One last review before sending our charter to ICANN staff
Dear members of NPOC, Our new charter is finally at the stage, where we will send it to staff to do their own review. Here it is: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HRcUOxtoMUzJnfXhXm-wpJd3vDmVRG9uFTRyojOA... If no new comments have arrived to it by Friday (25.10.), we'll send it off to staff before our F2F meeting in Montreal. The only bit that was changed since the last iteration, was the mission. Here's the new version: "1.2 NPOC’s mission is to represent Not-for-Profit Organizations by addressing their operational concerns with the generic Top-level Domains (gTLDs). Operational Concerns are defined as issues arising from the use of the gTLDs by the not-for-profit organizations to achieve their own mission. Those can include but are not limited to Domain Name Fraud, Intellectual Property Abuse, Privacy, Security, Stability, and Resiliency, as well as transparent registration process and pricing and continued ownership of domain names." The only change to it from older versions was the highlighted part "process and pricing", as we felt it'd be good to specify what kind of transparency we'd want. Supposedly, without the specification, one could think we'd want the registrants' information to be public. That's not what we want. -Raoul
As NPOC treasurer (no funds) and NPOC delegate to the NCSG Finance Committee (no funds) I support the proposed Charter wording. Sam L. Quoting Raoul Plommer <plommer@gmail.com>:
Dear members of NPOC,
Our new charter is finally at the stage, where we will send it to staff to do their own review. Here it is:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HRcUOxtoMUzJnfXhXm-wpJd3vDmVRG9uFTRyojOA...
If no new comments have arrived to it by Friday (25.10.), we'll send it off to staff before our F2F meeting in Montreal.
The only bit that was changed since the last iteration, was the mission. Here's the new version:
"1.2 NPOCâs mission is to represent Not-for-Profit Organizations by addressing their operational concerns with the generic Top-level Domains (gTLDs). Operational Concerns are defined as issues arising from the use of the gTLDs by the not-for-profit organizations to achieve their own mission. Those can include but are not limited to Domain Name Fraud, Intellectual Property Abuse, Privacy, Security, Stability, and Resiliency, as well as transparent registration process and pricing and continued ownership of domain names."
The only change to it from older versions was the highlighted part "process and pricing", as we felt it'd be good to specify what kind of transparency we'd want. Supposedly, without the specification, one could think we'd want the registrants' information to be public. That's not what we want.
-Raoul
---------------------------------------------- "It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured in an unjust state" -Confucius ---------------------------------------------- Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar) Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3 email: Lanfran@Yorku.ca Skype: slanfranco blog: http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com Phone: 613 476-0429 cell: 416-816-2852
Hello Raoul! Thanks for your efforts. I understand the importance of a transparent registration process. And of course, pricing is a key element not only for the initial registration but also for maintaining the domain over time. What I don't fully grasp is putting both together with an "and" in the middle. I don't have an alternative suggestion at the time but can think of a better structure of what you have already stated: <<<We want to encompass all operational concerns, including all * technical (Registration, Security, Stability, and Resiliency), *legal (Domain Name Fraud, Intellectual Property Abuse, Privacy), * and economic (initial Pricing and renewal conditions) implications of registering, holding and using TLDs for the stated purposes of non-profits >>> For what it is worth --- Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez carlosraul@gutierrez.se +506 8837 7176 Aparatado 1571-1000 COSTA RICA El 2019-10-21 08:37, Raoul Plommer escribió:
Dear members of NPOC,
Our new charter is finally at the stage, where we will send it to staff to do their own review. Here it is: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HRcUOxtoMUzJnfXhXm-wpJd3vDmVRG9uFTRyojOA...
If no new comments have arrived to it by Friday (25.10.), we'll send it off to staff before our F2F meeting in Montreal.
The only bit that was changed since the last iteration, was the mission. Here's the new version:
"1.2 NPOC's mission is to represent Not-for-Profit Organizations by addressing their operational concerns with the generic Top-level Domains (gTLDs). Operational Concerns are defined as issues arising from the use of the gTLDs by the not-for-profit organizations to achieve their own mission. Those can include but are not limited to Domain Name Fraud, Intellectual Property Abuse, Privacy, Security, Stability, and Resiliency, as well as transparent registration process and pricing and continued ownership of domain names."
The only change to it from older versions was the highlighted part "process and pricing", as we felt it'd be good to specify what kind of transparency we'd want. Supposedly, without the specification, one could think we'd want the registrants' information to be public. That's not what we want.
-Raoul _______________________________________________ Npoc-discuss mailing list Npoc-discuss@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/npoc-discuss _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Great job everyone, I think it is good to go! 🙂(made very minor formatting corrections). Ioana Stupariu SJD Candidate - International Business Law -------------------------------------------------------- Central European University Department of Legal Studies Nador u. 11, 1051 Budapest, Hungary Phone: +40744251228 Stupariu_Ioana@phd.ceu.edu | www.ceu.edu<http://www.ceu.edu> [Risultati immagini per ceu logo][https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1BagXXaNk9Ct-0E173kqDcdjXA1Ul7dPB&export=down...] ________________________________ From: Npoc-discuss <npoc-discuss-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Carlos Raul Gutierrez <carlosraul@gutierrez.se> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 2:00 PM To: npoc-discuss@icann.org <npoc-discuss@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Npoc-discuss] One last review before sending our charter to ICANN staff Hello Raoul! Thanks for your efforts. I understand the importance of a transparent registration process. And of course, pricing is a key element not only for the initial registration but also for maintaining the domain over time. What I don't fully grasp is putting both together with an "and" in the middle. I don't have an alternative suggestion at the time but can think of a better structure of what you have already stated: <<<We want to encompass all operational concerns, including all * technical (Registration, Security, Stability, and Resiliency), *legal (Domain Name Fraud, Intellectual Property Abuse, Privacy), * and economic (initial Pricing and renewal conditions) implications of registering, holding and using TLDs for the stated purposes of non-profits >>> For what it is worth --- Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez carlosraul@gutierrez.se<mailto:carlosraul@gutierrez.se> +506 8837 7176 Aparatado 1571-1000 COSTA RICA El 2019-10-21 08:37, Raoul Plommer escribió: Dear members of NPOC, Our new charter is finally at the stage, where we will send it to staff to do their own review. Here it is: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HRcUOxtoMUzJnfXhXm-wpJd3vDmVRG9uFTRyojOA... If no new comments have arrived to it by Friday (25.10.), we'll send it off to staff before our F2F meeting in Montreal. The only bit that was changed since the last iteration, was the mission. Here's the new version: "1.2 NPOC's mission is to represent Not-for-Profit Organizations by addressing their operational concerns with the generic Top-level Domains (gTLDs). Operational Concerns are defined as issues arising from the use of the gTLDs by the not-for-profit organizations to achieve their own mission. Those can include but are not limited to Domain Name Fraud, Intellectual Property Abuse, Privacy, Security, Stability, and Resiliency, as well as transparent registration process and pricing and continued ownership of domain names." The only change to it from older versions was the highlighted part "process and pricing", as we felt it'd be good to specify what kind of transparency we'd want. Supposedly, without the specification, one could think we'd want the registrants' information to be public. That's not what we want. -Raoul _______________________________________________ Npoc-discuss mailing list Npoc-discuss@icann.org<mailto:Npoc-discuss@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/npoc-discuss _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Thanks Raoul, Endorsed Kind Regards Poncelet On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 14:37, Raoul Plommer <plommer@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear members of NPOC,
Our new charter is finally at the stage, where we will send it to staff to do their own review. Here it is: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HRcUOxtoMUzJnfXhXm-wpJd3vDmVRG9uFTRyojOA...
If no new comments have arrived to it by Friday (25.10.), we'll send it off to staff before our F2F meeting in Montreal.
The only bit that was changed since the last iteration, was the mission. Here's the new version:
"1.2 NPOC’s mission is to represent Not-for-Profit Organizations by addressing their operational concerns with the generic Top-level Domains (gTLDs). Operational Concerns are defined as issues arising from the use of the gTLDs by the not-for-profit organizations to achieve their own mission. Those can include but are not limited to Domain Name Fraud, Intellectual Property Abuse, Privacy, Security, Stability, and Resiliency, as well as transparent registration process and pricing and continued ownership of domain names."
The only change to it from older versions was the highlighted part "process and pricing", as we felt it'd be good to specify what kind of transparency we'd want. Supposedly, without the specification, one could think we'd want the registrants' information to be public. That's not what we want.
-Raoul _______________________________________________ Npoc-discuss mailing list Npoc-discuss@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/npoc-discuss _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-- Poncelet O. Ileleji MBCS Coordinator The Gambia YMCAs Computer Training Centre & Digital Studio MDI Road Kanifing South P. O. Box 421 Banjul The Gambia, West Africa Tel: (220) 4370240 Fax:(220) 4390793 Cell:(220) 9912508 Skype: pons_utd *www.ymca.gm <http://www.ymca.gm>http://jokkolabs.net/en/ <http://jokkolabs.net/en/>* *https://www.netfreedompioneers.org/ <https://www.netfreedompioneers.org/> * *www.waigf.org <http://www.waigf.org>www,insistglobal.com <http://www.itag.gm>www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org>*
Looks good. John More
On Oct 21, 2019, at 10:37 AM, Raoul Plommer <plommer@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear members of NPOC,
Our new charter is finally at the stage, where we will send it to staff to do their own review. Here it is: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HRcUOxtoMUzJnfXhXm-wpJd3vDmVRG9uFTRyojOA... <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HRcUOxtoMUzJnfXhXm-wpJd3vDmVRG9uFTRyojOA...>
If no new comments have arrived to it by Friday (25.10.), we'll send it off to staff before our F2F meeting in Montreal.
The only bit that was changed since the last iteration, was the mission. Here's the new version:
"1.2 NPOC’s mission is to represent Not-for-Profit Organizations by addressing their operational concerns with the generic Top-level Domains (gTLDs). Operational Concerns are defined as issues arising from the use of the gTLDs by the not-for-profit organizations to achieve their own mission. Those can include but are not limited to Domain Name Fraud, Intellectual Property Abuse, Privacy, Security, Stability, and Resiliency, as well as transparent registration process and pricing and continued ownership of domain names."
The only change to it from older versions was the highlighted part "process and pricing", as we felt it'd be good to specify what kind of transparency we'd want. Supposedly, without the specification, one could think we'd want the registrants' information to be public. That's not what we want.
-Raoul _______________________________________________ Npoc-discuss mailing list Npoc-discuss@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/npoc-discuss _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Looks fine to me too. Please, move forward. Warm regards L'événementiel de Le 22 oct. 2019 18:37, "John More via Npoc-discuss" <npoc-discuss@icann.org> a écrit : Looks good. John More On Oct 21, 2019, at 10:37 AM, Raoul Plommer <plommer@gmail.com> wrote: Dear members of NPOC, Our new charter is finally at the stage, where we will send it to staff to do their own review. Here it is: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HRcUOxtoMUzJnfXhXm-wpJd3vDmVRG9uFTRyojOA... If no new comments have arrived to it by Friday (25.10.), we'll send it off to staff before our F2F meeting in Montreal. The only bit that was changed since the last iteration, was the mission. Here's the new version: "1.2 NPOC’s mission is to represent Not-for-Profit Organizations by addressing their operational concerns with the generic Top-level Domains (gTLDs). Operational Concerns are defined as issues arising from the use of the gTLDs by the not-for-profit organizations to achieve their own mission. Those can include but are not limited to Domain Name Fraud, Intellectual Property Abuse, Privacy, Security, Stability, and Resiliency, as well as transparent registration process and pricing and continued ownership of domain names." The only change to it from older versions was the highlighted part "process and pricing", as we felt it'd be good to specify what kind of transparency we'd want. Supposedly, without the specification, one could think we'd want the registrants' information to be public. That's not what we want. -Raoul _______________________________________________ Npoc-discuss mailing list Npoc-discuss@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/npoc-discuss _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. _______________________________________________ Npoc-discuss mailing list Npoc-discuss@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/npoc-discuss _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
It is fine. J. Restrepo From: Npoc-discuss [mailto:npoc-discuss-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Raoul Plommer Sent: lundi 21 octobre 2019 16:37 To: NPOC Discuss Subject: [Npoc-discuss] One last review before sending our charter to ICANN staff Dear members of NPOC, Our new charter is finally at the stage, where we will send it to staff to do their own review. Here it is: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HRcUOxtoMUzJnfXhXm-wpJd3vDmVRG9uFTRyojOA... If no new comments have arrived to it by Friday (25.10.), we'll send it off to staff before our F2F meeting in Montreal. The only bit that was changed since the last iteration, was the mission. Here's the new version: "1.2 NPOC’s mission is to represent Not-for-Profit Organizations by addressing their operational concerns with the generic Top-level Domains (gTLDs). Operational Concerns are defined as issues arising from the use of the gTLDs by the not-for-profit organizations to achieve their own mission. Those can include but are not limited to Domain Name Fraud, Intellectual Property Abuse, Privacy, Security, Stability, and Resiliency, as well as transparent registration process and pricing and continued ownership of domain names." The only change to it from older versions was the highlighted part "process and pricing", as we felt it'd be good to specify what kind of transparency we'd want. Supposedly, without the specification, one could think we'd want the registrants' information to be public. That's not what we want. -Raoul
participants (8)
-
Carlos Raul Gutierrez -
Ioana Stupariu -
John More -
Jorge Restrepo -
Olivier Kouami -
Poncelet Ileleji -
Raoul Plommer -
Sam Lanfranco