Bob,

I think you are a little confused.  Pool.com is not a Registrar and never has been.  It can not be a member of the Registrar Constituency.

And the acquisition registrars we have are prevented from being members of the constituency by the bylaws.  I believe you advocated the changes to the bylaws that prevent registrars owned by the same entity from being members.

Rob

From: owner-registrars@gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-registrars@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 2:00 AM
To: Registrars Constituency; RC Voting Members
Subject: RE: [registrars] Dues of $750 with "forgiveness" for those who choose to pay $250.

At 03:33 AM 7/30/2007 Monday  +0000, Rob Hall wrote:

And I think you will find that most of the letters we signed onto were not official constituency positions, as those are voted.  Rather, when an open call went out for a simple letter to ICANN by some Registrars, we supported it with everything we had. 

Dear Rob: 2007 is the current year. 

In a court of law, this kind of act would be ruled a "common law marriage".

BobC