Alan Greenberg posted the following comment on 27 June: "The ALAC requests that ICANN consider charging registrars part or all of the $0.22 fee for names deleted during the AGP." http://forum.icann.org/lists/budget-0708/msg00001.html Sorry to say, that I cannot find the minutes of the meeting in which this decision was agreed upon, nor can I find a recording of the San Juan meeting sessions. How did the ALAC arrive at this particular recommendation without the benefit of any on-list discussion whatsoever? What input did the RALOs have into the endorsement of this one specific recommendation? Why were other viable options not endorsed? Is this an authorized statement? If so, why wasn't it issued by the chair? Some answers would be appreciated. ____________________________________________________________________________________ We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265