranda
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Executive Director, CTCNet Chicago Chapter
Co-Founder, Chicago Digital Access Alliance
Co-Chair, Illinois Community Technology Coalition
President, Association For Community Networking
Support the efforts of the Chicago Digital Access Alliance: http://www.digitalaccessalliance.org