Dear review team members,
Following up on today’s plenary call #40, please find below the action items/decisions reached. We also attached the “recommendations prioritization” chart which was projected in Adobe Connect.
Status of report:
ADOPTED.
On Executive Summary
Status: Adopted with one edit:
-
Replace "privacy mechanisms" by "informal privacy/proxy mechanisms"
On WHOIS1 Rec #1 - Strategic Priority
Status: Adopted with following edits and recommendation priority
- Replace "significant concern" with "significant importance"
- Add footnote on policy
- Add "ICANN did not take any action to address".to address SP10 and tie to relevant section
- Agreement for R1.1 - 1.2 to be high priority
- Agreement for R1.3 to be medium priority
On WHOIS1 Rec #2 - Single WHOIS Policy
Status: Adopted with following edits:
- Improve readability (SP13)
- Lisa/Alan to draft paragraph to address Stephanie's comment SP14
- Sentence "We would expect the affirmed Temporary Specification will exist as a digital artefact and will be the new base for a single documented source of all things pertaining gTLD Registration Data (WHOIS)." will be removed, to address comment SP16.
- To address SP17: add footnote noting that there was one objection the Board did not notice in its acceptance. Use Accept instead of adopt.
- To address SP18: hopefully instead of likely
On WHOIS Rec #3 – Outreach
Status: Adopted with following edits:
- To address SP19, ICANN org to strike all from introductory sentence in all subgroups' sections
- To address SP20, strike phrase pertaining to educate them
- The first sentence should end "gTLD domains. The content should be revised..."
- Agreement for R3.1 (including two suggested edits) with medium priority
- Include after first sentence of the rationale for 3.2: this need was further supported by parts of the ICANN community
- Agreement for R3.2 to be high priority
On WHOIS1 Rec #4 – Compliance
Status: Adopted with following edits:
- Insert "contract negotiation or" after "in which case" in Feasibility
- Agreement for R4.1 and R4.2 to be high priority
On WHOIS Recs# 5-9 - Data Accuracy
Status: Adopted with following edit:
- Agreement to leave Priority as "To be determined"
- Agreement on rec.5.1
On WHOIS 1 Rec#10 - Privacy/Proxy Services
Status: Adopted with following edits:
- Adjust text to use 31 December 2019 and remove "implementation timeframes notwithstanding"
- Agreement for 10.1 and 10.2 to be low priority
On WHOIS1 Rec#11 - Common Interface
Status: Adopted with following edits:
- Agreement for 11.1 to be low priority
- Agreement for R11.2 to be high priority
On WHOIS1 Recs#12-14 – IDNs
Status: Adopted
- Agreement for R12.1 to be low priority
On WHOIS Recs #15-16
Status: Adopted
- Agreement for R15.1 to be medium priority
On Subgroup 2 Anything New
Status: Adopted
On Subgroup 3 Law Enforcement Needs
Status: Adopted
- Agreement on Rec.LE.1 & LE.2 with high priority
- leave recommendation LE.2 as is, adding "on a regular basis" at the end
- No objections
On Subgroup 4 Consumer Trust
Status: Adopted as is with no recommendations
On Subgroup 5: Safeguarding Registrant Data
Status: Adopted
- Agreement on SG.1 with Medium Priority
On Subgroup 6: ICANN Contractual Compliance
Status: Adopted
- CM.1 is accepted as is with priority "High"
- CM.2: delete comment and accept as written, with Medium Priority
- CM.3: agreed with priority set as "Low"
- CM.4: Agreement for recommendation with "Low" priority. Add a footnote
- CM5: Accepted. Low priority
On ICANN Bylaws:
Status: Adopted
- Rec.BY.1: Adopted with Medium priority.
Next steps
Action Item: ICANN org to complete all of the edits listed above.
-
For any items the review team needs to discuss, review team members to send email with label REPORT URGENT.
-
If further discussion is needed on a unforeseen item, meeting will be held on Tuesday.
Kind regards,
Jean-Baptiste Deroulez