I am stating a view, not engaging in debate.  I dont see a reason to state the matter as you have.  The percentage of Latino's in Chicago (for example) dwarfs any other non-English linguistic-ethnic group.  Would we send them to  LAC-RALO?  I also dont think there needs to be further barrier to their participation.

On 6/5/07, Evan Leibovitch <evan@telly.org> wrote:
Michael Maranda wrote:

> This would also be appealing for inclusion of a significant proportion
> of US population.
If we used that criteria we should then also include Mandarin, Greek,
Hindi, Italian, and probably a few others.

How often must this subject be re-debated?

- Evan


_______________________________________________
NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
---
Draft MoU with ICANN:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU

Draft Operating Principles:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP

Draft Code of Conduct:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct



--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Executive Director, CTCNet Chicago Chapter
Co-Founder, Chicago Digital Access Alliance
Co-Chair, Illinois Community Technology Coalition
President, Association For Community Networking

Support the efforts of the Chicago Digital Access Alliance:   http://www.digitalaccessalliance.org