On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 7:53 AM Chris Disspain via Phr <phr@icann.org> wrote:
Hello All,
- How should
bestgood practices be defined? (Pg 22 & 72 of ATRT3 Final Report).
-ed: Good practices should begin with a clear definition of the scope and objectives, ensuring the review remains focused and targeted on the relevant areas. Stakeholder engagement is also crucial, as it ensures that diverse perspectives are considered, which improves the quality of the review and fosters transparency. The use of data and evidence further strengthens the process, providing a solid foundation for conclusions and helping identify areas for improvement. Additionally, transparency and accountability should guide the review, maintaining public trust and ensuring that actions are taken when necessary. Finally, effective follow-up mechanisms should be established to track progress and ensure that the recommendations are implemented and improvements continue.
- Should
bestgood practices be understood/agreed upon by the SO/AC/NomCom before each group undertakes its work?
-ed: I don't think so. The HR is holistic, meaning it will review all the SO/AC/NomCom, so these groups do not need to agree on a set of good practices for the HR to follow, but the PHR team does. In any case, the PHR draft report will be made public, and at that time, everyone will have the opportunity to comment on it. This will provide an opportunity to reach an agreement on these practices from the HR perspective.
The SO/AC/NomCom will follow whatever good practices, if any, are ultimately agreed upon in the CIP framework. Since the PHR is not involved in the development of that framework, any discussions suggesting what the SO/AC/NomCom should or should not do from the perspective of our work should be considered out of scope for us.
I have a question…The ATRT 3 Final Report says - 'Review continuous improvement efforts of SO/AC/NC based on good practices’. Does this mean that the review should consider whether the CIP efforts of an SO are based on good practices or does it mean that the review should be based on good practices?
-ed: Given that this recommendation comes from the ATRT 3, it should be understood that the Holistic Review (HR) is expected to evaluate the CIP efforts by applying good practices in the review process.
_______________________________________________Obviously good practice for doing a review is a different set of practices from those for continuous improvement efforts.Thoughts?On 29 Jan 2025, at 17:26, Jessica Puccio via Phr <phr@icann.org> wrote:_______________________________________________Hello Team -We are currently working to coordinate a meeting with the Board’s Organizational Effectiveness Committee (OEC) in response to León’s request. Since it is unlikely that the meeting with the OEC will occur prior to the team’s next scheduled plenary call, the Monday, 03 February PHR call will be canceled.In lieu of the plenary call, we would like to encourage continued discussion on the survey from the last call, via the mailing list, on the issue of defining “good practices”. There was agreement in the survey that “[r]eviewing continuous improvement efforts of SO/AC/NC based on good practices”, is within our remit. With this in mind, we would like to ask:
- How should best practices be defined? (Pg 22 & 72 of ATRT3 Final Report).
- Should best practices be understood/agreed upon by the SO/AC/NomCom before each group undertakes its work?
We look forward to hearing your thoughts and perspective on this issue.
Best Regards
Co-Chairs Chris & Sophie--Jessica PuccioSr Coordinator, Review Support and Accountability ProjectsInternet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Phr mailing list -- phr@icann.org
To unsubscribe send an email to phr-leave@icann.org
Phr mailing list -- phr@icann.org
To unsubscribe send an email to phr-leave@icann.org