Volker - Yeah, read it. Once you start such a case, it's hard to find a good way in ending it ... ECJ ... maybe, one day. Not wanting to make a judgement but this language is a bit bizarre "The Appellate Court fundamentally misunderstands the Applicant's request when it assumes a performance injunction instead of a cease and desist injunction. The Applicant has requested the Defendant to cease and desist from offering and/or selling second level domain names in violation of the RAA it has with the Applicant. The injunction would merely require the Defendant stop what it is doing: This is the very essence of a cease and desist claim. It is undisputed between the parties that the Defendant is not obliged to offer or sell domain name registrations under the RAA in case the Senate grants the order." Cheers, Erika On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 11:46 AM, Volker Greimann <vgreimann@key-systems.net

wrote:

The saga continues:

https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/litigation-icann -v-epag-icann-plea-remonstrance-redacted-17aug18-en.pdf

Will we be surprised by the results of this round? I doubt it!

Best regards,

Volker A. Greimann

_______________________________________________ RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list RDS-WHOIS2-RT@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt