Please see email below as this apparently did not go to the CCG members. Thank you, Anne Anne Aikman-Scalese GNSO Councilor NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026 anneicanngnso@gmail.com ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Anne ICANN <anneicanngnso@gmail.com> Date: Mon, May 18, 2026 at 3:47 PM Subject: Re: [Ext] [Reviewsccg] Work Plan to ICANN86 To: Karen Lentz <karen.lentz@icann.org> Cc: Osvaldo Novoa <osvaldo.j.novoa@gmail.com>, Sophie Hey < sophie.hey@comlaude.com> Thanks Karen, It would appear based on comments received thus far, including the comment from the ICANN Board, that the issues raised involve more than "clarifications'. I note that the next meeting appears to conflict with the GNSO Council meeting and also note that active members of the CCG may not have had time to review all the comments filed to date as shown in your link below. So as an Observer, I would once again question the timeline in that it proposes finalizing the Refined Outline without devoting time to the analysis of the input received from Nominating Organizations (and GNSO SOs and ACs), as well as the ICANN Board and ICANN Org. Those inputs deserve independent discussion before finalizing the Refined Outline. See, in particular, the Board comments filed today, May 18, at the link provided by Karen and pasted again here: https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/CDOR/pages/1114800138/Requ... Anne Anne Aikman-Scalese GNSO Councilor NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026 anneicanngnso@gmail.com On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 6:48 AM Karen Lentz <karen.lentz@icann.org> wrote:

Hi Anne,

Please let us know if we can help with any clarifications. FYI, 2 responses have come in so far today, from ccNSO and NCSG, available here:

https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/CDOR/pages/1114800138/Requ...

Best regards,

Karen

*From: *Anne ICANN <anneicanngnso@gmail.com> *Date: *Tuesday, May 12, 2026 at 4:56 AM *To: *Karen Lentz <karen.lentz@icann.org> *Cc: *Osvaldo Novoa <osvaldo.j.novoa@gmail.com>, Sophie Hey < sophie.hey@comlaude.com> *Subject: *Re: [Ext] [Reviewsccg] Work Plan to ICANN86

Thanks Karen - so it appears there is a bit of disconnect here. I know IPC had one brief discussion on a policy call some time ago and intends to provide input.

Anne

Anne Aikman-Scalese

GNSO Councilor

NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026

anneicanngnso@gmail.com

On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 1:03 PM Karen Lentz <karen.lentz@icann.org> wrote:

Hi Anne,

Currently the CCG has not received any input submissions (they were requested by 12 May). They were requested to be sent to the inputonreviews@icann.org email address, and will be publicly visible in the archive [lists.icann.org] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.icann.org/hyperkitty/list/inputonre...> as well when received.

Best regards,

Karen

*From: *Anne ICANN <anneicanngnso@gmail.com> *Date: *Monday, May 11, 2026 at 12:20 PM *To: *Osvaldo Novoa <osvaldo.j.novoa@gmail.com> *Cc: *Karen Lentz <karen.lentz@icann.org>, Sophie Hey < sophie.hey@comlaude.com> *Subject: *Re: [Ext] [Reviewsccg] Work Plan to ICANN86

Hi Karen,

Could you please advise how many submissions from SGs and Cs in GNSO have been received?

Thank you,

Anne

Anne Aikman-Scalese

GNSO Councilor

NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026

anneicanngnso@gmail.com

On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 11:12 AM Osvaldo Novoa <osvaldo.j.novoa@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello Karen,

You are right, in the last update to the Council it was decided that each SG or C should send its observations and comments directly to the CCG.

Best regards,

Osvaldo

On 11 May 2026, at 12:50 PM, Karen Lentz <karen.lentz@icann.org> wrote:

Hello Anne,

Thank you for your note. If I recall correctly, this was discussed in the Council and it was expected that that SGs would provide input rather than the Council itself. Inviting Osvaldo and Sophie to confirm.

Best regards,

Karen

*From: *Anne ICANN <anneicanngnso@gmail.com> *Date: *Saturday, May 9, 2026 at 12:12 PM *To: *Karen Lentz <karen.lentz@icann.org> *Cc: *reviewsccg-owner--- via Reviewsccg <reviewsccg@icann.org>, Osvaldo Novoa <osvaldo.j.novoa@gmail.com>, Sophie Hey <sophie.hey@comlaude.com> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: [Reviewsccg] Work Plan to ICANN86

Hi Karen - with respect to the timing, I don't see how the GNSO as a Nominating Group, can supply input by the deadline specified. The document was issued a day after the last Council meeting and the next Council meeting is May 21. I don't even know if this is on the Council agenda so I have copied Osvaldo and Sophie.

What is the CCG expectation in this regard?

Anne

Anne Aikman-Scalese

GNSO Councilor

NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026

anneicanngnso@gmail.com

On Sat, May 9, 2026 at 11:38 AM Karen Lentz via Reviewsccg < reviewsccg@icann.org> wrote:

Dear CCG Members,

To inform the Next Steps item on Tuesday’s agenda, below is a proposed work plan incorporating 2 meetings/week (Tuesday and Thursday) to allow for consideration of inputs received from nominating groups before ICANN86. The additions (additional to what is already scheduled) are shown in blue textbelow.

12 May – Plenary call (21 UTC) – Nominating group inputs due

14 May – Plenary call (21 UTC) on Accountability & Transparency section

19 May – Plenary call (6 UTC) on Structural Review section

21 May – CCG Prep Week session (15 UTC) (possible additional Plenary if needed)

26 May – Plenary call (14 UTC) on On-Demand section

28 May – Plenary call (14 UTC) on Purpose, One-Time Review sections, and Contingency for remaining topics

2 June – Open public comment

This plan will be discussed on your 12 May CCG call.

Best regards,

Karen

_______________________________________________ Reviewsccg mailing list -- reviewsccg@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to reviewsccg-leave@icann.org