Proposals in NARALO Related to the Registrant
Dear Community members: There has been considerable activity in recent weeks on various community lists (as well as in online news forums) relating to domain registration, accreditation of registrars, proposed initiatives intended to create better safety nets for registrants and related issues. At the same time, the ICANN community as a whole is engaged in a consultative process related to the key agreement (the Registrar Accreditiation Agreement (³RAA²) that governs many aspects of domain registration and the rights and responsibilities of registrants and registrars, as well as ICANN since it is one of the two contracting parties to the agreement. As you all know, many of these these issues are complex. At the same time, several proposals and issues raised, especially in the NARALO of late, seem to me to have elements which are interrelated (especially as regards the fundamental objective they seek to produce). What I would like to propose is that a couple of briefings be arranged to help further the understanding of these and related issues in the community. I would propose two sessions, of an hour to 90 minutes each, as per usual with simultaneous interpretation: 1. The Registrant/Registrar Relationship * What safeguards are available to registrants? * How are they implemented? * What compliance activities could, or already do, help ensure their implementation? * What proposals are being discussed to increase the protection available to registrants? 2. The RAA and the Internet User * Does the RAA impact the non-registrant user of the internet? * If so, how does it impact them, and are there different impacts for different types of users? * What if any changes being discussed would (or could) affect the non-registrant end-user, and how? It seems to me that these two sessions would likely help everyone have a much increased understanding of the issues and lead to a very productive debate. I would suggest that the sessions specifically involve various constituencies in presenting to help everyone understand the perspectives of the key parties. -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart Director for At-Large Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Main Tel: +33 (450) 40 46 88 USA DD: +1 (310) 578-8637 Fax: +41 (22) 594-85-44 Mobile: +41 (79) 595 54-68 email: nick.ashton-hart@icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart
Nick, After 18 months worth of consultations, it should be fairly clear by now what the outstanding issues and proposed solutions are. What is not clear is how Staff and/or the Registrars intend to respond to the comments tendered by: 1. The U.S. Department of Commerce 2. The ICANN Business Constituency 3. The ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency 4. The INTA Internet Committee 5. The Internet Commerce Association 6. The ALAC 7. Individual contributors It would be more appropriate for us to be briefed after we have an ICANN or Registrar response to the all comments tendered thus far. Please feel free to inform us when the formal Staff Summary/analysis of comments on the RAA is made public.
For what it is worth, it would seem to me that providing an opportunity for community members to learn more about these issues would not be a disadvantage. Of course, if everyone feels they are sufficiently well-informed then it the briefings would be unnecessary. With respect to the information below being of use to the briefings, it normally requires about 2-3 weeks advance notice to arrange a briefing, to allow those presenting time to prepare and also to give the community enough advance warning to incorporate the briefings into their schedules. It would seem to be likely that the consultation summary etc would therefore already be posted before the briefings would take place. FYI, Danny happened to join the ALAC Excomm teleconference today so to repeat what I said to him on this sub On 08/09/2008 14:08, "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@yahoo.com> wrote:
Nick,
After 18 months worth of consultations, it should be fairly clear by now what the outstanding issues and proposed solutions are. What is not clear is how Staff and/or the Registrars intend to respond to the comments tendered by:
1. The U.S. Department of Commerce 2. The ICANN Business Constituency 3. The ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency 4. The INTA Internet Committee 5. The Internet Commerce Association 6. The ALAC 7. Individual contributors
It would be more appropriate for us to be briefed after we have an ICANN or Registrar response to the all comments tendered thus far. Please feel free to inform us when the formal Staff Summary/analysis of comments on the RAA is made public.
-- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart Director for At-Large Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Main Tel: +33 (450) 40 46 88 USA DD: +1 (310) 578-8637 Fax: +41 (22) 594-85-44 Mobile: +41 (79) 595 54-68 email: nick.ashton-hart@icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart
I know that such sessions would certainly benefit me, personally! I hope that you are able to do them. D Darlene A. Thompson Community Access Program Administrator Nunavut Dept. of Education / N-CAP P.O. Box 1000, Station 910 Iqaluit, NU X0A 0H0 Phone: (867) 975-5631 Fax: (867) 975-5610 E-mail: dthompson@gov.nu.ca -----Original Message----- From: na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Nick Ashton-Hart Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 6:37 AM To: NA Discuss Cc: At-Large Worldwide Subject: [NA-Discuss] Proposals in NARALO Related to the Registrant Dear Community members: There has been considerable activity in recent weeks on various community lists (as well as in online news forums) relating to domain registration, accreditation of registrars, proposed initiatives intended to create better safety nets for registrants and related issues. At the same time, the ICANN community as a whole is engaged in a consultative process related to the key agreement (the Registrar Accreditiation Agreement (³RAA²) that governs many aspects of domain registration and the rights and responsibilities of registrants and registrars, as well as ICANN since it is one of the two contracting parties to the agreement. As you all know, many of these these issues are complex. At the same time, several proposals and issues raised, especially in the NARALO of late, seem to me to have elements which are interrelated (especially as regards the fundamental objective they seek to produce). What I would like to propose is that a couple of briefings be arranged to help further the understanding of these and related issues in the community. I would propose two sessions, of an hour to 90 minutes each, as per usual with simultaneous interpretation: 1. The Registrant/Registrar Relationship * What safeguards are available to registrants? * How are they implemented? * What compliance activities could, or already do, help ensure their implementation? * What proposals are being discussed to increase the protection available to registrants? 2. The RAA and the Internet User * Does the RAA impact the non-registrant user of the internet? * If so, how does it impact them, and are there different impacts for different types of users? * What if any changes being discussed would (or could) affect the non-registrant end-user, and how? It seems to me that these two sessions would likely help everyone have a much increased understanding of the issues and lead to a very productive debate. I would suggest that the sessions specifically involve various constituencies in presenting to help everyone understand the perspectives of the key parties. -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart Director for At-Large Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Main Tel: +33 (450) 40 46 88 USA DD: +1 (310) 578-8637 Fax: +41 (22) 594-85-44 Mobile: +41 (79) 595 54-68 email: nick.ashton-hart@icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart
We'll be very interested in participating. Eduardo Diaz ISOC-PR -----Original Message----- From: na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Nick Ashton-Hart Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 6:37 AM To: NA Discuss Cc: At-Large Worldwide Subject: [NA-Discuss] Proposals in NARALO Related to the Registrant Dear Community members: There has been considerable activity in recent weeks on various community lists (as well as in online news forums) relating to domain registration, accreditation of registrars, proposed initiatives intended to create better safety nets for registrants and related issues. At the same time, the ICANN community as a whole is engaged in a consultative process related to the key agreement (the Registrar Accreditiation Agreement (³RAA²) that governs many aspects of domain registration and the rights and responsibilities of registrants and registrars, as well as ICANN since it is one of the two contracting parties to the agreement. As you all know, many of these these issues are complex. At the same time, several proposals and issues raised, especially in the NARALO of late, seem to me to have elements which are interrelated (especially as regards the fundamental objective they seek to produce). What I would like to propose is that a couple of briefings be arranged to help further the understanding of these and related issues in the community. I would propose two sessions, of an hour to 90 minutes each, as per usual with simultaneous interpretation: 1. The Registrant/Registrar Relationship * What safeguards are available to registrants? * How are they implemented? * What compliance activities could, or already do, help ensure their implementation? * What proposals are being discussed to increase the protection available to registrants? 2. The RAA and the Internet User * Does the RAA impact the non-registrant user of the internet? * If so, how does it impact them, and are there different impacts for different types of users? * What if any changes being discussed would (or could) affect the non-registrant end-user, and how? It seems to me that these two sessions would likely help everyone have a much increased understanding of the issues and lead to a very productive debate. I would suggest that the sessions specifically involve various constituencies in presenting to help everyone understand the perspectives of the key parties. -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart Director for At-Large Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Main Tel: +33 (450) 40 46 88 USA DD: +1 (310) 578-8637 Fax: +41 (22) 594-85-44 Mobile: +41 (79) 595 54-68 email: nick.ashton-hart@icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.19/1659 - Release Date: 9/8/2008 7:01 AM
participants (4)
-
Danny Younger -
Eduardo Diaz -
Nick Ashton-Hart -
Thompson, Darlene