At 2022-09-13 04:08 PM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 3:22 PM
Alan Greenberg
<alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca
> wrote:
- Can you enlarge on that. The new rules remove the requirement to
- participate in meetings or other events and to vote. The major new
- requirement is to allow At-Large to send occasional messages to ALS
members.
In my original mail sent 10 hours ago. nothing in the above were in my
list of objections.
- There is also a requirement that the representative update us on the
ALS status every 2 years. Is that onerous?
5.7 - Giving new, undefined and fully discretionary powers to the chair
that did not exist before and are not necessary
6.1.1 Extending the terms of of leadership unnecessarily
6.2 Extending term limits, also completely unnecessarily
7.2.1 Demands made on ALSs for needless service with no corresponding new
benefit
Pretty well the entirety of Appendix A and Appendix B
It would be helpful if you could be more specific. The group that
developed the new ALS responsibilities were VERY conscious about not
making unreasonable or useless demands. Note that the first 4
bullets in Appendix A are the things that will disappear.
What is left:
1. Allow us to send occasional messages to the ALS members (which you
said you do not object to)
2. Report in every 2 years
3. Mention ICANN/At-large on your website (or other Internet presence) -
which was always a requirement
4. Representative should respond if contacted, and involve their ALS
members *IF* such a contribution seems appropriate (ALS decision)
5. Provide a link or email address to allow prospective ALS members to
contact the ALS.
What needless onerous service were you referring to?
Alan
THAT's what's onerous, and
outrageously so. It seems like the authors have totally lost touch with
the concept of who is in service to who.
- Evan