How should ~~best~~ good practices be defined? (Pg 22 & 72 of ATRT3 Final Report).
Should ~~best~~ good practices be understood/agreed upon by the SO/AC/NomCom before each group undertakes its work?

I have a question…

The ATRT 3 Final Report says - 'Review continuous improvement efforts of SO/AC/NC based on good practices’. Does this mean that the review should consider whether the CIP efforts of an SO are based on good practices or does it mean that the review should be based on good practices?

Obviously good practice for doing a review is a different set of practices from those for continuous improvement efforts.

Thoughts?

Cheers,

Chris Disspain
chris@disspain.uk

+44 7880 642456

On 29 Jan 2025, at 17:26, Jessica Puccio via Phr <phr@icann.org> wrote:

Hello Team -

We are currently working to coordinate a meeting with the Board’s Organizational Effectiveness Committee (OEC) in response to León’s request. Since it is unlikely that the meeting with the OEC will occur prior to the team’s next scheduled plenary call, the Monday, 03 February PHR call will be canceled.

In lieu of the plenary call, we would like to encourage continued discussion on the survey from the last call, via the mailing list, on the issue of defining “good practices”. There was agreement in the survey that “[r]eviewing continuous improvement efforts of SO/AC/NC based on good practices”, is within our remit. With this in mind, we would like to ask:

How should best practices be defined? (Pg 22 & 72 of ATRT3 Final Report).
Should best practices be understood/agreed upon by the SO/AC/NomCom before each group undertakes its work?

We look forward to hearing your thoughts and perspective on this issue.

Best Regards
Co-Chairs Chris & Sophie

--
Jessica Puccio
Sr Coordinator, Review Support and Accountability Projects
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

_______________________________________________
Phr mailing list -- phr@icann.org
To unsubscribe send an email to phr-leave@icann.org