I made a few emendations.  See them inline.

One is the matter of appointment, isn't it the Board that appoints the RT member? If my understanding is correct, then some changes I propose shall apply. If not, then strike them.

-Carlton


==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround

=============================

On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
I was asked to propose wording for the section of the Terms of Reference on Replacement and Removal of Members

I would like to propose the following wording for the consideration of the RT.

Alan

=======

If a Review Team member is no longer able or willing to serve, or if an SO/AC withdraws its endorsement of the member, the SO/AC making the original endorsement will be requested to
​make a new endorsement for 
the position
.​
. The SO/AC will make the selection according to their own
​rules and ​
processes and
​shall
 not be bound to consider only those candidates who originally applied
​and ​
request
​ed
 their endorsement.

If a Review Team member is
​deemed by the evidence 
sufficiently inactive or disruptive as to cause at least
​2/3rd
 of Review Team members (excluding the member in question) to request their removal, the member will be asked to
​withdraw
. If the member fails to
​withdraw
, the SO/AC that endorsed the member will be requested to withdraw their endorsement
​ and request the member resign.
 Should the SO/AC not take action, the member can be
​excluded from the Review Team
 by a 2/3
​rd​
majority vote of the remaining Review Team members. In all cases, the balloting will be carried out in such a way as to not reveal how individual members voted.

_______________________________________________
RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list
RDS-WHOIS2-RT@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt


Virus-free. www.avast.com