Dear members, Following you will find the Public Comments Open to any of you get involved with this important support. Those are currently open as a Draft from Non-Commercial Stakeholder Groups and your input could be very valuable. Let us know if you are interested on join in to one or more comments. CCWG-Accountability WS2 Final Report <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-acct-ws2-final-2018-03-30-en> 11th May Open This Public Comment seeks community input on whether there are any inconsistencies1 <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-acct-ws2-final-2018-03-30-en#foot...> between the various sets of recommendations within the Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability's (CCWG-Accountability) final report from its Work Stream 2 (WS2). The CCWG-Accountability WS2 final report is a compilation of eight reports generated through individual sub-groups of the CCWG-Accountability, each of which has already been the subject of public comment. These eight reports are on the topics identified at Section 27.1. of the ICANN Bylaws2 <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-acct-ws2-final-2018-03-30-en#foot...>, which defined WS2. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fOUFHiTEvgafKYUfqWpUlX1QUGM_5jp0Yjdd6j1x...> Draft Final Report of the NomCom2 Review <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/nomcom2-review-2018-03-27-en> 7th May Open Analysis Group, the independent examiner that is conducting the NomCom2 Review, has published its Draft Final Report for public comment. The Draft Final Report contains both an assessment of the Nominating Committee and recommendations for improving its operations.This public comment proceeding follows the publication of the Assessment Report <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2018-01-10-en>, which included findings that were discussed with the community via several consultations. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lBL_xRnYeIzQYXjK4nw0P8b7_cEOOuZVNouzdp3u...> Proposed Revisions to Bylaws Section 11 – Additional Voting Thresholds <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/bylaws-section11-voting-2018-03-26-en> 5th May Open Following the close of the public comment forum and after taking public comments into account, the Board will consider the proposed changes to article 11 - Generic Names Supporting Organization of the ICANN Bylaws for adoption. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/13SPMM0k3n29RxvNXRmUcwSeIOtXWRgiEEI4WWaFT...> ICANN Reserve Fund: Proposed Replenishment Strategy <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/reserve-fund-replenishment-2018-03-06-...> 25th April Open A first public comment process held in October/November 2017 sought input on the rationale and target level of the Reserve Fund. It led the ICANN Board to develop further the previous rationale of the Reserve Fund and confirmed its target level to a minimum of 12 months of Operating Expenses. Now that the target level is confirmed, a replenishment strategy is needed to bring the Reserve Fund from its current level (approximately six months of Operating Expenses) to its minimum target level of 12 months. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BHC2ri85J6BlJgviRF6uGQJCYWj3pBaLLRKmBFzH...> Draft Project Plan for the Proposed Name Collision Analysis Project (NCAP) <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ncap-project-plan-2018-03-02-en> 18th April Open The NCAP Work Party plans to present the draft project plan at ICANN 61 to facilitate community discussion and gather input. Upon completion of the public comment period, the NCAP Work Party will finalize the project plan and submit it to the full SSAC to obtain consensus, and subsequently, submit a consensus plan to the ICANN Board. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WVaunyKcFLRoiOL989ZnrawRV0k4zG8L61hKBlxy...> Uniform Board Member Integrity Screening Process <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/board-integrity-screening-2018-03-02-e...> 17th April Open This public comment proceeding seeks community input on the recommendation that Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees that do not currently employ a due diligence integrity screening process similar to the Nominating Committee adopt the proposed Uniform Board Member Integrity Screening Process <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-uniform-board-integrity...> [PDF, 43 KB] to conduct due diligence on the candidates selected to serve on the ICANN Board. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YS4ZCtcD_dOlP6va1aInp0XuS4l7tunhQBgdFzMh...> Kind Regards, NPOC Executive Committee
Thank you so much Juan for this reminder. Indeed, NPOC folk such a periodical reminder and more attention. Let's keep this great job ! Warm regards Olevie 2018-04-03 23:00 GMT+00:00 Juan Manuel Rojas <juan@npoc.org>:
Dear members, Following you will find the Public Comments Open to any of you get involved with this important support. Those are currently open as a Draft from Non-Commercial Stakeholder Groups and your input could be very valuable. Let us know if you are interested on join in to one or more comments.
CCWG-Accountability WS2 Final Report <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-acct-ws2-final-2018-03-30-en> 11th May Open This Public Comment seeks community input on whether there are any inconsistencies1 <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-acct-ws2-final-2018-03-30-en#foot...> between the various sets of recommendations within the Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability's (CCWG-Accountability) final report from its Work Stream 2 (WS2). The CCWG-Accountability WS2 final report is a compilation of eight reports generated through individual sub-groups of the CCWG-Accountability, each of which has already been the subject of public comment. These eight reports are on the topics identified at Section 27.1. of the ICANN Bylaws2 <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-acct-ws2-final-2018-03-30-en#foot...>, which defined WS2. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fOUFHiTEvgafKYUfqWpUlX1QUGM_5jp0Yjdd6j1x...> Draft Final Report of the NomCom2 Review <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/nomcom2-review-2018-03-27-en> 7th May Open Analysis Group, the independent examiner that is conducting the NomCom2 Review, has published its Draft Final Report for public comment. The Draft Final Report contains both an assessment of the Nominating Committee and recommendations for improving its operations.This public comment proceeding follows the publication of the Assessment Report <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2018-01-10-en>, which included findings that were discussed with the community via several consultations. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lBL_xRnYeIzQYXjK4nw0P8b7_cEOOuZVNouzdp3u...> Proposed Revisions to Bylaws Section 11 – Additional Voting Thresholds <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/bylaws-section11-voting-2018-03-26-en> 5th May Open Following the close of the public comment forum and after taking public comments into account, the Board will consider the proposed changes to article 11 - Generic Names Supporting Organization of the ICANN Bylaws for adoption. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/13SPMM0k3n29RxvNXRmUcwSeIOtXWRgiEEI4WWaFT...> ICANN Reserve Fund: Proposed Replenishment Strategy <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/reserve-fund-replenishment-2018-03-06-...> 25th April Open A first public comment process held in October/November 2017 sought input on the rationale and target level of the Reserve Fund. It led the ICANN Board to develop further the previous rationale of the Reserve Fund and confirmed its target level to a minimum of 12 months of Operating Expenses. Now that the target level is confirmed, a replenishment strategy is needed to bring the Reserve Fund from its current level (approximately six months of Operating Expenses) to its minimum target level of 12 months. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BHC2ri85J6BlJgviRF6uGQJCYWj3pBaLLRKmBFzH...> Draft Project Plan for the Proposed Name Collision Analysis Project (NCAP) <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ncap-project-plan-2018-03-02-en> 18th April Open
The NCAP Work Party plans to present the draft project plan at ICANN 61 to facilitate community discussion and gather input. Upon completion of the public comment period, the NCAP Work Party will finalize the project plan and submit it to the full SSAC to obtain consensus, and subsequently, submit a consensus plan to the ICANN Board. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WVaunyKcFLRoiOL989ZnrawRV0k4zG8L61hKBlxy...> Uniform Board Member Integrity Screening Process <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/board-integrity-screening-2018-03-02-e...> 17th April Open This public comment proceeding seeks community input on the recommendation that Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees that do not currently employ a due diligence integrity screening process similar to the Nominating Committee adopt the proposed Uniform Board Member Integrity Screening Process <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-uniform-board-integrity...> [PDF, 43 KB] to conduct due diligence on the candidates selected to serve on the ICANN Board. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YS4ZCtcD_dOlP6va1aInp0XuS4l7tunhQBgdFzMh...> Kind Regards,
NPOC Executive Committee
_______________________________________________ Npoc-discuss mailing list Npoc-discuss@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/npoc-discuss
-- Ayaovi Olévié Agbenyo KOUAMI* Consultant & Formateur Senior en T.I.C. CEO de l'INTIC4DEV (Institut ds TIC pour le développement) CTO du FOSSFA (http://www.fossfa.net) Eminent National Expert for the WSA (http://www.wsis-award.org) Membre de l'ICANN (http://www.icann.org) Membre de l'Internet Society (http://www.isoc.org) *Skype : olevie1 FaceBook : @olivier.kouami.7 Twitter : #oleviek Lomé – Togo
Wow, That’s an amazing piece of communication! NPOC Members, if anyone wants to do a comment or just review what’s out there, I can help you understand the topics of the open public comments and navigate the process to do one or more. This is a very useful and costless way to participate in the ICANN process, comments can be one paragraph or several pages and have no special request, they can be done by anyone and don’t need special endorsements. Although, if your comment is shared among all members of NPOC I am sure it could be submitted as a Constituency comment, which add power to it. Cheers to all, Martín Silva GNSO Councilor
On 3 Apr 2018, at 20:00, Juan Manuel Rojas <juan@npoc.org> wrote:
<image.png>
Dear members, Following you will find the Public Comments Open to any of you get involved with this important support. Those are currently open as a Draft from Non-Commercial Stakeholder Groups and your input could be very valuable. Let us know if you are interested on join in to one or more comments.
CCWG-Accountability WS2 Final Report <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-acct-ws2-final-2018-03-30-en> 11th May Open This Public Comment seeks community input on whether there are any inconsistencies1 <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-acct-ws2-final-2018-03-30-en#foot...> between the various sets of recommendations within the Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability's (CCWG-Accountability) final report from its Work Stream 2 (WS2). The CCWG-Accountability WS2 final report is a compilation of eight reports generated through individual sub-groups of the CCWG-Accountability, each of which has already been the subject of public comment. These eight reports are on the topics identified at Section 27.1. of the ICANN Bylaws2 <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-acct-ws2-final-2018-03-30-en#foot...>, which defined WS2. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fOUFHiTEvgafKYUfqWpUlX1QUGM_5jp0Yjdd6j1x...> Draft Final Report of the NomCom2 Review <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/nomcom2-review-2018-03-27-en> 7th May Open Analysis Group, the independent examiner that is conducting the NomCom2 Review, has published its Draft Final Report for public comment. The Draft Final Report contains both an assessment of the Nominating Committee and recommendations for improving its operations.This public comment proceeding follows the publication of the Assessment Report <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2018-01-10-en>, which included findings that were discussed with the community via several consultations. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lBL_xRnYeIzQYXjK4nw0P8b7_cEOOuZVNouzdp3u...> Proposed Revisions to Bylaws Section 11 – Additional Voting Thresholds <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/bylaws-section11-voting-2018-03-26-en> 5th May Open Following the close of the public comment forum and after taking public comments into account, the Board will consider the proposed changes to article 11 - Generic Names Supporting Organization of the ICANN Bylaws for adoption. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/13SPMM0k3n29RxvNXRmUcwSeIOtXWRgiEEI4WWaFT...> ICANN Reserve Fund: Proposed Replenishment Strategy <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/reserve-fund-replenishment-2018-03-06-...> 25th April Open A first public comment process held in October/November 2017 sought input on the rationale and target level of the Reserve Fund. It led the ICANN Board to develop further the previous rationale of the Reserve Fund and confirmed its target level to a minimum of 12 months of Operating Expenses. Now that the target level is confirmed, a replenishment strategy is needed to bring the Reserve Fund from its current level (approximately six months of Operating Expenses) to its minimum target level of 12 months. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BHC2ri85J6BlJgviRF6uGQJCYWj3pBaLLRKmBFzH...> Draft Project Plan for the Proposed Name Collision Analysis Project (NCAP) <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ncap-project-plan-2018-03-02-en> 18th April Open The NCAP Work Party plans to present the draft project plan at ICANN 61 to facilitate community discussion and gather input. Upon completion of the public comment period, the NCAP Work Party will finalize the project plan and submit it to the full SSAC to obtain consensus, and subsequently, submit a consensus plan to the ICANN Board. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WVaunyKcFLRoiOL989ZnrawRV0k4zG8L61hKBlxy...> Uniform Board Member Integrity Screening Process <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/board-integrity-screening-2018-03-02-e...> 17th April Open This public comment proceeding seeks community input on the recommendation that Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees that do not currently employ a due diligence integrity screening process similar to the Nominating Committee adopt the proposed Uniform Board Member Integrity Screening Process <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-uniform-board-integrity...> [PDF, 43 KB] to conduct due diligence on the candidates selected to serve on the ICANN Board. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YS4ZCtcD_dOlP6va1aInp0XuS4l7tunhQBgdFzMh...> Kind Regards,
NPOC Executive Committee <image.png>
_______________________________________________ Npoc-discuss mailing list Npoc-discuss@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/npoc-discuss
Hi Martin and all. +1 @Martin. I'm very proud of you for your actual level of knowledge of the ICANN processes and procedures in such a short time ! Thank you for been always avialable to help. I'm inviting the members too, to cease this occasion and don't Martin never sleep again ;-))) Warm regards and kudos to you too. Cheers ! Olevie 2018-04-03 23:05 GMT+00:00 Martin Pablo Silva Valent < mpsilvavalent@gmail.com>:
Wow, That’s an amazing piece of communication!
NPOC Members, if anyone wants to do a comment or just review what’s out there, I can help you understand the topics of the open public comments and navigate the process to do one or more. This is a very useful and costless way to participate in the ICANN process, comments can be one paragraph or several pages and have no special request, they can be done by anyone and don’t need special endorsements. Although, if your comment is shared among all members of NPOC I am sure it could be submitted as a Constituency comment, which add power to it.
Cheers to all,
Martín Silva GNSO Councilor
On 3 Apr 2018, at 20:00, Juan Manuel Rojas <juan@npoc.org> wrote:
<image.png>
Dear members, Following you will find the Public Comments Open to any of you get involved with this important support. Those are currently open as a Draft from Non-Commercial Stakeholder Groups and your input could be very valuable. Let us know if you are interested on join in to one or more comments.
CCWG-Accountability WS2 Final Report <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-acct-ws2-final-2018-03-30-en> 11th May Open This Public Comment seeks community input on whether there are any inconsistencies1 <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-acct-ws2-final-2018-03-30-en#foot...> between the various sets of recommendations within the Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability's (CCWG-Accountability) final report from its Work Stream 2 (WS2). The CCWG-Accountability WS2 final report is a compilation of eight reports generated through individual sub-groups of the CCWG-Accountability, each of which has already been the subject of public comment. These eight reports are on the topics identified at Section 27.1. of the ICANN Bylaws2 <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-acct-ws2-final-2018-03-30-en#foot...>, which defined WS2. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fOUFHiTEvgafKYUfqWpUlX1QUGM_5jp0Yjdd6j1x...> Draft Final Report of the NomCom2 Review <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/nomcom2-review-2018-03-27-en> 7th May Open Analysis Group, the independent examiner that is conducting the NomCom2 Review, has published its Draft Final Report for public comment. The Draft Final Report contains both an assessment of the Nominating Committee and recommendations for improving its operations.This public comment proceeding follows the publication of the Assessment Report <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2018-01-10-en>, which included findings that were discussed with the community via several consultations. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lBL_xRnYeIzQYXjK4nw0P8b7_cEOOuZVNouzdp3u...> Proposed Revisions to Bylaws Section 11 – Additional Voting Thresholds <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/bylaws-section11-voting-2018-03-26-en> 5th May Open Following the close of the public comment forum and after taking public comments into account, the Board will consider the proposed changes to article 11 - Generic Names Supporting Organization of the ICANN Bylaws for adoption. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/13SPMM0k3n29RxvNXRmUcwSeIOtXWRgiEEI4WWaFT...> ICANN Reserve Fund: Proposed Replenishment Strategy <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/reserve-fund-replenishment-2018-03-06-...> 25th April Open A first public comment process held in October/November 2017 sought input on the rationale and target level of the Reserve Fund. It led the ICANN Board to develop further the previous rationale of the Reserve Fund and confirmed its target level to a minimum of 12 months of Operating Expenses. Now that the target level is confirmed, a replenishment strategy is needed to bring the Reserve Fund from its current level (approximately six months of Operating Expenses) to its minimum target level of 12 months. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BHC2ri85J6BlJgviRF6uGQJCYWj3pBaLLRKmBFzH...> Draft Project Plan for the Proposed Name Collision Analysis Project (NCAP) <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ncap-project-plan-2018-03-02-en> 18th April Open The NCAP Work Party plans to present the draft project plan at ICANN 61 to facilitate community discussion and gather input. Upon completion of the public comment period, the NCAP Work Party will finalize the project plan and submit it to the full SSAC to obtain consensus, and subsequently, submit a consensus plan to the ICANN Board. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WVaunyKcFLRoiOL989ZnrawRV0k4zG8L61hKBlxy...> Uniform Board Member Integrity Screening Process <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/board-integrity-screening-2018-03-02-e...> 17th April Open This public comment proceeding seeks community input on the recommendation that Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees that do not currently employ a due diligence integrity screening process similar to the Nominating Committee adopt the proposed Uniform Board Member Integrity Screening Process <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-uniform-board-integrity...> [PDF, 43 KB] to conduct due diligence on the candidates selected to serve on the ICANN Board. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YS4ZCtcD_dOlP6va1aInp0XuS4l7tunhQBgdFzMh...> Kind Regards,
NPOC Executive Committee <image.png>
_______________________________________________ Npoc-discuss mailing list Npoc-discuss@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/npoc-discuss
_______________________________________________ Npoc-discuss mailing list Npoc-discuss@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/npoc-discuss
-- Ayaovi Olévié Agbenyo KOUAMI* Consultant & Formateur Senior en T.I.C. CEO de l'INTIC4DEV (Institut ds TIC pour le développement) CTO du FOSSFA (http://www.fossfa.net) Eminent National Expert for the WSA (http://www.wsis-award.org) Membre de l'ICANN (http://www.icann.org) Membre de l'Internet Society (http://www.isoc.org) *Skype : olevie1 FaceBook : @olivier.kouami.7 Twitter : #oleviek Lomé – Togo
I can work for the NomCom one, as well as the replenishment strategy of the reserve fund. Thanks for a very informative communication Juan! :) -Raoul On 4 April 2018 at 02:14, Olévié Kouami <olivierkouami@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Martin and all. +1 @Martin. I'm very proud of you for your actual level of knowledge of the ICANN processes and procedures in such a short time ! Thank you for been always avialable to help. I'm inviting the members too, to cease this occasion and don't Martin never sleep again ;-))) Warm regards and kudos to you too. Cheers ! Olevie
2018-04-03 23:05 GMT+00:00 Martin Pablo Silva Valent < mpsilvavalent@gmail.com>:
Wow, That’s an amazing piece of communication!
NPOC Members, if anyone wants to do a comment or just review what’s out there, I can help you understand the topics of the open public comments and navigate the process to do one or more. This is a very useful and costless way to participate in the ICANN process, comments can be one paragraph or several pages and have no special request, they can be done by anyone and don’t need special endorsements. Although, if your comment is shared among all members of NPOC I am sure it could be submitted as a Constituency comment, which add power to it.
Cheers to all,
Martín Silva GNSO Councilor
On 3 Apr 2018, at 20:00, Juan Manuel Rojas <juan@npoc.org> wrote:
<image.png>
Dear members, Following you will find the Public Comments Open to any of you get involved with this important support. Those are currently open as a Draft from Non-Commercial Stakeholder Groups and your input could be very valuable. Let us know if you are interested on join in to one or more comments.
CCWG-Accountability WS2 Final Report <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-acct-ws2-final-2018-03-30-en> 11th May Open This Public Comment seeks community input on whether there are any inconsistencies1 <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-acct-ws2-final-2018-03-30-en#foot...> between the various sets of recommendations within the Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability's (CCWG-Accountability) final report from its Work Stream 2 (WS2). The CCWG-Accountability WS2 final report is a compilation of eight reports generated through individual sub-groups of the CCWG-Accountability, each of which has already been the subject of public comment. These eight reports are on the topics identified at Section 27.1. of the ICANN Bylaws2 <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-acct-ws2-final-2018-03-30-en#foot...>, which defined WS2. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fOUFHiTEvgafKYUfqWpUlX1QUGM_5jp0Yjdd6j1x...> Draft Final Report of the NomCom2 Review <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/nomcom2-review-2018-03-27-en> 7th May Open Analysis Group, the independent examiner that is conducting the NomCom2 Review, has published its Draft Final Report for public comment. The Draft Final Report contains both an assessment of the Nominating Committee and recommendations for improving its operations.This public comment proceeding follows the publication of the Assessment Report <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2018-01-10-en>, which included findings that were discussed with the community via several consultations. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lBL_xRnYeIzQYXjK4nw0P8b7_cEOOuZVNouzdp3u...> Proposed Revisions to Bylaws Section 11 – Additional Voting Thresholds <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/bylaws-section11-voting-2018-03-26-en> 5th May Open Following the close of the public comment forum and after taking public comments into account, the Board will consider the proposed changes to article 11 - Generic Names Supporting Organization of the ICANN Bylaws for adoption. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/13SPMM0k3n29RxvNXRmUcwSeIOtXWRgiEEI4WWaFT...> ICANN Reserve Fund: Proposed Replenishment Strategy <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/reserve-fund-replenishment-2018-03-06-...> 25th April Open A first public comment process held in October/November 2017 sought input on the rationale and target level of the Reserve Fund. It led the ICANN Board to develop further the previous rationale of the Reserve Fund and confirmed its target level to a minimum of 12 months of Operating Expenses. Now that the target level is confirmed, a replenishment strategy is needed to bring the Reserve Fund from its current level (approximately six months of Operating Expenses) to its minimum target level of 12 months. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BHC2ri85J6BlJgviRF6uGQJCYWj3pBaLLRKmBFzH...> Draft Project Plan for the Proposed Name Collision Analysis Project (NCAP) <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ncap-project-plan-2018-03-02-en> 18th April Open The NCAP Work Party plans to present the draft project plan at ICANN 61 to facilitate community discussion and gather input. Upon completion of the public comment period, the NCAP Work Party will finalize the project plan and submit it to the full SSAC to obtain consensus, and subsequently, submit a consensus plan to the ICANN Board. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WVaunyKcFLRoiOL989ZnrawRV0k4zG8L61hKBlxy...> Uniform Board Member Integrity Screening Process <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/board-integrity-screening-2018-03-02-e...> 17th April Open This public comment proceeding seeks community input on the recommendation that Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees that do not currently employ a due diligence integrity screening process similar to the Nominating Committee adopt the proposed Uniform Board Member Integrity Screening Process <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-uniform-board-integrity...> [PDF, 43 KB] to conduct due diligence on the candidates selected to serve on the ICANN Board. NCSG Draft <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YS4ZCtcD_dOlP6va1aInp0XuS4l7tunhQBgdFzMh...> Kind Regards,
NPOC Executive Committee <image.png>
_______________________________________________ Npoc-discuss mailing list Npoc-discuss@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/npoc-discuss
_______________________________________________ Npoc-discuss mailing list Npoc-discuss@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/npoc-discuss
-- Ayaovi Olévié Agbenyo KOUAMI* Consultant & Formateur Senior en T.I.C. CEO de l'INTIC4DEV (Institut ds TIC pour le développement) CTO du FOSSFA (http://www.fossfa.net) Eminent National Expert for the WSA (http://www.wsis-award.org) Membre de l'ICANN (http://www.icann.org) Membre de l'Internet Society (http://www.isoc.org) *Skype : olevie1 FaceBook : @olivier.kouami.7 Twitter : #oleviek Lomé – Togo
_______________________________________________ Npoc-discuss mailing list Npoc-discuss@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/npoc-discuss
participants (4)
-
Juan Manuel Rojas -
Martin Pablo Silva Valent -
Olévié Kouami -
Raoul Plommer