Hi, it seems that this mail only reached a part of the list participants, so here comes the second attempt. Yours, Marcus ----- Forwarded message from Marcus Faure -----
From faure Thu Aug 26 15:52:28 2004 Subject: New transfer policy concerns To: registrars@dnso.org Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:52:28 +0200 (CEST) From: "Marcus Faure" <faure@globvill.de> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL60 (25)]
Hi, I am beginning to ask myself if the enforcement of the new transfer policy will take effect on November 12. I will share my experience with verisign and pir as we are responsible for the communication with these registries inside CORE. - Both registries have not published any documentation or software regarding registry changes, e.g. transfer undos - verisign has not confirmed that they will use authinfo codes after epp transition - verisign told us there is no "dead end" date for rrp, meaning some registrars will be on epp and some may stay on rrp (forever?). There is no information how transfers will work between rrp and epp registrars - verisign will stay thin, whois standardization is not around. This means that all existing registrars will have to implement a new whois parser for each new registrar that show up. This can't be it. And these are only the major issues. I wonder how we should solve this before November. Yours, Marcus ----- End of forwarded message from Marcus Faure -----
Marcus, Thanks for the resend. I'd mentioned that item of mail and one on the PROVREG list to Carolyn Hoover on August 26th: I'll write the "gang" (self, Tom, Tim, Jordyn, and Ross) and start the RC discussion of EPP issues. Marcus Faure (CORE) send a recent note on transfer policy, and on the (nearly defunct) ietf provreg wg list, James Gould (VGRS) recenty sent a query on registries' implementation of <poll> response. You may have seen both already in those, or other contexts. Carolyn has both of these items of mail. Eric
participants (2)
-
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine -
Marcus Faure