Re: [NA-Discuss] Unaffiliated member voting (was Re: NARALO VotingResult ...)
Danny Younger wrote:
I tend to think that most of you that hail from organizational entities rarely (if ever) discuss ICANN matters at the local level. I owe you no justification of what I do at the local level, as in this regard I am accountable to my ALS and not you. Of course you are welcome to engage in ongoing speculation on how little I (or others on this list) do; such speculation will certainly be as unproductive as the rest of this sub-thread has been.
Personally, I'd like to spend my efforts here on policy not process. Of course this won't fly with you right now as I'm one of the nasty oppressors who plot in the shadows to silence you ..... as anyone reading this mailing list over the past two years can clearly see. And as you continue to remind us in this email thread. If have a problem with the ALS model used by At-Large, you had your chance to address that during the ALAC Review.That's now done. Unless other NARALO support exists for (what I consider to be) distraction away from policy work, I won't be engaging it any more. I have no (further) interest in using my ICANN time to debate the fine points of representational democracy. Danny, you were supposed to review a document I sent you Friday related to new gTLDs and intellectual property. I still haven't received your review of what I sent. Instead, you spend your energies on this. How unfortunate. - Evan
Evan, feel free to forward your document on new gTLDs and intellectual property to all those members of your CLUE organization that actively debate ICANN matters. Perhaps then we'll see if there actually is a bottom-up process or if it's no more than a ruse. --- On Tue, 9/15/09, Evan Leibovitch <evan@telly.org> wrote:
From: Evan Leibovitch <evan@telly.org> Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Unaffiliated member voting (was Re: NARALO VotingResult ...) To: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@yahoo.com>, "NA Discuss" <na-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Date: Tuesday, September 15, 2009, 3:37 PM Danny Younger wrote:
I tend to think that most of you that hail from organizational entities rarely (if ever) discuss ICANN matters at the local level. I owe you no justification of what I do at the local level, as in this regard I am accountable to my ALS and not you. Of course you are welcome to engage in ongoing speculation on how little I (or others on this list) do; such speculation will certainly be as unproductive as the rest of this sub-thread has been.
Personally, I'd like to spend my efforts here on policy not process. Of course this won't fly with you right now as I'm one of the nasty oppressors who plot in the shadows to silence you ..... as anyone reading this mailing list over the past two years can clearly see. And as you continue to remind us in this email thread.
If have a problem with the ALS model used by At-Large, you had your chance to address that during the ALAC Review.That's now done. Unless other NARALO support exists for (what I consider to be) distraction away from policy work, I won't be engaging it any more. I have no (further) interest in using my ICANN time to debate the fine points of representational democracy.
Danny, you were supposed to review a document I sent you Friday related to new gTLDs and intellectual property. I still haven't received your review of what I sent. Instead, you spend your energies on this. How unfortunate.
- Evan
participants (2)
-
Danny Younger -
Evan Leibovitch