UPDATE : Continuous Improvement Program Community Coordination Group (CIP-CCG)
Hello Everyone, This working group update is specifically for NPOC Membership but since we usually have or share the same position, I thought is good to share also with NCSG Members to ask for their feedback. This is the first update and I hope to write the second update in a few days time after the content of this email is digested as it promises to be a very long email content. The representation in this group has myself (Caleb) representing NPOC with Wisdom as the NPOC alternate while Manju is NCSG (through the GNSO Council) and Benjamin is NCUC. In case I miss anything, please jump in Manju, Wisdom, and Benjamin. But first, let me introduce what the working group is all about while we seek feedback *What is the Continuous Improvement Program Community Coordination Group (CIP-CCG)?* ICANN's commitment to continuous improvement led to the formation of the CIP-CCG on December 12, 2023. The purpose of the group is to improve the effectiveness of ICANN's Organizational Reviews process. This aligns with ongoing efforts to strengthen ICANN's multistakeholder model. The CIP-CCG will create a framework for continuous improvement within ICANN's Supporting Organizations, Advisory Committees, and Nominating Committee. While this group was formed to help transform ICANN's Organizational Reviews into a Continuous Improvement Program, implementing Recommendation 3.6 from the Third Accountability and Transparency Review (ATRT3) <https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=273454168> was the offshoot of this group formation. Developing this Continuous Improvement Program is part of a broader effort to enhance the effectiveness of ICANN's multistakeholder model, aligning with ICANN's Interim President and CEO's Goal 11 <https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/icann-interim-president-and-ceo-share...> related to refining the review processes. To read more about this check this link <https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/icann-reviews-program-update-and-inte...> *The key responsibilities of the CIP-CCG are:* 1. Establish a shared understanding of what "continuous improvement" means in the context of ATRT3's Recommendation 3.6. 2. Evaluate different methodologies for effective Continuous Improvement Programs. 3. Agree on the methodology best suited for ICANN's purposes. 4. Formulate a Continuous Improvement Program Framework to be used by ICANN's Supporting Organizations, Advisory Committees, and the Nominating Committee. * ICANN Principles of Continuous Improvement to NPOC (But relevant and same content for NCUC/NCSG)* Historically, ICANN Organizational Reviews have asked whether the Supporting Organizations (SOs), Advisory Committees (ACs), and the Nominating Committee (NomCom) have a continuing purpose within the ICANN community. Rather than articulating this as a single principle, ICANN org proposes it as an overarching consideration that is addressed through five separate principles that would guide the successful execution of the Continuous Improvement Program (CIP). 1. Principle 1: The SO/AC is fulfilling its purpose. 2. Principle 2: The structure of the SO/AC is effective. 3. Principle 3: Are the operations of SO/AC are efficient? 4. Principle 4: Is the SO/AC is accountable internally to its stakeholders, and externally to the wider ICANN community? 5. Principle 5: The ICANN community collaborates to further the mission of ICANN and the effectiveness of the ICANN multistakeholder model. We have been tasked to ask the community for some feedback. While I hope to collate some of your thoughts and take back to the WG. To make this email brief, I will break this email into several parts for us to digest the content while I post other updates in a day or two from now. *Caleb Ogundele* Email: muyiwacaleb@gmail.com
Weldone Caleb and team Thanks for sharing as we look forward to more details. ___________________ REMMY NWEKE, *mNUJ, mNGE, mGOCOP* Lead Consulting Strategist/Group Executive Editor, *ITREALMS Media* group [*Multiple-award winning medium*] (ITREALMS <http://www.itrealms.com.ng/>, DigitalSENSE Business Magazine <http://www.digitalsenseafrica.com.ng/businessnews>; NaijaAgroNet <http://www.naijaagronet.com.ng/>) No. 36 Afariogun Street, Oshodi-Lagos M: 234-8033592762, 8023122558, T: @ITRealms <http://www.twitter.com/ITRealms> @DigitalSENSEng 2023 *Nigeria DigitalSENSE Forum on IG4D*, Thursday June 8 <https://www.itrealms.com.ng/> 2023 *ITREALMS* e-Waste Dialogue, Thursday December 7 <https://www.itrealms.com.ng/> @Welcome Center Hotels, Int'l Airport Road, Lagos-Nigeria <http://welcomecentrehotels.com/> Former Vice President, African Civil Society on Information Society (ACSIS) ______________________________________________________________ *Confidentiality Notice:* The information in this document and attachments are confidential and may also be privileged information. It is intended only for the use of the named recipient. Remmy Nweke does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately, then delete this document and do not disclose the contents of this document to any other person, nor make any copies. Violators may face court persecution. On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 7:02 PM Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele via Npoc-discuss < npoc-discuss@icann.org> wrote:
Hello Everyone, This working group update is specifically for NPOC Membership but since we usually have or share the same position, I thought is good to share also with NCSG Members to ask for their feedback. This is the first update and I hope to write the second update in a few days time after the content of this email is digested as it promises to be a very long email content.
The representation in this group has myself (Caleb) representing NPOC with Wisdom as the NPOC alternate while Manju is NCSG (through the GNSO Council) and Benjamin is NCUC. In case I miss anything, please jump in Manju, Wisdom, and Benjamin. But first, let me introduce what the working group is all about while we seek feedback
*What is the Continuous Improvement Program Community Coordination Group (CIP-CCG)?* ICANN's commitment to continuous improvement led to the formation of the CIP-CCG on December 12, 2023. The purpose of the group is to improve the effectiveness of ICANN's Organizational Reviews process. This aligns with ongoing efforts to strengthen ICANN's multistakeholder model. The CIP-CCG will create a framework for continuous improvement within ICANN's Supporting Organizations, Advisory Committees, and Nominating Committee. While this group was formed to help transform ICANN's Organizational Reviews into a Continuous Improvement Program, implementing Recommendation 3.6 from the Third Accountability and Transparency Review (ATRT3) <https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=273454168> was the offshoot of this group formation. Developing this Continuous Improvement Program is part of a broader effort to enhance the effectiveness of ICANN's multistakeholder model, aligning with ICANN's Interim President and CEO's Goal 11 <https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/icann-interim-president-and-ceo-share...> related to refining the review processes. To read more about this check this link <https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/icann-reviews-program-update-and-inte...>
*The key responsibilities of the CIP-CCG are:*
1. Establish a shared understanding of what "continuous improvement" means in the context of ATRT3's Recommendation 3.6. 2. Evaluate different methodologies for effective Continuous Improvement Programs. 3. Agree on the methodology best suited for ICANN's purposes. 4. Formulate a Continuous Improvement Program Framework to be used by ICANN's Supporting Organizations, Advisory Committees, and the Nominating Committee.
* ICANN Principles of Continuous Improvement to NPOC (But relevant and same content for NCUC/NCSG)* Historically, ICANN Organizational Reviews have asked whether the Supporting Organizations (SOs), Advisory Committees (ACs), and the Nominating Committee (NomCom) have a continuing purpose within the ICANN community. Rather than articulating this as a single principle, ICANN org proposes it as an overarching consideration that is addressed through five separate principles that would guide the successful execution of the Continuous Improvement Program (CIP).
1. Principle 1: The SO/AC is fulfilling its purpose. 2. Principle 2: The structure of the SO/AC is effective. 3. Principle 3: Are the operations of SO/AC are efficient? 4. Principle 4: Is the SO/AC is accountable internally to its stakeholders, and externally to the wider ICANN community? 5. Principle 5: The ICANN community collaborates to further the mission of ICANN and the effectiveness of the ICANN multistakeholder model.
We have been tasked to ask the community for some feedback. While I hope to collate some of your thoughts and take back to the WG.
To make this email brief, I will break this email into several parts for us to digest the content while I post other updates in a day or two from now. *Caleb Ogundele* Email: muyiwacaleb@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Npoc-discuss mailing list Npoc-discuss@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/npoc-discuss _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
In anticipation of having staff socialize this working group's core mission during the NCSG membership session, I wanted to do a follow-up on these principles while welcoming your feedback. Regards Caleb On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 1:02 PM Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele < muyiwacaleb@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Everyone, This working group update is specifically for NPOC Membership but since we usually have or share the same position, I thought is good to share also with NCSG Members to ask for their feedback. This is the first update and I hope to write the second update in a few days time after the content of this email is digested as it promises to be a very long email content.
The representation in this group has myself (Caleb) representing NPOC with Wisdom as the NPOC alternate while Manju is NCSG (through the GNSO Council) and Benjamin is NCUC. In case I miss anything, please jump in Manju, Wisdom, and Benjamin. But first, let me introduce what the working group is all about while we seek feedback
*What is the Continuous Improvement Program Community Coordination Group (CIP-CCG)?* ICANN's commitment to continuous improvement led to the formation of the CIP-CCG on December 12, 2023. The purpose of the group is to improve the effectiveness of ICANN's Organizational Reviews process. This aligns with ongoing efforts to strengthen ICANN's multistakeholder model. The CIP-CCG will create a framework for continuous improvement within ICANN's Supporting Organizations, Advisory Committees, and Nominating Committee. While this group was formed to help transform ICANN's Organizational Reviews into a Continuous Improvement Program, implementing Recommendation 3.6 from the Third Accountability and Transparency Review (ATRT3) <https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=273454168> was the offshoot of this group formation. Developing this Continuous Improvement Program is part of a broader effort to enhance the effectiveness of ICANN's multistakeholder model, aligning with ICANN's Interim President and CEO's Goal 11 <https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/icann-interim-president-and-ceo-share...> related to refining the review processes. To read more about this check this link <https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/icann-reviews-program-update-and-inte...>
*The key responsibilities of the CIP-CCG are:*
1. Establish a shared understanding of what "continuous improvement" means in the context of ATRT3's Recommendation 3.6. 2. Evaluate different methodologies for effective Continuous Improvement Programs. 3. Agree on the methodology best suited for ICANN's purposes. 4. Formulate a Continuous Improvement Program Framework to be used by ICANN's Supporting Organizations, Advisory Committees, and the Nominating Committee.
* ICANN Principles of Continuous Improvement to NPOC (But relevant and same content for NCUC/NCSG)* Historically, ICANN Organizational Reviews have asked whether the Supporting Organizations (SOs), Advisory Committees (ACs), and the Nominating Committee (NomCom) have a continuing purpose within the ICANN community. Rather than articulating this as a single principle, ICANN org proposes it as an overarching consideration that is addressed through five separate principles that would guide the successful execution of the Continuous Improvement Program (CIP).
1. Principle 1: The SO/AC is fulfilling its purpose. 2. Principle 2: The structure of the SO/AC is effective. 3. Principle 3: Are the operations of SO/AC are efficient? 4. Principle 4: Is the SO/AC is accountable internally to its stakeholders, and externally to the wider ICANN community? 5. Principle 5: The ICANN community collaborates to further the mission of ICANN and the effectiveness of the ICANN multistakeholder model.
We have been tasked to ask the community for some feedback. While I hope to collate some of your thoughts and take back to the WG.
To make this email brief, I will break this email into several parts for us to digest the content while I post other updates in a day or two from now. *Caleb Ogundele* Email: muyiwacaleb@gmail.com
-- *Caleb Ogundele* Email: muyiwacaleb@gmail.com
participants (2)
-
Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele -
Remmy Nweke