If you do ask about carbon neutrality, how about spicing it up by
asking why ICANN (or at least Constituency Travel) so strongly prefers
flying over ground transport. That is, why don't they pay for (long
distance) train or bus travel as an alternative to flying. Besides
being more climate-friendly it would even save ICANN money, and in
many instances it'd be just as fast or even faster than flying.
Tapani
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 04:17:49PM +0200, Raoul Plommer via Npoc-discuss (npoc-discuss@icann.org) wrote:
>
> Dear members,
>
> The ICANN board wants some questions from us. Can you think of some
> relevant ones?
>
> I think 2-3 questions would suffice. If we can only come up with a couple
> of NPOC relevant questions, I think I might include a question about ICANN
> becoming carbon neutral. It would be great if I could receive these
> suggestions by Friday.
>
> -Raoul
--
Tapani Tarvainen
_______________________________________________
Npoc-discuss mailing list
Npoc-discuss@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/npoc-discuss
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.