Hi Dennis,
I’m concerned that our next call is May 15 and the Temp. Spec. expires just days after that…doesn’t give a lot of time for us to get this completed. What are the specific steps that need to happen for this “bridging mechanism” to be finalized
and in place?
I’d suggest either we look to have a call prior to that or use the mailing list to ensure we are in a good place to have something locked in prior to the expiration of the Temp. Spec.
Again, wasn’t on the call today so apologies if this was already discussed earlier.
Regards,
Matt
From: "RegDataPolicy.PreIRT" <regdatapolicy.preirt-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Dennis Chang <dennis.chang@icann.org>
Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 at 2:15 PM
To: theo geurts <gtheo@xs4all.nl>, Elizabeth Bacon <beth@pir.org>, "Plaut, Diane" <Diane.Plaut@corsearch.com>, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@icannpolicy.ninja>, Sarah Wyld <swyld@tucows.com>
Cc: "regdatapolicy.preirt@icann.org" <regdatapolicy.preirt@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [RegDataPolicy.PreIRT] [Ext] Re: Prioritization of draft bridge policy review vs recommendation review
Right!
Please do review it before our next meeting (homework) since we are implementing this one now.
Write in your comment that you agree with the IPT’s analysis if you do.
Thanks
Dennis Chang
From:
theo geurts <gtheo@xs4all.nl>
Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 at 1:11 PM
To: Dennis Chang <dennis.chang@icann.org>, Elizabeth Bacon <beth@pir.org>, "Plaut, Diane" <Diane.Plaut@corsearch.com>, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@icannpolicy.ninja>, Sarah Wyld <swyld@tucows.com>
Cc: "regdatapolicy.preirt@icann.org" <regdatapolicy.preirt@icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] Re: [RegDataPolicy.PreIRT] Prioritization of draft bridge policy review vs recommendation review
yeah I think we are all on the same page here Dennis.
28, first thing on the agenda for the next call, right?
Best,
Theo Geurts CIPP/E
Contractual Compliance & Privacy Officer | Realtime Register B.V.
Ceintuurbaan 32A
8024 AA - ZWOLLE - The Netherlands
T: +31.384530759
F: +31.384524734
U:
www.realtimeregister.com [realtimeregister.com]
On 24-4-2019 22:05, Dennis Chang wrote:
Is everyone piled on?
Ok then, let the fun being on 28.
Glad to hear you all agree that Rec 28 is a priority.
It was for me if you think about it.
It had to be for me to pulled together the implementation team: IPT and pre-IRT.
Without it we wouldn’t have this email group to be having the discussion.
I am very happy to see such an enthusiastic and engaging team.
I can feel that we are jelling as a team – becoming well aligned.
So, one more pre-IRT homework.
Check your workbook and add your comment to Rec 28.
Thanks
Dennis Chang
From: "RegDataPolicy.PreIRT" <regdatapolicy.preirt-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Elizabeth Bacon <beth@pir.org>
Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 at 12:52 PM
To: "Plaut, Diane" <Diane.Plaut@corsearch.com>, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@icannpolicy.ninja>, Sarah Wyld <swyld@tucows.com>
Cc: "regdatapolicy.preirt@icann.org" <regdatapolicy.preirt@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [RegDataPolicy.PreIRT] Prioritization of draft bridge policy review vs recommendation review
Just piling on. I agree!
From: RegDataPolicy.PreIRT <regdatapolicy.preirt-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Plaut, Diane
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 3:03 PM
To: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@icannpolicy.ninja>; Sarah Wyld <swyld@tucows.com>
Cc: regdatapolicy.preirt@icann.org
Subject: Re: [RegDataPolicy.PreIRT] Prioritization of draft bridge policy review vs recommendation review
I agree with Amr and Sarah, Rec. 28 has to be a priority.
Best, Diane
Diane Plaut
General Counsel and Privacy Officer
Direct +1 646-899-2806 diane.plaut@corsearch.com
220 West 42nd Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10036, United States www.corsearch.com [corsearch.com]
Join Corsearch on Twitter [twitter.com] Linkedin [linkedin.com] Trademarks + Brands [trademarksandbrands.corsearch.com]
Customer Service/Platform Support: 1 800 SEARCH1™ (1 800 732 7241) Corsearch.USCustomerService@corsearch.com
Confidentiality Notice: This email and its attachments (if any) contain confidential information of the sender. The information is intended only for the use by the direct addressees of the original sender of this email. If you are not an intended recipient of the original sender (or responsible for delivering the message to such person), you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance of the contents of and attachments to this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender at the address shown herein and permanently delete any copies of this email (digital or paper) in your possession.
From: "RegDataPolicy.PreIRT" <regdatapolicy.preirt-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@icannpolicy.ninja>
Reply-To: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@icannpolicy.ninja>
Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 at 2:21 PM
To: Sarah Wyld <swyld@tucows.com>
Cc: "regdatapolicy.preirt@icann.org" <regdatapolicy.preirt@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [RegDataPolicy.PreIRT] Prioritization of draft bridge policy review vs recommendation review
Hi,
Thanks for this, Sarah. I obviously agree with all of it. :-) Also wanted to add that should we need to hold a call to wrap rec #28 up, we should probably schedule one prior to the next call on 15 May.
Thanks again.
Amr
On Apr 24, 2019, at 8:15 PM, Sarah Wyld <swyld@tucows.com> wrote:
Hello,
Thank you all for a productive meeting today, I was very glad to see this team start going through the recommendations and confirming that #2 and #3 do not require IRT action. I'm also interested in the planned schedule for recommendation review, as Beth mentioned. We'd be happy to work ahead in the Google Sheet to provide input.
That said, I want to emphasize again as discussed on our call today that I'd like to see a draft of the bridging Policy document before it is published. I strongly agree with Amr's point that this draft Policy review should be the immediate priority for this team, and I am curious about Dennis's comment that Rec. 28 was skipped on purpose. This bridging Policy is the first real hurdle for the IRT to clear, it needs to be completed before any recommendation analysis is due, and I do think that if a draft can be shared with the team in the next few days, we would have sufficient time to review and provide any feedback before it needs to be finalized in mid-May.
Thanks,
Sarah--Sarah WyldDomains Product TeamTucows+1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392<signature.asc>
_______________________________________________RegDataPolicy.PreIRT mailing listRegDataPolicy.PreIRT@icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/regdatapolicy.preirt
