Hello all, I want to thank everyone for an extremely productive meeting on Monday, planned as a single-issue gathering to discover and refine ideas related to the selection of an At-Large representative on the ICANN Board. What was intended as just a place to "brainstorm", in fact resulted in some specific proposals and options, with an unexpectedly high level of consensus for the core process. I have been told that our work has since been discussed and favourably received at the APRALO and ALAC meetings held today. The results of our meeting have been posted in two forms: 1) I have attempted to simplify and explain the proposed NARALO process using a table: https://st.icann.org/working-groups/index.cgi?draft_procedure_for_appointmen... 2) The raw notes/minutes from the meeting are at https://st.icann.org/naralo/index.cgi?21_09_2009_summary_minutes Please let me know if we have misrepresented either the consensus conclusions or your personal comments. Thanks! - Evan