Re: [Public-Experts] question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Jeanette, Janis and Larry, I am copying you individually and the public-experts group email list for purposes of transparency. While this discussion about extending the deadline may seem like a simple administrative matter, our agreement is to conduct our activities on a "default open" basis unless there is a clear reason to conduct activities in closed session. I realized the prior emails had not been copied to the public-experts group list and wanted to address that matter. Below is a draft extension of the Call for Candidates from Grace for our consideration. I am fine with the extension and I have a question about the extension. As drafted, it would close the call for candidates on the same day the public comment period on the accountability process would close. Is anything substantive "lost" by closing the call on the same day the comments close? If so, closing the call beyond the close of the comment period, even if for a matter of a few days to fully consider any comments received late in the process, could make sense. What are your views? Thank you. Brian From: Grace Abuhamad [mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 9:49 AM To: Theresa Swinehart Cc: Brian Cute Subject: Re: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates How's this? EXTENDED - Call for Candidates: Seeking Advisors to the ICANN Accountability & Governance Coordination Group In light of the 6 - 27 September <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en> public comment period<https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en> on the Enhancing ICANN Accountability and Governance Process, the Public Experts Group has decided to extend its Call for Candidates<https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>. The original due date of 10 September is now 27 September at 23:59 UTC, so as to align with the close of the public comment period. With the exception of date, all other elements of the Call for Candidates<https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en> remain the same. For more information on how to submit a nomination, please see here<https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>. I can submit this as a new announcement so that the information is sent out through our announcement system (social media, email, etc), but I also suggest updating the actual Call with the new date and a message about the Extension at the top. From: Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart@icann.org<mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>> Date: Monday, September 8, 2014 8:20 AM To: Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org<mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org>> Cc: Brian Cute <bcute@pir.org<mailto:bcute@pir.org>> Subject: FW: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates Grace, can you prepare what would be an announcement of the extension for sign-off by Larry, Janis, Jeanette and Brian. Thanks Theresa From: Lawrence Strickling <lstrickling@ntia.doc.gov<mailto:lstrickling@ntia.doc.gov>> Date: Saturday, September 6, 2014 10:45 AM To: Janis Karklins <karklinsj@gmail.com<mailto:karklinsj@gmail.com>>, Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette@wzb.eu<mailto:jeanette@wzb.eu>> Cc: Brian Cute <bcute@pir.org<mailto:bcute@pir.org>>, Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart@icann.org<mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>>, Fiona Alexander <FAlexander@ntia.doc.gov<mailto:FAlexander@ntia.doc.gov>>, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org<mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org>>, Fadi Chehade <fadi.chehade@icann.org<mailto:fadi.chehade@icann.org>> Subject: RE: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates Make it unanimous. Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Janis Karklins Date:09/06/2014 4:45 PM (GMT+02:00) To: Jeanette Hofmann Cc: Brian Cute , Theresa Swinehart , Larry Strickling , Fiona Alexander , Grace Abuhamad , Fadi Chehade Subject: Re: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates Me too. JK On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette@wzb.eu<mailto:jeanette@wzb.eu>> wrote: I agree with Brian. Jeanette On 6 September 2014 13:16:09 CEST, Brian Cute <bcute@pir.org<mailto:bcute@pir.org>> wrote:
I think that is the logical thing to do given the comment period. I don't know that the substance of the call itself will change in a material way based on comments received but in light of the ICANN community's request for the comment period, that would be prudent.
Brian
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 6, 2014, at 5:25 AM, "Theresa Swinehart" <theresa.swinehart@icann.org<mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org><mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org<mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>>> wrote:
All,
In light of the posting the accountability process for a last call/round of comments yesterday (6 September) for a 21 day public comment period, i've been asked whether there would be an extension on the deadline for the call for candidates to the date the comment period closes. That is, extend it from 10 September to 27 September.
I wanted to raise this for your your decision.
The original call for candidates can be found at: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en
Please let us know if you would like to extend the deadline. If so, Grace can assist in preparing a revised announcement extending the deadline for your review, and posting upon your approval.
Thanks
Theresa -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Brian, The alignment of dates of two parallel processes seems natural in absence of any other strict deadlines. Community attention will be focuses of comments to accountability framework and related call for advisors. But as our initial idea of bringing selected advisors to ICANN 51 meeting is not feasible (as a result of the extension of the deadline) nothing prevents us from further extension of the deadline of the call if we won't have enough proposals. Best regards JK ________________________________ From: Brian Cute [bcute@pir.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2014 4:35 AM To: Grace Abuhamad; Theresa Swinehart; Janis Karklins; Lawrence Strickling; Jeanette Hofmann; public-experts@icann.org Subject: RE: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates Jeanette, Janis and Larry, I am copying you individually and the public-experts group email list for purposes of transparency. While this discussion about extending the deadline may seem like a simple administrative matter, our agreement is to conduct our activities on a “default open” basis unless there is a clear reason to conduct activities in closed session. I realized the prior emails had not been copied to the public-experts group list and wanted to address that matter. Below is a draft extension of the Call for Candidates from Grace for our consideration. I am fine with the extension and I have a question about the extension. As drafted, it would close the call for candidates on the same day the public comment period on the accountability process would close. Is anything substantive “lost” by closing the call on the same day the comments close? If so, closing the call beyond the close of the comment period, even if for a matter of a few days to fully consider any comments received late in the process, could make sense. What are your views? Thank you. Brian From: Grace Abuhamad [mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 9:49 AM To: Theresa Swinehart Cc: Brian Cute Subject: Re: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates How's this? EXTENDED — Call for Candidates: Seeking Advisors to the ICANN Accountability & Governance Coordination Group In light of the 6 – 27 September <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en> public comment period<https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en> on the Enhancing ICANN Accountability and Governance Process, the Public Experts Group has decided to extend its Call for Candidates<https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>. The original due date of 10 September is now 27 September at 23:59 UTC, so as to align with the close of the public comment period. With the exception of date, all other elements of the Call for Candidates<https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en> remain the same. For more information on how to submit a nomination, please see here<https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>. I can submit this as a new announcement so that the information is sent out through our announcement system (social media, email, etc), but I also suggest updating the actual Call with the new date and a message about the Extension at the top. From: Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart@icann.org<mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>> Date: Monday, September 8, 2014 8:20 AM To: Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org<mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org>> Cc: Brian Cute <bcute@pir.org<mailto:bcute@pir.org>> Subject: FW: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates Grace, can you prepare what would be an announcement of the extension for sign-off by Larry, Janis, Jeanette and Brian. Thanks Theresa From: Lawrence Strickling <lstrickling@ntia.doc.gov<mailto:lstrickling@ntia.doc.gov>> Date: Saturday, September 6, 2014 10:45 AM To: Janis Karklins <karklinsj@gmail.com<mailto:karklinsj@gmail.com>>, Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette@wzb.eu<mailto:jeanette@wzb.eu>> Cc: Brian Cute <bcute@pir.org<mailto:bcute@pir.org>>, Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart@icann.org<mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>>, Fiona Alexander <FAlexander@ntia.doc.gov<mailto:FAlexander@ntia.doc.gov>>, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org<mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org>>, Fadi Chehade <fadi.chehade@icann.org<mailto:fadi.chehade@icann.org>> Subject: RE: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates Make it unanimous. Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Janis Karklins Date:09/06/2014 4:45 PM (GMT+02:00) To: Jeanette Hofmann Cc: Brian Cute , Theresa Swinehart , Larry Strickling , Fiona Alexander , Grace Abuhamad , Fadi Chehade Subject: Re: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates Me too. JK On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette@wzb.eu<mailto:jeanette@wzb.eu>> wrote: I agree with Brian. Jeanette On 6 September 2014 13:16:09 CEST, Brian Cute <bcute@pir.org<mailto:bcute@pir.org>> wrote:
I think that is the logical thing to do given the comment period. I don't know that the substance of the call itself will change in a material way based on comments received but in light of the ICANN community's request for the comment period, that would be prudent.
Brian
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 6, 2014, at 5:25 AM, "Theresa Swinehart" <theresa.swinehart@icann.org<mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org><mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org<mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>>> wrote:
All,
In light of the posting the accountability process for a last call/round of comments yesterday (6 September) for a 21 day public comment period, i've been asked whether there would be an extension on the deadline for the call for candidates to the date the comment period closes. That is, extend it from 10 September to 27 September.
I wanted to raise this for your your decision.
The original call for candidates can be found at: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en
Please let us know if you would like to extend the deadline. If so, Grace can assist in preparing a revised announcement extending the deadline for your review, and posting upon your approval.
Thanks
Theresa -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Hi all, I agree with extending the deadline a couple of days beyond the comment period. I wouldn't be surprised if there were also comments about the Public Expert Group. Jeanette Am 09.09.14 05:24, schrieb Janis Karklins:
Brian,
The alignment of dates of two parallel processes seems natural in absence of any other strict deadlines. Community attention will be focuses of comments to accountability framework and related call for advisors.
But as our initial idea of bringing selected advisors to ICANN 51 meeting is not feasible (as a result of the extension of the deadline) nothing prevents us from further extension of the deadline of the call if we won't have enough proposals.
Best regards JK
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Brian Cute [bcute@pir.org] *Sent:* Tuesday, September 9, 2014 4:35 AM *To:* Grace Abuhamad; Theresa Swinehart; Janis Karklins; Lawrence Strickling; Jeanette Hofmann; public-experts@icann.org *Subject:* RE: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Jeanette, Janis and Larry,
I am copying you individually and the public-experts group email list for purposes of transparency. While this discussion about extending the deadline may seem like a simple administrative matter, our agreement is to conduct our activities on a “default open” basis unless there is a clear reason to conduct activities in closed session. I realized the prior emails had not been copied to the public-experts group list and wanted to address that matter.
Below is a draft extension of the Call for Candidates from Grace for our consideration. I am fine with the extension and I have a question about the extension. As drafted, it would close the call for candidates on the same day the public comment period on the accountability process would close. Is anything substantive “lost” by closing the call on the same day the comments close? If so, closing the call beyond the close of the comment period, even if for a matter of a few days to fully consider any comments received late in the process, could make sense. What are your views? Thank you.
Brian
*From:*Grace Abuhamad [mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org] *Sent:* Monday, September 08, 2014 9:49 AM *To:* Theresa Swinehart *Cc:* Brian Cute *Subject:* Re: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
How's this?
*EXTENDED — Call for Candidates: Seeking Advisors to the ICANN Accountability & Governance Coordination Group*
In light of the 6 – 27 September <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en>public comment period <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en> on the Enhancing ICANN Accountability and Governance Process, the Public Experts Group has decided to extend its Call for Candidates <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>. The original due date of 10 September is now 27 September at 23:59 UTC, so as to align with the close of the public comment period. With the exception of date, all other elements of the Call for Candidates <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en> remain the same. For more information on how to submit a nomination, please see here <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>.
I can submit this as a new announcement so that the information is sent out through our announcement system (social media, email, etc), but I also suggest updating the actual Call with the new date and a message about the Extension at the top.
*From: *Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart@icann.org <mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>> *Date: *Monday, September 8, 2014 8:20 AM *To: *Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org <mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org>> *Cc: *Brian Cute <bcute@pir.org <mailto:bcute@pir.org>> *Subject: *FW: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Grace, can you prepare what would be an announcement of the extension for sign-off by Larry, Janis, Jeanette and Brian.
