RE: [registrars] thoughts for conference today
Hello Larry,
2) Self Policing. We should be exploring ways to lessen the administrative burden that ICANN has by assuming as many (or all) of the enforcement issues as a group, so that ICANN doesn't have to increase fees to do the same thing that we can probably do for less money. I think that an organization setup and funded by registrars can take care of the issues for 25% of what it would cost for ICANN to do the same. I would be willing to support such an organization.
This idea has appeal. I find it hard that every year we are asked to pay more for Compliance but I have never actually seen any compliance done. With respect to policy development - most of this is done by those outside of the ICANN staff (ie the cost is not paid for by ICANN). Regards, Bruce
if self policing is good then i am sure everyone won't mind if I audit their whois ;-) Bruce Tonkin wrote:
Hello Larry,
2) Self Policing. We should be exploring ways to lessen the administrative burden that ICANN has by assuming as many (or all) of the enforcement issues as a group, so that ICANN doesn't have to increase fees to do the same thing that we can probably do for less money. I think that an organization setup and funded by registrars can take care of the issues for 25% of what it would cost for ICANN to do the same. I would be willing to support such an organization.
This idea has appeal. I find it hard that every year we are asked to pay more for Compliance but I have never actually seen any compliance done. With respect to policy development - most of this is done by those outside of the ICANN staff (ie the cost is not paid for by ICANN).
Regards, Bruce
As it was very early here in Japan (6:00am) for the conference call and I just had the nomcom call before (4:00 to 6:00am) I couldn't stay until the end of the call today. I've listenned to the first hour and then I gave up under the sleep pressure ;-) So anyone has some notes of what happened the second half of the call? Will be nice for the next conference call to think about the asia pacifique region because until now the timing was not really asia friendly. Jean-Michel
Rick Wesson wrote:
if self policing is good then i am sure everyone won't mind if I audit their whois ;-)
Rick, An "organization setup and funded by registrars" doesn't mean operated by registrars or that registrars would have access to any information. Larry Erlich
Bruce Tonkin wrote:
Hello Larry,
2) Self Policing. We should be exploring ways to lessen the administrative burden that ICANN has by assuming as many (or all) of the enforcement issues as a group, so that ICANN doesn't have to increase fees to do the same thing that we can probably do for less money. I think that an organization setup and funded by registrars can take care of the issues for 25% of what it would cost for ICANN to do the same. I would be willing to support such an organization.
This idea has appeal. I find it hard that every year we are asked to pay more for Compliance but I have never actually seen any compliance done. With respect to policy development - most of this is done by those outside of the ICANN staff (ie the cost is not paid for by ICANN).
Regards, Bruce
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Larry Erlich - DomainRegistry.com, Inc. 215-244-6700 - FAX:215-244-6605 - Reply: erlich@DomainRegistry.com -----------------------------------------------------------------
participants (4)
-
Bruce Tonkin -
Jean-Michel Becar -
Larry Erlich -
Rick Wesson