Dear Chris and Team Members,

 

I remembered that during last plenary call, Chris had two comments:

1.       The ICANN Board cannot intervene in the GNSO PDP.

2.       The Review Team cannot make recommendations in respect to policy.

 

For the first point, it’s easy to understand, the PDP should be independent as much as possible in the process. However, for the second one, I still have doubts on this. To my understanding, WHOIS is policy, how could the Review Team make recommendations without respect to policy? I believe this is of high relevant to the scope of the review, and looking forward to your kind clarification.

 

Thanks and regards,

Lili

 

 

From: rds-whois2-rt-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rds-whois2-rt-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Alice Jansen
Sent: Friday, 4 August, 2017 12:24 AM
To: RDS WHOIS2-RT List <rds-whois2-rt@icann.org>
Subject: [RDS-WHOIS2-RT] Plenary Call #4 - Action Items/Decisions Reached

 

Dear Review Team Members,

 

Thank you for attending plenary call #4.

 

Call archives will be posted on your wiki page https://community.icann.org/display/WHO/Meeting+%234+-+3+August

 

Action items and decisions reached are as follows:

 

Decisions Reached:

* On observers - Review Team adopts SSR2 approach with caveat that adjustments may be made, as needed

* Review Team Members are expected to prepare questions in advance of implementation briefings and to share with ICANN org/presenters beforehand

 

Action Items:

* ICANN org to follow up on Statements of Interest

* By Aug 14 - 23:59 UTC - Review Team Members to read draft Terms of Reference and to suggest edits and/or offer comments in comment boxes or track-changes

* ICANN org to circulate a v2 that includes comments/input received on draft ToR for Review Team to discuss on plenary call #5

* ICANN org to provide overview of methodology used for implementation and difficulties encountered

* By Aug 14 - 23:59 UTC – Review Team Members to put together short clear paragraph that includes issues you believe should be in the scope, in addition to mandatory items listed in Bylaws

 

A copy of the Terms of Reference is included in the attached.

Thanks,

Kind regards

Alice

***************************************************************************************************
This message, and any attachment contained, are confidential and subject of legal privilege. It may be used solely for the designated police/justice purpose and by the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. The information is not to be disseminated to another agency or third party without the author’s consent, and must not be retained longer than is necessary for the fulfilment of the purpose for which the information is to be used. All practicable steps shall be taken by the recipients to ensure that information is protected against unauthorised access or processing. INTERPOL reserves the right to enquire about the use of the information provided.
If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error. In such a case, you should not print it, copy it, make any use of it or disclose it, but please notify us immediately and delete the message from any computer.
*************************************************************************************************