Is everyone piled on?

Ok then, let the fun being on 28.

Glad to hear you all agree that Rec 28 is a priority.

It was for me if you think about it.

It had to be for me to pulled together the implementation team: IPT and pre-IRT.

Without it we wouldn’t have this email group to be having the discussion.

I am very happy to see such an enthusiastic and engaging team.

I can feel that we are jelling as a team – becoming well aligned.

So, one more pre-IRT homework.

Check your workbook and add your comment to Rec 28.

Thanks

Dennis Chang

From: "RegDataPolicy.PreIRT" <regdatapolicy.preirt-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Elizabeth Bacon <beth@pir.org>
Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 at 12:52 PM
To: "Plaut, Diane" <Diane.Plaut@corsearch.com>, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@icannpolicy.ninja>, Sarah Wyld <swyld@tucows.com>
Cc: "regdatapolicy.preirt@icann.org" <regdatapolicy.preirt@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [RegDataPolicy.PreIRT] Prioritization of draft bridge policy review vs recommendation review

Just piling on.  I agree!

From: RegDataPolicy.PreIRT <regdatapolicy.preirt-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Plaut, Diane
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 3:03 PM
To: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@icannpolicy.ninja>; Sarah Wyld <swyld@tucows.com>
Cc: regdatapolicy.preirt@icann.org
Subject: Re: [RegDataPolicy.PreIRT] Prioritization of draft bridge policy review vs recommendation review

I agree with Amr and Sarah, Rec. 28 has to be a priority.

Best, Diane

Diane Plaut

General Counsel and Privacy Officer

Direct +1 646-899-2806 
diane.plaut@corsearch.com

220 West 42^nd Street, 11^th Floor, New York, NY 10036, United States
www.corsearch.com

Join Corsearch on   Twitter Linkedin Trademarks + Brands

Customer Service/Platform Support: 1 800 SEARCH1™ (1 800 732 7241)
Corsearch.USCustomerService@corsearch.com

Confidentiality Notice: This email and its attachments (if any) contain confidential information of the sender. The information is intended only for the use by the direct addressees of the original sender of this email. If you are not an intended recipient of the original sender (or responsible for delivering the message to such person), you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance of the contents of and attachments to this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender at the address shown herein and permanently delete any copies of this email (digital or paper) in your possession.

From: "RegDataPolicy.PreIRT" <regdatapolicy.preirt-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@icannpolicy.ninja>
Reply-To: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@icannpolicy.ninja>
Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 at 2:21 PM
To: Sarah Wyld <swyld@tucows.com>
Cc: "regdatapolicy.preirt@icann.org" <regdatapolicy.preirt@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [RegDataPolicy.PreIRT] Prioritization of draft bridge policy review vs recommendation review

Hi,

Thanks for this, Sarah. I obviously agree with all of it. :-) Also wanted to add that should we need to hold a call to wrap rec #28 up, we should probably schedule one prior to the next call on 15 May.

Thanks again.

Amr

On Apr 24, 2019, at 8:15 PM, Sarah Wyld <swyld@tucows.com> wrote:

Hello,

Thank you all for a productive meeting today, I was very glad to see this team start going through the recommendations and confirming that #2 and #3 do not require IRT action. I'm also interested in the planned schedule for recommendation review, as Beth mentioned. We'd be happy to work ahead in the Google Sheet to provide input.

That said, I want to emphasize again as discussed on our call today that I'd like to see a draft of the bridging Policy document before it is published. I strongly agree with Amr's point that this draft Policy review should be the immediate priority for this team, and I am curious about Dennis's comment that Rec. 28 was skipped on purpose. This bridging Policy is the first real hurdle for the IRT to clear, it needs to be completed before any recommendation analysis is due, and I do think that if a draft can be shared with the team in the next few days, we would have sufficient time to review and provide any feedback before it needs to be finalized in mid-May.

Thanks,

Sarah

--
Sarah Wyld
Domains Product Team
Tucows
+1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392
 
 

<signature.asc>