Opinions Requested
Hi Folks Recently I notified the NARALO membership to expect a vote to agree or disagree on including Sebastien Bachollet as a candidate in the slate for the Board seat. Currently only two names are on the slate This week EURALO completed a purpose vote from their ALS's that agreed that he should be included. The rules require that two additional RALO's must agree *PASSIONATELY *to expand the slate to include Sebastien In order to measure our passion on this subject it seems we need to ask the community *first on your views on this subject*. If we feel passionate to include him then I will direct Ariel to promptly send out the vote. Please note we have very little time to discuss this situation given the timelines set by the committee. Changes in these processes should be high on the agenda for the next election cycle to reduce this type of confusion Take a minute and express your opinion on this subject . If the majority of the opinions supports a vote so be it. If the majority is against a vote we will tell the committee that our RALO will not hold a vote, A 'no vote' resulting in no support for adding Sebastien to the slate. Opinions welcome Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
It might be helpful if you could cut and past the relevant rule so we can better understand the procedural issue. Seth From: na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Glenn McKnight Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 7:38 AM To: NA Discuss Subject: [NA-Discuss] Opinions Requested Hi Folks Recently I notified the NARALO membership to expect a vote to agree or disagree on including Sebastien Bachollet as a candidate in the slate for the Board seat. Currently only two names are on the slate This week EURALO completed a purpose vote from their ALS's that agreed that he should be included. The rules require that two additional RALO's must agree PASSIONATELY to expand the slate to include Sebastien In order to measure our passion on this subject it seems we need to ask the community first on your views on this subject. If we feel passionate to include him then I will direct Ariel to promptly send out the vote. Please note we have very little time to discuss this situation given the timelines set by the committee. Changes in these processes should be high on the agenda for the next election cycle to reduce this type of confusion Take a minute and express your opinion on this subject . If the majority of the opinions supports a vote so be it. If the majority is against a vote we will tell the committee that our RALO will not hold a vote, A 'no vote' resulting in no support for adding Sebastien to the slate. Opinions welcome Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight . --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
In my humble opinion I like John More find the processing a bit daunting but that is another reason why we need more clarity. I think the vetting was done already for the candidates by the committee I have to have confidence they did their job, this this last minute appeal doesn't convince me on the merits of supporting a vote I don't agree to have a vote Glenn McKnight Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight . On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Folks
Recently I notified the NARALO membership to expect a vote to agree or disagree on including Sebastien Bachollet as a candidate in the slate for the Board seat. Currently only two names are on the slate This week EURALO completed a purpose vote from their ALS's that agreed that he should be included.
The rules require that two additional RALO's must agree *PASSIONATELY *to expand the slate to include Sebastien
In order to measure our passion on this subject it seems we need to ask the community *first on your views on this subject*. If we feel passionate to include him then I will direct Ariel to promptly send out the vote.
Please note we have very little time to discuss this situation given the timelines set by the committee. Changes in these processes should be high on the agenda for the next election cycle to reduce this type of confusion
Take a minute and express your opinion on this subject . If the majority of the opinions supports a vote so be it. If the majority is against a vote we will tell the committee that our RALO will not hold a vote, A 'no vote' resulting in no support for adding Sebastien to the slate.
Opinions welcome
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
I support adding Sebastien. He has good experience in the role. And if EURALO want him, let's give him a shot. Joly MacFie joly@punkcast.com 218 565 9365 On Jan 24, 2017 1:21 PM, "Glenn McKnight" <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com> wrote:
In my humble opinion I like John More find the processing a bit daunting but that is another reason why we need more clarity.
I think the vetting was done already for the candidates by the committee I have to have confidence they did their job, this this last minute appeal doesn't convince me on the merits of supporting a vote
I don't agree to have a vote
Glenn McKnight
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Folks
Recently I notified the NARALO membership to expect a vote to agree or disagree on including Sebastien Bachollet as a candidate in the slate for the Board seat. Currently only two names are on the slate This week EURALO completed a purpose vote from their ALS's that agreed that he should be included.
The rules require that two additional RALO's must agree *PASSIONATELY *to expand the slate to include Sebastien
In order to measure our passion on this subject it seems we need to ask the community *first on your views on this subject*. If we feel passionate to include him then I will direct Ariel to promptly send out the vote.
Please note we have very little time to discuss this situation given the timelines set by the committee. Changes in these processes should be high on the agenda for the next election cycle to reduce this type of confusion
Take a minute and express your opinion on this subject . If the majority of the opinions supports a vote so be it. If the majority is against a vote we will tell the committee that our RALO will not hold a vote, A 'no vote' resulting in no support for adding Sebastien to the slate.
Opinions welcome
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
Sebastien was, in my opinion, duly considered during the first round of selection of candidates. After review his name was dropped. Using an extra-ordinary process to add him back to the list for consideration should only be done if there is there is a either (1) valid complaint against the first round selection process and/or (2) new information that was not considered in the first round review. Neither is the case, and as such I am not supportive of NARALO supporting rebuking the selection committee’s first round list. regards Robert -- Robert Guerra Twitter: twitter.com/netfreedom Email: rguerra@privaterra.org PGP Keys : https://keybase.io/rguerra On 24 Jan 2017, at 13:26, Joly MacFie wrote:
I support adding Sebastien. He has good experience in the role. And if EURALO want him, let's give him a shot.
Joly MacFie joly@punkcast.com 218 565 9365
On Jan 24, 2017 1:21 PM, "Glenn McKnight" <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com> wrote:
In my humble opinion I like John More find the processing a bit daunting but that is another reason why we need more clarity.
I think the vetting was done already for the candidates by the committee I have to have confidence they did their job, this this last minute appeal doesn't convince me on the merits of supporting a vote
I don't agree to have a vote
Glenn McKnight
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Folks
Recently I notified the NARALO membership to expect a vote to agree or disagree on including Sebastien Bachollet as a candidate in the slate for the Board seat. Currently only two names are on the slate This week EURALO completed a purpose vote from their ALS's that agreed that he should be included.
The rules require that two additional RALO's must agree *PASSIONATELY *to expand the slate to include Sebastien
In order to measure our passion on this subject it seems we need to ask the community *first on your views on this subject*. If we feel passionate to include him then I will direct Ariel to promptly send out the vote.
Please note we have very little time to discuss this situation given the timelines set by the committee. Changes in these processes should be high on the agenda for the next election cycle to reduce this type of confusion
Take a minute and express your opinion on this subject . If the majority of the opinions supports a vote so be it. If the majority is against a vote we will tell the committee that our RALO will not hold a vote, A 'no vote' resulting in no support for adding Sebastien to the slate.
Opinions welcome
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
I agree with Glenn and others. I don't support a vote at this time. Marita On 1/24/2017 1:21 PM, Glenn McKnight wrote:
In my humble opinion I like John More find the processing a bit daunting but that is another reason why we need more clarity.
I think the vetting was done already for the candidates by the committee I have to have confidence they did their job, this this last minute appeal doesn't convince me on the merits of supporting a vote
I don't agree to have a vote
Glenn McKnight
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com <mailto:mcknight.glenn@gmail.com> skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com <mailto:mcknight.glenn@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Folks
Recently I notified the NARALO membership to expect a vote to agree or disagree on including Sebastien Bachollet as a candidate in the slate for the Board seat. Currently only two names are on the slate This week EURALO completed a purpose vote from their ALS's that agreed that he should be included.
The rules require that two additional RALO's must agree *PASSIONATELY *to expand the slate to include Sebastien
In order to measure our passion on this subject it seems we need to ask the community _*first on your views on this subject*_. If we feel passionate to include him then I will direct Ariel to promptly send out the vote.
Please note we have very little time to discuss this situation given the timelines set by the committee. Changes in these processes should be high on the agenda for the next election cycle to reduce this type of confusion
Take a minute and express your opinion on this subject . If the majority of the opinions supports a vote so be it. If the majority is against a vote we will tell the committee that our RALO will not hold a vote, A 'no vote' resulting in no support for adding Sebastien to the slate.
Opinions welcome
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com <mailto:mcknight.glenn@gmail.com> skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
Thanks all for casting your opinion . I want to give this more time to allow more people to voice their opinion We are split at the present moment. Glenn Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight . On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Marita Moll <mmoll@ca.inter.net> wrote:
I agree with Glenn and others. I don't support a vote at this time.
Marita
On 1/24/2017 1:21 PM, Glenn McKnight wrote:
In my humble opinion I like John More find the processing a bit daunting but that is another reason why we need more clarity.
I think the vetting was done already for the candidates by the committee I have to have confidence they did their job, this this last minute appeal doesn't convince me on the merits of supporting a vote
I don't agree to have a vote
Glenn McKnight
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Folks
Recently I notified the NARALO membership to expect a vote to agree or disagree on including Sebastien Bachollet as a candidate in the slate for the Board seat. Currently only two names are on the slate This week EURALO completed a purpose vote from their ALS's that agreed that he should be included.
The rules require that two additional RALO's must agree *PASSIONATELY *to expand the slate to include Sebastien
In order to measure our passion on this subject it seems we need to ask the community *first on your views on this subject*. If we feel passionate to include him then I will direct Ariel to promptly send out the vote.
Please note we have very little time to discuss this situation given the timelines set by the committee. Changes in these processes should be high on the agenda for the next election cycle to reduce this type of confusion
Take a minute and express your opinion on this subject . If the majority of the opinions supports a vote so be it. If the majority is against a vote we will tell the committee that our RALO will not hold a vote, A 'no vote' resulting in no support for adding Sebastien to the slate.
Opinions welcome
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
------ NA-Discuss mailing listNA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
Hi Glenn. I support the position that you, Marita, Robert, and many others have taken - against NARALO supporting an appeal of the BCEC's well-considered selection. - Evan (via mobile) On 24 Jan 2017, 15:05, at 15:05, Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks all for casting your opinion . I want to give this more time to allow more people to voice their opinion We are split at the present moment.
Glenn
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Marita Moll <mmoll@ca.inter.net> wrote:
I agree with Glenn and others. I don't support a vote at this time.
Marita
On 1/24/2017 1:21 PM, Glenn McKnight wrote:
In my humble opinion I like John More find the processing a bit daunting but that is another reason why we need more clarity.
I think the vetting was done already for the candidates by the committee I have to have confidence they did their job, this this last minute appeal doesn't convince me on the merits of supporting a vote
I don't agree to have a vote
Glenn McKnight
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Folks
Recently I notified the NARALO membership to expect a vote to agree or disagree on including Sebastien Bachollet as a candidate in the slate for the Board seat. Currently only two names are on the slate This week EURALO completed a purpose vote from their ALS's that agreed that he should be included.
The rules require that two additional RALO's must agree *PASSIONATELY *to expand the slate to include Sebastien
In order to measure our passion on this subject it seems we need to ask the community *first on your views on this subject*. If we feel passionate to include him then I will direct Ariel to promptly send out the vote.
Please note we have very little time to discuss this situation given the timelines set by the committee. Changes in these processes should be high on the agenda for the next election cycle to reduce this type of confusion
Take a minute and express your opinion on this subject . If the majority of the opinions supports a vote so be it. If the majority is against a vote we will tell the committee that our RALO will not hold a vote, A 'no vote' resulting in no support for adding Sebastien to the slate.
Opinions welcome
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
------ NA-Discuss mailing listNA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
After reading the comments, I would agree with the No Vote position. John More
On Jan 24, 2017, at 8:51 PM, Evan Leibovitch <evanleibovitch@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Glenn.
I support the position that you, Marita, Robert, and many others have taken - against NARALO supporting an appeal of the BCEC's well-considered selection.
- Evan (via mobile) On 24 Jan 2017, at 15:05, Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com <mailto:mcknight.glenn@gmail.com>> wrote: Thanks all for casting your opinion . I want to give this more time to allow more people to voice their opinion We are split at the present moment.
Glenn
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com <mailto:mcknight.glenn@gmail.com> skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Marita Moll <mmoll@ca.inter.net <mailto:mmoll@ca.inter.net>> wrote: I agree with Glenn and others. I don't support a vote at this time.
Marita
On 1/24/2017 1:21 PM, Glenn McKnight wrote:
In my humble opinion I like John More find the processing a bit daunting but that is another reason why we need more clarity.
I think the vetting was done already for the candidates by the committee I have to have confidence they did their job, this this last minute appeal doesn't convince me on the merits of supporting a vote
I don't agree to have a vote
Glenn McKnight
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com <mailto:mcknight.glenn@gmail.com> skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com <mailto:mcknight.glenn@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Folks
Recently I notified the NARALO membership to expect a vote to agree or disagree on including Sebastien Bachollet as a candidate in the slate for the Board seat. Currently only two names are on the slate This week EURALO completed a purpose vote from their ALS's that agreed that he should be included.
The rules require that two additional RALO's must agree PASSIONATELY to expand the slate to include Sebastien
In order to measure our passion on this subject it seems we need to ask the community first on your views on this subject. If we feel passionate to include him then I will direct Ariel to promptly send out the vote.
Please note we have very little time to discuss this situation given the timelines set by the committee. Changes in these processes should be high on the agenda for the next election cycle to reduce this type of confusion
Take a minute and express your opinion on this subject . If the majority of the opinions supports a vote so be it. If the majority is against a vote we will tell the committee that our RALO will not hold a vote, A 'no vote' resulting in no support for adding Sebastien to the slate.
Opinions welcome
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com <mailto:mcknight.glenn@gmail.com> skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss>
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org <http://www.naralo.org/> ------
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss>
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org <http://www.naralo.org/> ------ ------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
Hi all, Thanks for all your helpful comments. We will tally the results and choose the outcome with the most votes. We appreciate the feedback Best, Judith Sent from my iPad Judith@jhellerstein.com Skype ID: judithhellerstein
On Jan 25, 2017, at 12:53 AM, John More <morej1221@gmail.com> wrote:
After reading the comments, I would agree with the No Vote position.
John More
On Jan 24, 2017, at 8:51 PM, Evan Leibovitch <evanleibovitch@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Glenn.
I support the position that you, Marita, Robert, and many others have taken - against NARALO supporting an appeal of the BCEC's well-considered selection.
- Evan (via mobile)
On 24 Jan 2017, at 15:05, Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com> wrote: Thanks all for casting your opinion . I want to give this more time to allow more people to voice their opinion We are split at the present moment.
Glenn
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Marita Moll <mmoll@ca.inter.net> wrote: I agree with Glenn and others. I don't support a vote at this time.
Marita
On 1/24/2017 1:21 PM, Glenn McKnight wrote:
In my humble opinion I like John More find the processing a bit daunting but that is another reason why we need more clarity.
I think the vetting was done already for the candidates by the committee I have to have confidence they did their job, this this last minute appeal doesn't convince me on the merits of supporting a vote
I don't agree to have a vote
Glenn McKnight
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Folks
Recently I notified the NARALO membership to expect a vote to agree or disagree on including Sebastien Bachollet as a candidate in the slate for the Board seat. Currently only two names are on the slate This week EURALO completed a purpose vote from their ALS's that agreed that he should be included.
The rules require that two additional RALO's must agree PASSIONATELY to expand the slate to include Sebastien
In order to measure our passion on this subject it seems we need to ask the community first on your views on this subject. If we feel passionate to include him then I will direct Ariel to promptly send out the vote.
Please note we have very little time to discuss this situation given the timelines set by the committee. Changes in these processes should be high on the agenda for the next election cycle to reduce this type of confusion
Take a minute and express your opinion on this subject . If the majority of the opinions supports a vote so be it. If the majority is against a vote we will tell the committee that our RALO will not hold a vote, A 'no vote' resulting in no support for adding Sebastien to the slate.
Opinions welcome
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
Thank you all for expressing your opinion. I need to get our opinion to staff immediately so they can proceed. *Summary * We had 12 members expressed their opinions with 4 members in favour of a Vote and 8 members in favour of *No Vote *. Please note you will not be receiving a vote on this issue. Just a heads up, a Big Pulse will be activated on the previous issue on the motion we posted regarding the simple vote for Evan Leibovitch or a vote to abstain, this is the alternate for voting purposes. I will ask Ariel to post this vote soon. Thanks Glenn Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight . On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Judith Hellerstein <judith@jhellerstein.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Thanks for all your helpful comments. We will tally the results and choose the outcome with the most votes. We appreciate the feedback
Best, Judith
Sent from my iPad Judith@jhellerstein.com Skype ID: judithhellerstein
On Jan 25, 2017, at 12:53 AM, John More <morej1221@gmail.com> wrote:
After reading the comments, I would agree with the No Vote position.
John More
On Jan 24, 2017, at 8:51 PM, Evan Leibovitch <evanleibovitch@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Glenn.
I support the position that you, Marita, Robert, and many others have taken - against NARALO supporting an appeal of the BCEC's well-considered selection.
- Evan (via mobile) On 24 Jan 2017, at 15:05, Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks all for casting your opinion . I want to give this more time to allow more people to voice their opinion We are split at the present moment.
Glenn
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Marita Moll <mmoll@ca.inter.net> wrote:
I agree with Glenn and others. I don't support a vote at this time.
Marita
On 1/24/2017 1:21 PM, Glenn McKnight wrote:
In my humble opinion I like John More find the processing a bit daunting but that is another reason why we need more clarity.
I think the vetting was done already for the candidates by the committee I have to have confidence they did their job, this this last minute appeal doesn't convince me on the merits of supporting a vote
I don't agree to have a vote
Glenn McKnight
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Glenn McKnight < mcknight.glenn@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Folks
Recently I notified the NARALO membership to expect a vote to agree or disagree on including Sebastien Bachollet as a candidate in the slate for the Board seat. Currently only two names are on the slate This week EURALO completed a purpose vote from their ALS's that agreed that he should be included.
The rules require that two additional RALO's must agree *PASSIONATELY *to expand the slate to include Sebastien
In order to measure our passion on this subject it seems we need to ask the community *first on your views on this subject*. If we feel passionate to include him then I will direct Ariel to promptly send out the vote.
Please note we have very little time to discuss this situation given the timelines set by the committee. Changes in these processes should be high on the agenda for the next election cycle to reduce this type of confusion
Take a minute and express your opinion on this subject . If the majority of the opinions supports a vote so be it. If the majority is against a vote we will tell the committee that our RALO will not hold a vote, A 'no vote' resulting in no support for adding Sebastien to the slate.
Opinions welcome
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
------ NA-Discuss mailing listNA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
------
NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
Support for Sebastien. He is experienced and professional. Leah Symekher SFBay ISOC Chapter, President/Chair On 1/25/17 5:52 AM, Glenn McKnight wrote:
Thank you all for expressing your opinion. I need to get our opinion to staff immediately so they can proceed. *Summary *
We had 12 members expressed their opinions with 4 members in favour of a Vote and 8 members in favour of *No Vote *. Please note you will not be receiving a vote on this issue.
Just a heads up, a Big Pulse will be activated on the previous issue on the motion we posted regarding the simple vote for Evan Leibovitch or a vote to abstain, this is the alternate for voting purposes. I will ask Ariel to post this vote soon.
Thanks Glenn
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com <mailto:mcknight.glenn@gmail.com> skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Judith Hellerstein <judith@jhellerstein.com <mailto:judith@jhellerstein.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
Thanks for all your helpful comments. We will tally the results and choose the outcome with the most votes. We appreciate the feedback
Best, Judith
Sent from my iPad Judith@jhellerstein.com <mailto:Judith@jhellerstein.com> Skype ID: judithhellerstein
On Jan 25, 2017, at 12:53 AM, John More <morej1221@gmail.com <mailto:morej1221@gmail.com>> wrote:
After reading the comments, I would agree with the No Vote position.
John More
On Jan 24, 2017, at 8:51 PM, Evan Leibovitch <evanleibovitch@gmail.com <mailto:evanleibovitch@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Glenn.
I support the position that you, Marita, Robert, and many others have taken - against NARALO supporting an appeal of the BCEC's well-considered selection.
- Evan (via mobile) On 24 Jan 2017, at 15:05, Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com <mailto:mcknight.glenn@gmail.com>> wrote:
Thanks all for casting your opinion . I want to give this more time to allow more people to voice their opinion We are split at the present moment.
Glenn
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com <mailto:mcknight.glenn@gmail.com> skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Marita Moll <mmoll@ca.inter.net <mailto:mmoll@ca.inter.net>> wrote:
I agree with Glenn and others. I don't support a vote at this time.
Marita
On 1/24/2017 1:21 PM, Glenn McKnight wrote:
In my humble opinion I like John More find the processing a bit daunting but that is another reason why we need more clarity.
I think the vetting was done already for the candidates by the committee I have to have confidence they did their job, this this last minute appeal doesn't convince me on the merits of supporting a vote
I don't agree to have a vote
Glenn McKnight
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com <mailto:mcknight.glenn@gmail.com> skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com <mailto:mcknight.glenn@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Folks
Recently I notified the NARALO membership to expect a vote to agree or disagree on including Sebastien Bachollet as a candidate in the slate for the Board seat. Currently only two names are on the slate This week EURALO completed a purpose vote from their ALS's that agreed that he should be included.
The rules require that two additional RALO's must agree *PASSIONATELY *to expand the slate to include Sebastien
In order to measure our passion on this subject it seems we need to ask the community _*first on your views on this subject*_. If we feel passionate to include him then I will direct Ariel to promptly send out the vote.
Please note we have very little time to discuss this situation given the timelines set by the committee. Changes in these processes should be high on the agenda for the next election cycle to reduce this type of confusion
Take a minute and express your opinion on this subject . If the majority of the opinions supports a vote so be it. If the majority is against a vote we will tell the committee that our RALO will not hold a vote, A 'no vote' resulting in no support for adding Sebastien to the slate.
Opinions welcome
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com <mailto:mcknight.glenn@gmail.com> skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss>
Visit the NARALO online athttp://www.naralo.org <http://www.naralo.org/> ------
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss>
Visit the NARALO online athttp://www.naralo.org <http://www.naralo.org/> ------
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
As pointed out by most I do not understand the purpose or reconsidering something that the Committee in charge reviewed. - Is new information not reviewed by the Committee available? - What are the basis for considering him if we as a body are seeking new insights in the Board and other groups? Just a new guy's perspective! Sent from my "iPad Air" Alfredo Calderón Email: calderon.alfredo@gmail.com Twylah: http://www.twylah.com/acalderon52 Twitter: acalderon52 Skype: Alfredo_1212 Business card: http://myonepage.com/ acalderon Scoop.it: http://www.scoop.it/t/aprendiendo-a-distancia Blog: http://aprendizajedistancia.blogspot.com Twitter news: http://paper.li/ acalderon52
On Jan 24, 2017, at 4:03 PM, Marita Moll <mmoll@ca.inter.net> wrote:
I agree with Glenn and others. I don't support a vote at this time.
Marita
On 1/24/2017 1:21 PM, Glenn McKnight wrote: In my humble opinion I like John More find the processing a bit daunting but that is another reason why we need more clarity.
I think the vetting was done already for the candidates by the committee I have to have confidence they did their job, this this last minute appeal doesn't convince me on the merits of supporting a vote
I don't agree to have a vote
Glenn McKnight
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Folks
Recently I notified the NARALO membership to expect a vote to agree or disagree on including Sebastien Bachollet as a candidate in the slate for the Board seat. Currently only two names are on the slate This week EURALO completed a purpose vote from their ALS's that agreed that he should be included.
The rules require that two additional RALO's must agree PASSIONATELY to expand the slate to include Sebastien
In order to measure our passion on this subject it seems we need to ask the community first on your views on this subject. If we feel passionate to include him then I will direct Ariel to promptly send out the vote.
Please note we have very little time to discuss this situation given the timelines set by the committee. Changes in these processes should be high on the agenda for the next election cycle to reduce this type of confusion
Take a minute and express your opinion on this subject . If the majority of the opinions supports a vote so be it. If the majority is against a vote we will tell the committee that our RALO will not hold a vote, A 'no vote' resulting in no support for adding Sebastien to the slate.
Opinions welcome
Glenn McKnight mcknight.glenn@gmail.com skype gmcknight twitter gmcknight .
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
I have nothing against Sebastien, but he's been around long enough to know how things work. So, sorry, better luck next time. Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
participants (11)
-
Alfredo Calderon -
Evan Leibovitch -
Glenn McKnight -
John More -
John R. Levine -
Joly MacFie -
Judith Hellerstein -
Leah Symekher -
Marita Moll -
Robert Guerra -
Seth M Reiss