Hi Nick

I thought that Jocob took comments from the Caribbean to collate – I know there was a discussion on it. I can collate if that didn’t happen…

Jacqueline

 

From: Nick Ashton-Hart [mailto:nick.ashton-hart@icann.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 4:19 AM
To: jam@jacquelinemorris.com
Cc: 'Evan Leibovitch'; ediaz@dconsultinggroup.com; 'NA Discuss'
Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Language

 

The region consultation is still going on - every month I'm asked by someone within ICANN to get -SOME- response on that consultation from the At-Large community. 

 

At the moment, PR is in North America because of the regional configuration of the ICANN Geographic Regions. If PR wants to move to LAC, again, now would be the time to put that suggestion forward....

 

--
Regards,
 

Nick Ashton-Hart
Director, At-Large

ICANN

PO Box 32160
London N4 2XY
United Kingdom
Main Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011]

USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460

Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135
mobile: +44 (7774) 932798
email:
nick.ashton-hart@icann.org
Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart

 

  



 

On 6 Jun 2007, at 01:18, Jacqueline A. Morris wrote:



Actually, they did ask if they could be LACRALO members - LACRALO determined

it had no issue accepting them if they wanted to be - but that was last year

before there was movement on forming the NARALO.

But with regard to languages - if the agreement was for the official

languages of the members of the regions, then, as PR is a member of the

region, Spanish should be included. No matter how many or how few people

speak it.

ICANN did have a consultation going on the regional classification a while

ago -I can check back to see what came of it - I don't recall seeing a

report or anything yet.

Jacqueline

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Evan Leibovitch [mailto:evan@telly.org] 

Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 5:50 PM

To: jam@jacquelinemorris.com

Cc: 'Robert Guerra'; ediaz@dconsultinggroup.com; 'NA Discuss'

Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Language

 

Jacqueline A. Morris wrote:

 

Well - from what I remember - feel free to correct - Puerto Rico is

officially bilingual, isn't it? And it is part of NARALO. I leave it up to

the Puerto Rican NARALO member to decide whether to take this forward or

not. I believe that after the meeting in SJ, there will be more ALS

applicants from PR, so maybe then they can call for Spanish if they want to.

 

 

Well, then you open the issue of why there should be a RALO with only

three participating jurisdictions.

 

Funny, elswehere in the world the RALO boundaries are drawn on

continental boundaries. Newcomers can only wonder about the politics

behind the decision to keep the Caribbean and Mexico out of North

America on ICANN's globe.

 

Of course, one other option is to ask the Puerto Rican ALSs if they'd

prefer to be part of the LAC-RALO

 

- Evan

 

No virus found in this incoming message.

Checked by AVG Free Edition. 

Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.9/832 - Release Date: 6/4/2007 6:43

PM

 

 

No virus found in this outgoing message.

Checked by AVG Free Edition. 

Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.9/832 - Release Date: 6/4/2007 6:43

PM

 

 

 

_______________________________________________

NA-Discuss mailing list

NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org

http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org

---

Draft MoU with ICANN:

http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU

 

Draft Operating Principles:

http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP

 

Draft Code of Conduct:

http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct

 

 

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.9/834 - Release Date: 6/5/2007 2:38 PM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.9/834 - Release Date: 6/5/2007 2:38 PM