Fwd: [Internet Policy] Mozilla public consultation on DNS over HTTPS
If anyone cares to comment... -ed ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Ayden Férdeline via InternetPolicy <internetpolicy@elists.isoc.org> Date: Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 12:24 PM Subject: [Internet Policy] Mozilla public consultation on DNS over HTTPS To: ISOC INTERNETPOLICY <internetpolicy@elists.isoc.org> Dear all, I am sharing this public consultation for information purposes only. The Mozilla Corporation has launched a public consultation to crowd source ideas, recommendations, and insights that can help Mozilla to maximize the security and privacy-enhancing benefits of DNS over HTTPS before it is rolled out in Firefox outside of the United States. (Firefox users in the United States already benefit from it.) If of interest, you can find more information on how to submit a comment here: https://blog.mozilla.org/netpolicy/2020/11/18/doh-comment-period-2020/ Comments are accepted until 4 January 2021. Best wishes, Ayden Férdeline _______________________________________________ To manage your Internet Society subscriptions or unsubscribe, log into the Member Portal at https://admin.internetsociety.org/622619/User/Login and go to the Preferences tab within your profile. - View the Internet Society Code of Conduct: https://www.internetsociety.org/become-a-member/code-of-conduct/ -- *NOTICE:* This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately.
I appreciate your raising awareness of this comment period. One concern that exists for DoH / DoT (or even DoQ) usage, is with respect to providers - that one trusts the provider on what they might be intervening with. Typically, this is about what they are blocking and why. I suspect the focus is rather significant things being BLOCKED, but how much attention is there on the things that they might ADD? What is to prevent a DoH provider from injecting their own TLDs or alternative roots at the top level outside of the MSM processes and/or circumnavigating the i* vetting processes like were used for .onion or other special use TLDs? As many of the DoH providers are private and/or proprietary, something akin to the commitment Mozilla adheres to for the Public Suffix List, where things that are not compliant with the ICP-3 Document [ https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/unique-authoritative-root-2012-02-25-e...] or have been vetted through IETF/IAB et al I* are excluded. This helps with continuity with respect to the root and TLDs that the resolution process will (or won't) support. If DoH providers pledge to only resolve the items in the ICP-3 root or those strings carefully vetted via I* processes, and furthermore pledges to mute or block any traffic from strings that are non-compliant being sent out to the root nameservers, this would aid in a better measurement of Name Collision data, and perform the valuable function of controlled interruption in advance of the coveted next round, while playing a valuable service in improving what outcomes we might see from things like Name Collision noise measurement at the root. -Jothan Jothan Frakes On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 12:06 PM Eduardo Diaz <eduardodiazrivera@gmail.com> wrote:
If anyone cares to comment...
-ed
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Ayden Férdeline via InternetPolicy <internetpolicy@elists.isoc.org> Date: Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 12:24 PM Subject: [Internet Policy] Mozilla public consultation on DNS over HTTPS To: ISOC INTERNETPOLICY <internetpolicy@elists.isoc.org>
Dear all,
I am sharing this public consultation for information purposes only.
The Mozilla Corporation has launched a public consultation to crowd source ideas, recommendations, and insights that can help Mozilla to maximize the security and privacy-enhancing benefits of DNS over HTTPS before it is rolled out in Firefox outside of the United States. (Firefox users in the United States already benefit from it.)
If of interest, you can find more information on how to submit a comment here: https://blog.mozilla.org/netpolicy/2020/11/18/doh-comment-period-2020/
Comments are accepted until 4 January 2021.
Best wishes, Ayden Férdeline
_______________________________________________ To manage your Internet Society subscriptions or unsubscribe, log into the Member Portal at https://admin.internetsociety.org/622619/User/Login and go to the Preferences tab within your profile. - View the Internet Society Code of Conduct: https://www.internetsociety.org/become-a-member/code-of-conduct/
-- *NOTICE:* This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. ------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------ _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (2)
-
Eduardo Diaz -
Jothan Frakes