Hi Randy
Nick is working on the San Juan registrant session. Ive copied
ths reply to him so he can liaise with you about where they are with it and
what you can do to assist.
With regard to the working group, we can discuss at the next
ALAC meeting and agree to set this one up, if you’re willing to work on what
the objectives are, timeframe, workplan…
Jacqueline
From: RJGlass |
America@Large [mailto:jipshida@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2007 12:05 AM
To: jam@jacquelinemorris.com
Cc: Danny Younger; ga@gnso.icann.org; NA Discuss
Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Request for Issues Report
Yes, let's discuss this in San
Juan. I'll volunteer to participate, how can I help?
Randy Glass
A@L
On 5/20/07, Jacqueline A. Morris
< jam@jacquelinemorris.com>
wrote:
Hi Randy, Danny
Do you want to set up some
terms of reference for this working group to function? We can put out a call
for members from the other regions as well and create an at-large working group
to work on these registrant issues… we are also working on the workshops for
San Juan– some suggestions have already come in for a session on
registrar/registrant issues at San Juan. It would be cool if you could
participate in that planning as well.
Thanks
Jacqueline
From: RJGlass | America@Large [mailto:jipshida@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2007 5:40 PM
To: Danny Younger
Cc: ga@gnso.icann.org;
NA Discuss
Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Request for Issues Report
I agree. I think we need a working group
to deal with registrant issues and reccommend policy changes.
Randy Glass
A@L
On 5/18/07, Danny Younger <dannyyounger@yahoo.com> wrote:
Having watched the RegisterFly debacle unfold on a
day-by-day basis for quite some time I have come to
realize that we have a need to develop new policies to
better protect the registrant community.
In particular, I have read many allegations along
these lines: "A number of domains were 'hijacked' by
RF changing domain contact details".
This type of transfer is not covered by the Consensus
Policy on Transfer of Registrations Between Registrars
because it does not happen "between" registrars but
rather through a single registrar.
What we need is a policy to govern transfers between
registrants at a single registrar so that the
interests of all parties to the transfer may be
protected.
We don't want to have registrants at the mercy of the
capricious whims of a rogue actor. If a change of
registrant is enacted in such a manner, a process must
be in place to dispute improper changes to the
registration record.
I call upon this community to request an issues report
on this subject so that the GNSO may develop
appropriate policy.
regards,
Danny Younger
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a PS3 game guru.
Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.
http://videogames.yahoo.com/platform?platform=120121
_______________________________________________
NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
---
Draft MoU with ICANN:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
Draft Operating Principles:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP
Draft Code of Conduct:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct
--
-------------------------
AmericaAtLarge.org
RJPacific.com
DDMF.org
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.5/812 - Release Date: 5/19/2007 1:52
PM
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.5/812 - Release Date: 5/19/2007 1:52
PM
--
-------------------------
AmericaAtLarge.org
RJPacific.com
DDMF.org
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.0/818 - Release Date: 5/25/2007 12:32
PM