The version of the MoU was as of the date of the document - 16th May; see the top right-corner. I have attached the text as at that time. On 24/05/07, Wendy Seltzer <wendy@seltzer.com> wrote:

What version of the draft was reviewed, and why were some but not all of the reviewed provisions quoted in the text? Without either of those pieces of information, it is difficult to respond to the comments.

Thanks, --Wendy

Nick Ashton-Hart wrote:

...

Dear North American community:

As promised, I've attached the review of the terms of the MoU from ICANN's perspective. I hope it is useful in your deliberations and if there are any questions please don't hesitate to ask.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ica... --- Draft MoU with ICANN: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU

Draft Operating Principles: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP

Draft Code of Conduct: http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct

-- Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@seltzer.org phone: +1.617.418.3456 / +44 (0)1865 287203 // cell: 07785 550361 Visiting Fellow, Oxford Internet Institute Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html http://www.chillingeffects.org/

-- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart