Thank you Alan!

Two recommendations (see in yellow below) , but I'm supporting the current text as well if most members are okay with your text.

Kind regards,
Erika


If a Review Team member is no longer able or willing to serve, or if an SO/AC withdraws its endorsement of the member, the SO/AC making the original endorsement will be requested to refill the position with a new (delete = replacement) member. The SO/AC will make the selection according to their own processes and will not be bound to consider only those candidates who originally applied requesting their endorsement.

If a Review Team member is sufficiently inactive or disruptive as to cause (delete = at leas) (50%) 70% of Review Team members (excluding the member in question) to request their removal, the member will be asked to resign. If the member fails to resign, the SO/AC that endorsed the member will be requested to withdraw their endorsement and replace the member. Should the SO/AC not take action, the member can be removed by a 2/3 majority vote of the remaining Review Team members. In all cases, the balloting will be carried out in such a way as to not reveal how individual members voted.

On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 4:51 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca > wrote:

I was asked to propose wording for the section of the Terms of Reference on Replacement and Removal of Members

I would like to propose the following wording for the consideration of the RT.

Alan

=======

If a Review Team member is no longer able or willing to serve, or if an SO/AC withdraws its endorsement of the member, the SO/AC making the original endorsement will be requested to refill the position with a replacement member. The SO/AC will make the selection according to their own processes and will not be bound to consider only those candidates who originally applied requesting their endorsement.

If a Review Team member is sufficiently inactive or disruptive as to cause at least 50% of Review Team members (excluding the member in question) to request their removal, the member will be asked to resign. If the member fails to resign, the SO/AC that endorsed the member will be requested to withdraw their endorsement and replace the member. Should the SO/AC not take action, the member can be removed by a 2/3 majority vote of the remaining Review Team members. In all cases, the balloting will be carried out in such a way as to not reveal how individual members voted.

_______________________________________________

RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list

RDS-WHOIS2-RT@icann.org

https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt