Hi Cathrin,
Without going into the details of the GNSO proposal (which I will
shortly), by saying the GAC does not endorse the last point in the GNSO
Proposal (ensure no duplication of work between the RDS-RT and the GNSO
RDS PDP), are you saying that the GAC supports us duplicating the RDS PDP
work?
Alan
At 22/06/2017 04:32 PM, Cathrin.BAUER-BULST@ec.europa.eu wrote:
Hi Alice, hi team,
Sounds like September – perhaps 2nd half? – is a possibility.
I would also be available, same goes for the rest of the autumn. Having
one meeting before ICANN60 and one at ICANN60 is a good idea. In general,
I would have a preference for combining Review Team meetings with other
meetings most or all of us attend if possible – for me that would be
ICANN and the IGF this autumn/winter.
I would support Alan's proposal on the briefing which would no doubt be
helpful as a baseline. I would also be interested in seeing the work plan
of the previous review team or of a similar exercise, so as to have an
idea of next steps, useful frequency of meetings, realistic deadlines for
deliverables with a team this size etc. – this might also help us with
the scope discussion. On scope, you may already be aware that the GAC has
largely endorsed the GNSO proposal, with the exception of the last point
on overlaps with the RDS PDP.
Looking forward to meeting you all in Johannesburg.
Best regards
Cathrin
From: rds-whois2-rt-bounces@icann.org
[
mailto:rds-whois2-rt-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Alan
Greenberg
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 4:24 PM
To: Alice Jansen; RDS WHOIS2-RT List
Subject: Re: [RDS-WHOIS2-RT] GUIDANCE NEEDED - Planning
Hi Alice,
I think a September meeting would be fine. Exactly how much work we will
do before that is less clear, for the same reason holding an earlier
meeting would be problematic. Certainly, we can start talking about
scope, and leadership. And as I said in my previous message, I think the
decisions should be in that order.
I would definitely plan at least a 1-day and perhaps 2-day meeting prior
to ICANN60. And I would schedule a consultation session or sessions. I
think we will need to discuss whether we do a single session with the
entire community, or meetings with each AC/SO, or both.
I again suggest that prior to our doing almost anything, I would like to
have a written briefing from staff on the recommendations of the first
WHIS-RT, their implementation methodology and current status, and any
other comments that staff has. I am attaching a comparable document given
to ATRT2. I am NOT suggesting that the new document be patterned after
this one, as it had a number of critical flaws, but am including it
solely to demonstrate that such a thing is possible. This one was created
at the request of ATRT2 to fill a gap in its understanding of the WHOIS
RT Recommendations. I also note that ATRT2 made a very specific
recommendation that such reports be prepared for future review teams and
this recommendation was accepted by the Board. Specifically:
11.4. Complete implementation reports
The Board should prepare a complete implementation report to be ready by
review kick-off. This report should be submitted for public consultation,
and relevant benchmarks and metrics must be incorporated in the
report.
Regards, Alan
At 22/06/2017 06:12 AM, Alice Jansen wrote:
Dear Review Team Members,
Your first Face-to-Face Meeting
In light of your decision to not hold your first face-to-face meeting
during ICANN 59 and to meet informally instead, we wish to seek your
guidance on when you envision holding your first in-person session so we
may plan accordingly.
As many tend to take time off in July-August, we would suggest holding
your first face-to-face session in early September 2017 and scheduling
calls throughout July-August to advance work, as appropriate.
Please advise whether the September timeframe is acceptable and if you
have any dates to suggest for the meeting and/or conflicts we should be
mindful of. This is a suggestion for your consideration – should you wish
to schedule a meeting earlier, or have other suggestions, please share
using this list.
In addition, we would also welcome any suggestions you may have on
meeting location (subject to budget, availability etc.) so we may relay
them to the meetings team to inform their venue search. For instance, we
have a meeting room in Brussels, at the ICANN office, which could
potentially be used for this meeting.
ICANN 60
For planning purposes –“ kindly note that as indicated in the slides
presented on your call #1, we have been given the following deadlines to
request a one-day session at ICANN 60 (Abu Dhabi – 28 Oct-3 Nov
2017):
· 30 June – deadline for
any sessiions to be held prior to the ICANN 60 program;
· 30 July - deadline for
any sessions to be held during the ICANN 60 program
We would be grateful if the Review Team could let us know by the 30 June
due date if you wish to hold a meeting prior to ICANN 60 and if there is
interest in holding a public consultation during ICANN 60.
We look forward to reading your input.
Thanks,
Best regards
Alice
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
1;DM5PR03MB2714;27:FDqlXOg++4Y0Fz5YMVuBWh5+YvyTsymIMYOZPIImiokqH41ogt4kQWt+Mmlq4Z2k5/sjF5fTqOk2I3VLSHy5EuZtj7Ty+gseqk1b0+DKMp302brm5TQQL8j6IwwjKTT9IgqeJXihpDaeTO2GEgKCCw==
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Mailbox-Delivery:
ex:0;auth:0;dest:I;ENG:(400001000128)(400125000095)(20160514016)(520000050)(520002050)(750028)(400001001212)(400125100095)(61617095)(400001002128)(400125200095);
_______________________________________________
RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list
RDS-WHOIS2-RT@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt