Team,On behalf of Alan, below please find our response to Monday's plenary call action item. We were asked to clarify the Rec 2 subgroup's final question and answer in Section 3.3.3, Analysis and Findings -- see page 24 of the 26 August draft. Proposed alternative text appears below:4) Finally, the subgroup considered whether the Board’s request and process framework for a Next-Generation RDS PDP, using the EWG Final Report as input to (and, if appropriate, a foundation for) a new gTLD policy, was effective in producing the single comprehensive RDS (WHOIS) policy envisioned by the WHOIS1 Review Team.It is the RDS-WHOIS2 Review Team's view that, had the plan been executed to completion, a single comprehensive RDS (WHOIS) policy could have emerged. In any event, the ICANN Board-adopted Temporary Specification and the consensus policy expected to result from the Expedited PDP should form the basis for a single RDS (WHOIS) policy. It remains to be seen exactly what additional work, if any, may be need to create a single comprehensive RDS (WHOIS) policy.Any objections or amendments to this proposed alternative text should be sent to the RT mailing list ASAP but no later than 29 August 23.59 UTC.Regards,Lisa
_______________________________________________
RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list
RDS-WHOIS2-RT@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt