Hi, Comments requested. I am interested, as both an ALAC rep to the CCG and as one of the co-chairs, in the degree to which the prospective recommendations in this draft match what you all believe they should be. After 86 there will be formal review, but this is a good chance to flag issues. thanks avri -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [Reviewsccg] Initial draft report Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 04:56:12 +0000 From: Alice Jansen via Reviewsccg <reviewsccg@icann.org> Reply-To: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org> To: Alice Jansen via Reviewsccg <reviewsccg@icann.org> Dear Reviews CCG, Co-Chairs ask that you please read the Initial Draft Report <https://docs.google.com/document/d/14lPAS-Rpp8zW4jgTs2ooGZR9r3nTxZz6eOPZDTsj...> document that is being prepared for ICANN86 and flag any concerns you may have by 2 June. We will briefly walk through this document later today during our plenary call and will dedicate the next plenary call to addressing any concerns raised. The plan is to finalize and release the document shortly thereafter, in time for Sevilla, together with a blog <https://docs.google.com/document/d/16QQETBUisUVi4fociQ9P_FCz8yJTr-Bk/edit> that offers some context. This report is an intermediary step towards the Draft Report that will be published after ICANN86. Thank you Best regards Alice