I will leave the discussion of removal until the meeting, since this seems to be an issue of general dispute in a variety of ways. On reappointing, under the previous rules in the AoC, it was the CEO and Chair of the GAC who made the original selections (from among those endorsed by the AC/SOs and applicants as experts. The AoC was silent on replacements But if a replacement was needed, it was done by the AC/SO that originally had endorsed the person that is leaving. Under the new Bylaws, it is the Chairs of the AC?SO that make the selections and I am proposing that we do not change the method of replacement. There is no precedent from the SSR, the only other review being conducted after the Bylaws, since the ToR is MUCH expanded from the version that they used. As such, it is up to us to make a recommendation and the Board can accept or reject it. I support a minimalist approach. Alan At 28/08/2017 12:44 PM, Carlton Samuels wrote:

I made a few emendations. See them inline.

One is the matter of appointment, isn't it the Board that appoints the RT member? If my understanding is correct, then some changes I propose shall apply. If not, then strike them.

-Carlton

============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: <tel:(876)%20818-1799>876-818-1799 Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround =============================

On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Alan Greenberg <<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote: I was asked to propose wording for the section of the Terms of Reference on Replacement and Removal of Members

I would like to propose the following wording for the consideration of the RT.

Alan

=======

If a Review Team member is no longer able or willing to serve, or if an SO/AC withdraws its endorsement of the member, the SO/AC making the original endorsement will be requested to ​make a new endorsement for the position .​ . The SO/AC will make the selection according to their own ​rules and ​ processes and ​shall not be bound to consider only those candidates who originally applied ​and ​ request ​ed their endorsement.

If a Review Team member is ​deemed by the evidence ​ sufficiently inactive or disruptive as to cause at least ​2/3rd of Review Team members (excluding the member in question) to request their removal, the member will be asked to ​withdraw . If the member fails to ​withdraw , the SO/AC that endorsed the member will be requested to withdraw their endorsement ​ and request the member resign. Should the SO/AC not take action, the member can be ​excluded from the Review Team by a 2/3 ​rd​ majority vote of the remaining Review Team members. In all cases, the balloting will be carried out in such a way as to not reveal how individual members voted.

_______________________________________________ RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list <mailto:RDS-WHOIS2-RT@icann.org>RDS-WHOIS2-RT@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt

Virus-free. <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>www.avast.com