Thanks
Theresa
*From: *Lawrence Strickling <lstrickling@ntia.doc.gov <mailto:lstrickling@ntia.doc.gov>> *Date: *Saturday, September 6, 2014 10:45 AM *To: *Janis Karklins <karklinsj@gmail.com <mailto:karklinsj@gmail.com>>, Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette@wzb.eu <mailto:jeanette@wzb.eu>> *Cc: *Brian Cute <bcute@pir.org <mailto:bcute@pir.org>>, Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart@icann.org <mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>>, Fiona Alexander <FAlexander@ntia.doc.gov <mailto:FAlexander@ntia.doc.gov>>, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org <mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org>>, Fadi Chehade <fadi.chehade@icann.org <mailto:fadi.chehade@icann.org>> *Subject: *RE: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Make it unanimous.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: Janis Karklins
Date:09/06/2014 4:45 PM (GMT+02:00)
To: Jeanette Hofmann
Cc: Brian Cute , Theresa Swinehart , Larry Strickling , Fiona Alexander , Grace Abuhamad , Fadi Chehade
Subject: Re: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Me too.
JK
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette@wzb.eu <mailto:jeanette@wzb.eu>> wrote:
I agree with Brian. Jeanette
On 6 September 2014 13:16:09 CEST, Brian Cute <bcute@pir.org <mailto:bcute@pir.org>> wrote: >I think that is the logical thing to do given the comment period. I >don't know that the substance of the call itself will change in a >material way based on comments received but in light of the ICANN >community's request for the comment period, that would be prudent. > >Brian > >Sent from my iPhone > >On Sep 6, 2014, at 5:25 AM, "Theresa Swinehart" ><theresa.swinehart@icann.org <mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org><mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org <mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>>>
>wrote: > >All, > >In light of the posting the accountability process for a last >call/round of comments yesterday (6 September) for a 21 day public >comment period, i've been asked whether there would be an extension on >the deadline for the call for candidates to the date the comment period >closes. That is, extend it from 10 September to 27 September. > >I wanted to raise this for your your decision. > >The original call for candidates can be found at: >https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en > >Please let us know if you would like to extend the deadline. If so, >Grace can assist in preparing a revised announcement extending the >deadline for your review, and posting upon your approval. > >Thanks > >Theresa
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Hi all, Since the original deadline is tomorrow, I suggest we finalize the text-announcement for the extension today. Does 30 September work? I've modified the draft text below (all links will be hyperlinked). *EXTENDED Call for Candidates: Seeking Advisors to the ICANN Accountability & Governance Coordination Group* In light of the 6 27 September <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en>public comment period <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en> on the Enhancing ICANN Accountability and Governance Process, the Public Experts Group has decided to extend its Call for Candidates <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>. The original due date of 10 September is now 30 September at 23:59 UTC, so as to align with the close of the public comment period. With the exception of date, all other elements of the Call for Candidates <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en> remain the same. For more information on how to submit a nomination, please see here <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>. On 9/9/14 12:41 AM, "Jeanette Hofmann" <jeanette@wzb.eu> wrote:
Hi all, I agree with extending the deadline a couple of days beyond the comment period. I wouldn't be surprised if there were also comments about the Public Expert Group. Jeanette
Am 09.09.14 05:24, schrieb Janis Karklins:
Brian,
The alignment of dates of two parallel processes seems natural in absence of any other strict deadlines. Community attention will be focuses of comments to accountability framework and related call for advisors.
But as our initial idea of bringing selected advisors to ICANN 51 meeting is not feasible (as a result of the extension of the deadline) nothing prevents us from further extension of the deadline of the call if we won't have enough proposals.
Best regards JK
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Brian Cute [bcute@pir.org] *Sent:* Tuesday, September 9, 2014 4:35 AM *To:* Grace Abuhamad; Theresa Swinehart; Janis Karklins; Lawrence Strickling; Jeanette Hofmann; public-experts@icann.org *Subject:* RE: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Jeanette, Janis and Larry,
I am copying you individually and the public-experts group email list for purposes of transparency. While this discussion about extending the deadline may seem like a simple administrative matter, our agreement is to conduct our activities on a ³default open² basis unless there is a clear reason to conduct activities in closed session. I realized the prior emails had not been copied to the public-experts group list and wanted to address that matter.
Below is a draft extension of the Call for Candidates from Grace for our consideration. I am fine with the extension and I have a question about the extension. As drafted, it would close the call for candidates on the same day the public comment period on the accountability process would close. Is anything substantive ³lost² by closing the call on the same day the comments close? If so, closing the call beyond the close of the comment period, even if for a matter of a few days to fully consider any comments received late in the process, could make sense. What are your views? Thank you.
Brian
*From:*Grace Abuhamad [mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org] *Sent:* Monday, September 08, 2014 9:49 AM *To:* Theresa Swinehart *Cc:* Brian Cute *Subject:* Re: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
How's this?
*EXTENDED Call for Candidates: Seeking Advisors to the ICANN Accountability & Governance Coordination Group*
In light of the 6 27 September <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en>public comment period <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en> on the Enhancing ICANN Accountability and Governance Process, the Public Experts Group has decided to extend its Call for Candidates <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>. The original due date of 10 September is now 27 September at 23:59 UTC, so as to align with the close of the public comment period. With the exception of date, all other elements of the Call for Candidates <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en> remain the same. For more information on how to submit a nomination, please see here <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>.
I can submit this as a new announcement so that the information is sent out through our announcement system (social media, email, etc), but I also suggest updating the actual Call with the new date and a message about the Extension at the top.
*From: *Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart@icann.org <mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>> *Date: *Monday, September 8, 2014 8:20 AM *To: *Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org <mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org>> *Cc: *Brian Cute <bcute@pir.org <mailto:bcute@pir.org>> *Subject: *FW: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Grace, can you prepare what would be an announcement of the extension for sign-off by Larry, Janis, Jeanette and Brian.
Thanks
Theresa
*From: *Lawrence Strickling <lstrickling@ntia.doc.gov <mailto:lstrickling@ntia.doc.gov>> *Date: *Saturday, September 6, 2014 10:45 AM *To: *Janis Karklins <karklinsj@gmail.com <mailto:karklinsj@gmail.com>>, Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette@wzb.eu <mailto:jeanette@wzb.eu>> *Cc: *Brian Cute <bcute@pir.org <mailto:bcute@pir.org>>, Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart@icann.org <mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>>, Fiona Alexander <FAlexander@ntia.doc.gov <mailto:FAlexander@ntia.doc.gov>>, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org <mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org>>, Fadi Chehade <fadi.chehade@icann.org <mailto:fadi.chehade@icann.org>> *Subject: *RE: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Make it unanimous.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: Janis Karklins
Date:09/06/2014 4:45 PM (GMT+02:00)
To: Jeanette Hofmann
Cc: Brian Cute , Theresa Swinehart , Larry Strickling , Fiona Alexander , Grace Abuhamad , Fadi Chehade
Subject: Re: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Me too.
JK
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette@wzb.eu <mailto:jeanette@wzb.eu>> wrote:
I agree with Brian. Jeanette
On 6 September 2014 13:16:09 CEST, Brian Cute <bcute@pir.org <mailto:bcute@pir.org>> wrote: >I think that is the logical thing to do given the comment period. I >don't know that the substance of the call itself will change in a >material way based on comments received but in light of the ICANN >community's request for the comment period, that would be prudent. > >Brian > >Sent from my iPhone > >On Sep 6, 2014, at 5:25 AM, "Theresa Swinehart" ><theresa.swinehart@icann.org
<mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org><mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org <mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>>>
>wrote: > >All, > >In light of the posting the accountability process for a last >call/round of comments yesterday (6 September) for a 21 day public >comment period, i've been asked whether there would be an extension on >the deadline for the call for candidates to the date the comment period >closes. That is, extend it from 10 September to 27 September. > >I wanted to raise this for your your decision. > >The original call for candidates can be found at: >https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en > >Please let us know if you would like to extend the deadline. If so, >Grace can assist in preparing a revised announcement extending the >deadline for your review, and posting upon your approval. > >Thanks > >Theresa
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Okay ________________________________________ From: Grace Abuhamad [grace.abuhamad@icann.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 9:40 AM To: Jeanette Hofmann; Janis Karklins; Brian Cute; Theresa Swinehart; Larry Strickling; public-experts@icann.org Subject: Re: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates Hi all, Since the original deadline is tomorrow, I suggest we finalize the text-announcement for the extension today. Does 30 September work? I've modified the draft text below (all links will be hyperlinked). *EXTENDED ‹ Call for Candidates: Seeking Advisors to the ICANN Accountability & Governance Coordination Group* In light of the 6 27 September <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en>public comment period <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en> on the Enhancing ICANN Accountability and Governance Process, the Public Experts Group has decided to extend its Call for Candidates <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>. The original due date of 10 September is now 30 September at 23:59 UTC, so as to align with the close of the public comment period. With the exception of date, all other elements of the Call for Candidates <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en> remain the same. For more information on how to submit a nomination, please see here <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>. On 9/9/14 12:41 AM, "Jeanette Hofmann" <jeanette@wzb.eu> wrote:
Hi all, I agree with extending the deadline a couple of days beyond the comment period. I wouldn't be surprised if there were also comments about the Public Expert Group. Jeanette
Am 09.09.14 05:24, schrieb Janis Karklins:
Brian,
The alignment of dates of two parallel processes seems natural in absence of any other strict deadlines. Community attention will be focuses of comments to accountability framework and related call for advisors.
But as our initial idea of bringing selected advisors to ICANN 51 meeting is not feasible (as a result of the extension of the deadline) nothing prevents us from further extension of the deadline of the call if we won't have enough proposals.
Best regards JK
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Brian Cute [bcute@pir.org] *Sent:* Tuesday, September 9, 2014 4:35 AM *To:* Grace Abuhamad; Theresa Swinehart; Janis Karklins; Lawrence Strickling; Jeanette Hofmann; public-experts@icann.org *Subject:* RE: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Jeanette, Janis and Larry,
I am copying you individually and the public-experts group email list for purposes of transparency. While this discussion about extending the deadline may seem like a simple administrative matter, our agreement is to conduct our activities on a ³default open² basis unless there is a clear reason to conduct activities in closed session. I realized the prior emails had not been copied to the public-experts group list and wanted to address that matter.
Below is a draft extension of the Call for Candidates from Grace for our consideration. I am fine with the extension and I have a question about the extension. As drafted, it would close the call for candidates on the same day the public comment period on the accountability process would close. Is anything substantive ³lost² by closing the call on the same day the comments close? If so, closing the call beyond the close of the comment period, even if for a matter of a few days to fully consider any comments received late in the process, could make sense. What are your views? Thank you.
Brian
*From:*Grace Abuhamad [mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org] *Sent:* Monday, September 08, 2014 9:49 AM *To:* Theresa Swinehart *Cc:* Brian Cute *Subject:* Re: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
How's this?
*EXTENDED ‹ Call for Candidates: Seeking Advisors to the ICANN Accountability & Governance Coordination Group*
In light of the 6 27 September <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en>public comment period <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en> on the Enhancing ICANN Accountability and Governance Process, the Public Experts Group has decided to extend its Call for Candidates <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>. The original due date of 10 September is now 27 September at 23:59 UTC, so as to align with the close of the public comment period. With the exception of date, all other elements of the Call for Candidates <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en> remain the same. For more information on how to submit a nomination, please see here <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>.
I can submit this as a new announcement so that the information is sent out through our announcement system (social media, email, etc), but I also suggest updating the actual Call with the new date and a message about the Extension at the top.
*From: *Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart@icann.org <mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>> *Date: *Monday, September 8, 2014 8:20 AM *To: *Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org <mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org>> *Cc: *Brian Cute <bcute@pir.org <mailto:bcute@pir.org>> *Subject: *FW: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Grace, can you prepare what would be an announcement of the extension for sign-off by Larry, Janis, Jeanette and Brian.
Thanks
Theresa
*From: *Lawrence Strickling <lstrickling@ntia.doc.gov <mailto:lstrickling@ntia.doc.gov>> *Date: *Saturday, September 6, 2014 10:45 AM *To: *Janis Karklins <karklinsj@gmail.com <mailto:karklinsj@gmail.com>>, Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette@wzb.eu <mailto:jeanette@wzb.eu>> *Cc: *Brian Cute <bcute@pir.org <mailto:bcute@pir.org>>, Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart@icann.org <mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>>, Fiona Alexander <FAlexander@ntia.doc.gov <mailto:FAlexander@ntia.doc.gov>>, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org <mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org>>, Fadi Chehade <fadi.chehade@icann.org <mailto:fadi.chehade@icann.org>> *Subject: *RE: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Make it unanimous.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: Janis Karklins
Date:09/06/2014 4:45 PM (GMT+02:00)
To: Jeanette Hofmann
Cc: Brian Cute , Theresa Swinehart , Larry Strickling , Fiona Alexander , Grace Abuhamad , Fadi Chehade
Subject: Re: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Me too.
JK
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette@wzb.eu <mailto:jeanette@wzb.eu>> wrote:
I agree with Brian. Jeanette
On 6 September 2014 13:16:09 CEST, Brian Cute <bcute@pir.org <mailto:bcute@pir.org>> wrote: >I think that is the logical thing to do given the comment period. I >don't know that the substance of the call itself will change in a >material way based on comments received but in light of the ICANN >community's request for the comment period, that would be prudent. > >Brian > >Sent from my iPhone > >On Sep 6, 2014, at 5:25 AM, "Theresa Swinehart" ><theresa.swinehart@icann.org
<mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org><mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org <mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>>>
>wrote: > >All, > >In light of the posting the accountability process for a last >call/round of comments yesterday (6 September) for a 21 day public >comment period, i've been asked whether there would be an extension on >the deadline for the call for candidates to the date the comment period >closes. That is, extend it from 10 September to 27 September. > >I wanted to raise this for your your decision. > >The original call for candidates can be found at: >https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en > >Please let us know if you would like to extend the deadline. If so, >Grace can assist in preparing a revised announcement extending the >deadline for your review, and posting upon your approval. > >Thanks > >Theresa
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Good by me. -----Original Message----- From: Larry Strickling [mailto:LStrickling@ntia.doc.gov] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 12:12 PM To: Grace Abuhamad; Jeanette Hofmann; Janis Karklins; Brian Cute; Theresa Swinehart; public-experts@icann.org Subject: RE: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates Okay ________________________________________ From: Grace Abuhamad [grace.abuhamad@icann.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 9:40 AM To: Jeanette Hofmann; Janis Karklins; Brian Cute; Theresa Swinehart; Larry Strickling; public-experts@icann.org Subject: Re: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates Hi all, Since the original deadline is tomorrow, I suggest we finalize the text-announcement for the extension today. Does 30 September work? I've modified the draft text below (all links will be hyperlinked). *EXTENDED < Call for Candidates: Seeking Advisors to the ICANN Accountability & Governance Coordination Group* In light of the 6 27 September <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en>public comment period <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en> on the Enhancing ICANN Accountability and Governance Process, the Public Experts Group has decided to extend its Call for Candidates <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>. The original due date of 10 September is now 30 September at 23:59 UTC, so as to align with the close of the public comment period. With the exception of date, all other elements of the Call for Candidates <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en> remain the same. For more information on how to submit a nomination, please see here <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>. On 9/9/14 12:41 AM, "Jeanette Hofmann" <jeanette@wzb.eu> wrote:
Hi all, I agree with extending the deadline a couple of days beyond the comment period. I wouldn't be surprised if there were also comments about the Public Expert Group. Jeanette
Am 09.09.14 05:24, schrieb Janis Karklins:
Brian,
The alignment of dates of two parallel processes seems natural in absence of any other strict deadlines. Community attention will be focuses of comments to accountability framework and related call for advisors.
But as our initial idea of bringing selected advisors to ICANN 51 meeting is not feasible (as a result of the extension of the deadline) nothing prevents us from further extension of the deadline of the call if we won't have enough proposals.
Best regards JK
---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- *From:* Brian Cute [bcute@pir.org] *Sent:* Tuesday, September 9, 2014 4:35 AM *To:* Grace Abuhamad; Theresa Swinehart; Janis Karklins; Lawrence Strickling; Jeanette Hofmann; public-experts@icann.org *Subject:* RE: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Jeanette, Janis and Larry,
I am copying you individually and the public-experts group email list for purposes of transparency. While this discussion about extending the deadline may seem like a simple administrative matter, our agreement is to conduct our activities on a ³default open² basis unless there is a clear reason to conduct activities in closed session. I realized the prior emails had not been copied to the public-experts group list and wanted to address that matter.
Below is a draft extension of the Call for Candidates from Grace for our consideration. I am fine with the extension and I have a question about the extension. As drafted, it would close the call for candidates on the same day the public comment period on the accountability process would close. Is anything substantive ³lost² by closing the call on the same day the comments close? If so, closing the call beyond the close of the comment period, even if for a matter of a few days to fully consider any comments received late in the process, could make sense. What are your views? Thank you.
Brian
*From:*Grace Abuhamad [mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org] *Sent:* Monday, September 08, 2014 9:49 AM *To:* Theresa Swinehart *Cc:* Brian Cute *Subject:* Re: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
How's this?
*EXTENDED < Call for Candidates: Seeking Advisors to the ICANN Accountability & Governance Coordination Group*
In light of the 6 27 September <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en>public comment period <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en> on the Enhancing ICANN Accountability and Governance Process, the Public Experts Group has decided to extend its Call for Candidates <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>. The original due date of 10 September is now 27 September at 23:59 UTC, so as to align with the close of the public comment period. With the exception of date, all other elements of the Call for Candidates <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en> remain the same. For more information on how to submit a nomination, please see here <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>.
I can submit this as a new announcement so that the information is sent out through our announcement system (social media, email, etc), but I also suggest updating the actual Call with the new date and a message about the Extension at the top.
*From: *Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart@icann.org <mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>> *Date: *Monday, September 8, 2014 8:20 AM *To: *Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org <mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org>> *Cc: *Brian Cute <bcute@pir.org <mailto:bcute@pir.org>> *Subject: *FW: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Grace, can you prepare what would be an announcement of the extension for sign-off by Larry, Janis, Jeanette and Brian.
Thanks
Theresa
*From: *Lawrence Strickling <lstrickling@ntia.doc.gov <mailto:lstrickling@ntia.doc.gov>> *Date: *Saturday, September 6, 2014 10:45 AM *To: *Janis Karklins <karklinsj@gmail.com <mailto:karklinsj@gmail.com>>, Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette@wzb.eu <mailto:jeanette@wzb.eu>> *Cc: *Brian Cute <bcute@pir.org <mailto:bcute@pir.org>>, Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart@icann.org <mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>>, Fiona Alexander <FAlexander@ntia.doc.gov <mailto:FAlexander@ntia.doc.gov>>, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org <mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org>>, Fadi Chehade <fadi.chehade@icann.org <mailto:fadi.chehade@icann.org>> *Subject: *RE: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Make it unanimous.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: Janis Karklins
Date:09/06/2014 4:45 PM (GMT+02:00)
To: Jeanette Hofmann
Cc: Brian Cute , Theresa Swinehart , Larry Strickling , Fiona Alexander , Grace Abuhamad , Fadi Chehade
Subject: Re: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Me too.
JK
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette@wzb.eu <mailto:jeanette@wzb.eu>> wrote:
I agree with Brian. Jeanette
On 6 September 2014 13:16:09 CEST, Brian Cute <bcute@pir.org <mailto:bcute@pir.org>> wrote: >I think that is the logical thing to do given the comment period. I >don't know that the substance of the call itself will change in a >material way based on comments received but in light of the ICANN >community's request for the comment period, that would be prudent. > >Brian > >Sent from my iPhone > >On Sep 6, 2014, at 5:25 AM, "Theresa Swinehart" ><theresa.swinehart@icann.org
<mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org><mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org <mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>>>
>wrote: > >All, > >In light of the posting the accountability process for a last >call/round of comments yesterday (6 September) for a 21 day public >comment period, i've been asked whether there would be an extension on >the deadline for the call for candidates to the date the comment period >closes. That is, extend it from 10 September to 27 September. > >I wanted to raise this for your your decision. > >The original call for candidates can be found at: >https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en > >Please let us know if you would like to extend the deadline. If so, >Grace can assist in preparing a revised announcement extending the >deadline for your review, and posting upon your approval. > >Thanks > >Theresa
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
+1 jeanette Am 09.09.2014 19:03, schrieb Brian Cute:
Good by me.
-----Original Message----- From: Larry Strickling [mailto:LStrickling@ntia.doc.gov] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 12:12 PM To: Grace Abuhamad; Jeanette Hofmann; Janis Karklins; Brian Cute; Theresa Swinehart; public-experts@icann.org Subject: RE: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Okay ________________________________________ From: Grace Abuhamad [grace.abuhamad@icann.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 9:40 AM To: Jeanette Hofmann; Janis Karklins; Brian Cute; Theresa Swinehart; Larry Strickling; public-experts@icann.org Subject: Re: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Hi all, Since the original deadline is tomorrow, I suggest we finalize the text-announcement for the extension today. Does 30 September work? I've modified the draft text below (all links will be hyperlinked).
*EXTENDED < Call for Candidates: Seeking Advisors to the ICANN Accountability & Governance Coordination Group*
In light of the 6 27 September <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en>public comment period <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en> on the Enhancing ICANN Accountability and Governance Process, the Public Experts Group has decided to extend its Call for Candidates <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>. The original due date of 10 September is now 30 September at 23:59 UTC, so as to align with the close of the public comment period. With the exception of date, all other elements of the Call for Candidates <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en> remain the same. For more information on how to submit a nomination, please see here <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>.
On 9/9/14 12:41 AM, "Jeanette Hofmann" <jeanette@wzb.eu> wrote:
Hi all, I agree with extending the deadline a couple of days beyond the comment period. I wouldn't be surprised if there were also comments about the Public Expert Group. Jeanette
Am 09.09.14 05:24, schrieb Janis Karklins:
Brian,
The alignment of dates of two parallel processes seems natural in absence of any other strict deadlines. Community attention will be focuses of comments to accountability framework and related call for advisors.
But as our initial idea of bringing selected advisors to ICANN 51 meeting is not feasible (as a result of the extension of the deadline) nothing prevents us from further extension of the deadline of the call if we won't have enough proposals.
Best regards JK
---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- *From:* Brian Cute [bcute@pir.org] *Sent:* Tuesday, September 9, 2014 4:35 AM *To:* Grace Abuhamad; Theresa Swinehart; Janis Karklins; Lawrence Strickling; Jeanette Hofmann; public-experts@icann.org *Subject:* RE: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Jeanette, Janis and Larry,
I am copying you individually and the public-experts group email list for purposes of transparency. While this discussion about extending the deadline may seem like a simple administrative matter, our agreement is to conduct our activities on a ³default open² basis unless there is a clear reason to conduct activities in closed session. I realized the prior emails had not been copied to the public-experts group list and wanted to address that matter.
Below is a draft extension of the Call for Candidates from Grace for our consideration. I am fine with the extension and I have a question about the extension. As drafted, it would close the call for candidates on the same day the public comment period on the accountability process would close. Is anything substantive ³lost² by closing the call on the same day the comments close? If so, closing the call beyond the close of the comment period, even if for a matter of a few days to fully consider any comments received late in the process, could make sense. What are your views? Thank you.
Brian
*From:*Grace Abuhamad [mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org] *Sent:* Monday, September 08, 2014 9:49 AM *To:* Theresa Swinehart *Cc:* Brian Cute *Subject:* Re: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
How's this?
*EXTENDED < Call for Candidates: Seeking Advisors to the ICANN Accountability & Governance Coordination Group*
In light of the 6 27 September <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en>public comment period <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en> on the Enhancing ICANN Accountability and Governance Process, the Public Experts Group has decided to extend its Call for Candidates <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>. The original due date of 10 September is now 27 September at 23:59 UTC, so as to align with the close of the public comment period. With the exception of date, all other elements of the Call for Candidates <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en> remain the same. For more information on how to submit a nomination, please see here <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>.
I can submit this as a new announcement so that the information is sent out through our announcement system (social media, email, etc), but I also suggest updating the actual Call with the new date and a message about the Extension at the top.
*From: *Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart@icann.org <mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>> *Date: *Monday, September 8, 2014 8:20 AM *To: *Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org <mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org>> *Cc: *Brian Cute <bcute@pir.org <mailto:bcute@pir.org>> *Subject: *FW: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Grace, can you prepare what would be an announcement of the extension for sign-off by Larry, Janis, Jeanette and Brian.
Thanks
Theresa
*From: *Lawrence Strickling <lstrickling@ntia.doc.gov <mailto:lstrickling@ntia.doc.gov>> *Date: *Saturday, September 6, 2014 10:45 AM *To: *Janis Karklins <karklinsj@gmail.com <mailto:karklinsj@gmail.com>>, Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette@wzb.eu <mailto:jeanette@wzb.eu>> *Cc: *Brian Cute <bcute@pir.org <mailto:bcute@pir.org>>, Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart@icann.org <mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>>, Fiona Alexander <FAlexander@ntia.doc.gov <mailto:FAlexander@ntia.doc.gov>>, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org <mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org>>, Fadi Chehade <fadi.chehade@icann.org <mailto:fadi.chehade@icann.org>> *Subject: *RE: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Make it unanimous.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: Janis Karklins
Date:09/06/2014 4:45 PM (GMT+02:00)
To: Jeanette Hofmann
Cc: Brian Cute , Theresa Swinehart , Larry Strickling , Fiona Alexander , Grace Abuhamad , Fadi Chehade
Subject: Re: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Me too.
JK
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette@wzb.eu <mailto:jeanette@wzb.eu>> wrote:
I agree with Brian. Jeanette
On 6 September 2014 13:16:09 CEST, Brian Cute <bcute@pir.org <mailto:bcute@pir.org>> wrote: >I think that is the logical thing to do given the comment period. I >don't know that the substance of the call itself will change in a >material way based on comments received but in light of the ICANN >community's request for the comment period, that would be prudent. > >Brian > >Sent from my iPhone > >On Sep 6, 2014, at 5:25 AM, "Theresa Swinehart" ><theresa.swinehart@icann.org
<mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org><mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org <mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>>>
>wrote: > >All, > >In light of the posting the accountability process for a last >call/round of comments yesterday (6 September) for a 21 day public >comment period, i've been asked whether there would be an extension on >the deadline for the call for candidates to the date the comment period >closes. That is, extend it from 10 September to 27 September. > >I wanted to raise this for your your decision. > >The original call for candidates can be found at: >https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en > >Please let us know if you would like to extend the deadline. If so, >Grace can assist in preparing a revised announcement extending the >deadline for your review, and posting upon your approval. > >Thanks > >Theresa
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Hello all, The extension has been published: <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-3-2014-09-09-en> Also, I've updated the Call for Candidates to reflect the new deadline date: <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en> I've asked ICANN to share on social media. I will send to the Cross Community mailing list (it's active) and to the Wiki. Please share with your respective communities if you would like. Best, Grace On 9/9/14 1:04 PM, "Jeanette Hofmann" <jeanette@wzb.eu> wrote:
+1 jeanette
Am 09.09.2014 19:03, schrieb Brian Cute:
Good by me.
-----Original Message----- From: Larry Strickling [mailto:LStrickling@ntia.doc.gov] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 12:12 PM To: Grace Abuhamad; Jeanette Hofmann; Janis Karklins; Brian Cute; Theresa Swinehart; public-experts@icann.org Subject: RE: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Okay ________________________________________ From: Grace Abuhamad [grace.abuhamad@icann.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 9:40 AM To: Jeanette Hofmann; Janis Karklins; Brian Cute; Theresa Swinehart; Larry Strickling; public-experts@icann.org Subject: Re: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Hi all, Since the original deadline is tomorrow, I suggest we finalize the text-announcement for the extension today. Does 30 September work? I've modified the draft text below (all links will be hyperlinked).
*EXTENDED < Call for Candidates: Seeking Advisors to the ICANN Accountability & Governance Coordination Group*
In light of the 6 27 September <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en>public comment period <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en> on the Enhancing ICANN Accountability and Governance Process, the Public Experts Group has decided to extend its Call for Candidates <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>. The original due date of 10 September is now 30 September at 23:59 UTC, so as to align with the close of the public comment period. With the exception of date, all other elements of the Call for Candidates <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en> remain the same. For more information on how to submit a nomination, please see here <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>.
On 9/9/14 12:41 AM, "Jeanette Hofmann" <jeanette@wzb.eu> wrote:
Hi all, I agree with extending the deadline a couple of days beyond the comment period. I wouldn't be surprised if there were also comments about the Public Expert Group. Jeanette
Am 09.09.14 05:24, schrieb Janis Karklins:
Brian,
The alignment of dates of two parallel processes seems natural in absence of any other strict deadlines. Community attention will be focuses of comments to accountability framework and related call for advisors.
But as our initial idea of bringing selected advisors to ICANN 51 meeting is not feasible (as a result of the extension of the deadline) nothing prevents us from further extension of the deadline of the call if we won't have enough proposals.
Best regards JK
---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- *From:* Brian Cute [bcute@pir.org] *Sent:* Tuesday, September 9, 2014 4:35 AM *To:* Grace Abuhamad; Theresa Swinehart; Janis Karklins; Lawrence Strickling; Jeanette Hofmann; public-experts@icann.org *Subject:* RE: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Jeanette, Janis and Larry,
I am copying you individually and the public-experts group email list for purposes of transparency. While this discussion about extending the deadline may seem like a simple administrative matter, our agreement is to conduct our activities on a ³default open² basis unless there is a clear reason to conduct activities in closed session. I realized the prior emails had not been copied to the public-experts group list and wanted to address that matter.
Below is a draft extension of the Call for Candidates from Grace for our consideration. I am fine with the extension and I have a question about the extension. As drafted, it would close the call for candidates on the same day the public comment period on the accountability process would close. Is anything substantive ³lost² by closing the call on the same day the comments close? If so, closing the call beyond the close of the comment period, even if for a matter of a few days to fully consider any comments received late in the process, could make sense. What are your views? Thank you.
Brian
*From:*Grace Abuhamad [mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org] *Sent:* Monday, September 08, 2014 9:49 AM *To:* Theresa Swinehart *Cc:* Brian Cute *Subject:* Re: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
How's this?
*EXTENDED < Call for Candidates: Seeking Advisors to the ICANN Accountability & Governance Coordination Group*
In light of the 6 27 September <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en>public comment period <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-08-2014-09-05-en> on the Enhancing ICANN Accountability and Governance Process, the Public Experts Group has decided to extend its Call for Candidates <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>. The original due date of 10 September is now 27 September at 23:59 UTC, so as to align with the close of the public comment period. With the exception of date, all other elements of the Call for Candidates <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en> remain the same. For more information on how to submit a nomination, please see here <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en>.
I can submit this as a new announcement so that the information is sent out through our announcement system (social media, email, etc), but I also suggest updating the actual Call with the new date and a message about the Extension at the top.
*From: *Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart@icann.org <mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>> *Date: *Monday, September 8, 2014 8:20 AM *To: *Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org <mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org>> *Cc: *Brian Cute <bcute@pir.org <mailto:bcute@pir.org>> *Subject: *FW: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Grace, can you prepare what would be an announcement of the extension for sign-off by Larry, Janis, Jeanette and Brian.
Thanks
Theresa
*From: *Lawrence Strickling <lstrickling@ntia.doc.gov <mailto:lstrickling@ntia.doc.gov>> *Date: *Saturday, September 6, 2014 10:45 AM *To: *Janis Karklins <karklinsj@gmail.com <mailto:karklinsj@gmail.com>>, Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette@wzb.eu <mailto:jeanette@wzb.eu>> *Cc: *Brian Cute <bcute@pir.org <mailto:bcute@pir.org>>, Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart@icann.org <mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>>, Fiona Alexander <FAlexander@ntia.doc.gov <mailto:FAlexander@ntia.doc.gov>>, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@icann.org <mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org>>, Fadi Chehade <fadi.chehade@icann.org <mailto:fadi.chehade@icann.org>> *Subject: *RE: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Make it unanimous.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: Janis Karklins
Date:09/06/2014 4:45 PM (GMT+02:00)
To: Jeanette Hofmann
Cc: Brian Cute , Theresa Swinehart , Larry Strickling , Fiona Alexander , Grace Abuhamad , Fadi Chehade
Subject: Re: question on extending the deadline for call for candidates
Me too.
JK
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette@wzb.eu <mailto:jeanette@wzb.eu>> wrote:
I agree with Brian. Jeanette
On 6 September 2014 13:16:09 CEST, Brian Cute <bcute@pir.org <mailto:bcute@pir.org>> wrote: >I think that is the logical thing to do given the comment period. I >don't know that the substance of the call itself will change in a >material way based on comments received but in light of the ICANN >community's request for the comment period, that would be prudent. > >Brian > >Sent from my iPhone > >On Sep 6, 2014, at 5:25 AM, "Theresa Swinehart" ><theresa.swinehart@icann.org
<mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org><mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org <mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>>>
>wrote: > >All, > >In light of the posting the accountability process for a last >call/round of comments yesterday (6 September) for a 21 day public >comment period, i've been asked whether there would be an extension on >the deadline for the call for candidates to the date the comment period >closes. That is, extend it from 10 September to 27 September. > >I wanted to raise this for your your decision. > >The original call for candidates can be found at: >https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-28-en > >Please let us know if you would like to extend the deadline. If so, >Grace can assist in preparing a revised announcement extending the >deadline for your review, and posting upon your approval. > >Thanks > >Theresa
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
participants (5)
-
Brian Cute -
Grace Abuhamad -
Janis Karklins -
Jeanette Hofmann -
Larry Strickling