I am stating a view, not engaging in debate. I dont see a reason to state the matter as you have. The percentage of Latino's in Chicago (for example) dwarfs any other non-English linguistic-ethnic group. Would we send them to LAC-RALO? I also dont think there needs to be further barrier to their participation.
Michael Maranda wrote:
> This would also be appealing for inclusion of a significant proportion
> of US population.
If we used that criteria we should then also include Mandarin, Greek,
Hindi, Italian, and probably a few others.
How often must this subject be re-debated?
- Evan
_______________________________________________
NA-Discuss mailing list
NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
---
Draft MoU with ICANN:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
Draft Operating Principles:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP
Draft Code of Conduct:
http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct