Re: [NA-Discuss] I'm voting against changes to the NARALO Rules
Can you enlarge on that. The new rules remove the requirement to participate in meetings or other events and to vote. The major new requirement is to allow At-Large to send occasional messages to ALS members. There is also a requirement that the representative update us on the ALS status every 2 years. Is that onerous? Alan At 2022-09-13 04:41 AM, Evan Leibovitch via NA-Discuss wrote:
And don't even get me started about the insanity of the proposed participation standards. I have maintained for decades that we should be generous about who we admit and stingy about who we kick out. These new "standards" just serve to further limit the reach of ICANN At-Large to the groups and people who are able to invest substantial time to learn its culture.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 3:22 PM Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
Can you enlarge on that. The new rules remove the requirement to participate in meetings or other events and to vote. The major new requirement is to allow At-Large to send occasional messages to ALS members.
In my original mail sent 10 hours ago. nothing in the above were in my list of objections.
There is also a requirement that the representative update us on the ALS status every 2 years. Is that onerous?
5.7 - Giving new, undefined and fully discretionary powers to the chair that did not exist before and are not necessary 6.1.1 Extending the terms of of leadership unnecessarily 6.2 Extending term limits, also completely unnecessarily 7.2.1 Demands made on ALSs for needless service with no corresponding new benefit Pretty well the entirety of Appendix A and Appendix B THAT's what's onerous, and outrageously so. It seems like the authors have totally lost touch with the concept of who is in service to who. - Evan
participants (2)
-
Alan Greenberg -
Evan Leibovitch