I agree. After the 4^th F2F meeting, it should be reflected as Full Consensus.

From: RDS-WHOIS2-RT [mailto:rds-whois2-rt-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Carlton Samuels
Sent: Saturday, 2 February, 2019 7:45 AM
To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>
Cc: RDS WHOIS2-RT List <rds-whois2-rt@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [RDS-WHOIS2-RT] Measurement of Consensus

It should be repoeted as Full Consensus. Accentuate the positive!

Carlton

On Wed, 30 Jan 2019, 6:02 pm Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca wrote:

In our draft report, for each recommendation, we reported "Level of
Consensus" as "No objections".

Shouldn't that be reported as "Full Consensus"?

That states it in a positive instead of negative way, and is also
what is specified in our Terms of Reference.

Alan

_______________________________________________
RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list
RDS-WHOIS2-RT@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt