I am not sure how much this future ruling will clarify beyond what has already been pointed out, namely that the temp specs are incomplete on the rationale and assessment of necessity and proportionality. Even if that were included in the submission (which I have not yet read), the submission alone cannot fix the underlying flaw of the missing policy elements.

Cathrin

Am 14.06.2018 um 15:11 schrieb Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com>:

..allegedly because the 'definitive' question was not answered by earlier ruling.

A worthy end game I should think. But still looks like slim pickings from here, especially in current political climate.

https://domainnamewire.com/2018/06/14/icann-appeals-german-court-ruling-as-it-seeks-definitive-ruling-on-gdpr-and-whois-data-collection/

-Carlton

==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
=============================

_______________________________________________
RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list
RDS-WHOIS2-RT@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt