Hi Roger,
Thank you for your message. We are currently checking internally regarding your question on Registrar access to Registry URS Contacts in NSp. We’ll get back to you as soon as we have more clarity.
Best,
Antonietta
From:
rcarney--- via RPM-IRT <rpm-irt@icann.org>
Reply-To: "rcarney@godaddy.com" <rcarney@godaddy.com>
Date: Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 12:50 PM
To: "rpm-irt@icann.org" <rpm-irt@icann.org>
Subject: [RPM-IRT] Re: Update on Implementation of URS Recommendation #12 (Group 3)
Good Afternoon,
Thanks Antonietta for the continued updates as we make progress.
I will admit that I do not access NSp unless I am told to, so I wanted to get clarity on Registrar access to Registry URS Contacts. Specifically, do/should Registrars have access
to Registry URS Contacts in NSp? I don't think this is technically required by Rec 12/URS Procedures paragraph 4, but it is the only link that this not mentioned below between the three parties (Provider/Registry/Registrar).
Thanks
Roger
From: Antonietta Mangiacotti via RPM-IRT <rpm-irt@icann.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2025 1:25 PM
To: rpm-irt@icann.org <rpm-irt@icann.org>
Cc: Eduardo Duarte <eduardo.duarte@icann.org>
Subject: [RPM-IRT] Update on Implementation of URS Recommendation #12 (Group 3)
Dear RPM IRT, We are writing to provide an update on the work related to the implementation of Group 3 recommendations. This group includes one recommendation,
URS Final Recommendation #12: “The Working Group recommends that the ICANN org, Registries,
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Dear RPM IRT,
We are writing to provide an update on the work related to the implementation of Group 3 recommendations. This group includes one recommendation,
URS Final Recommendation
#12:
“The Working Group recommends that the ICANN org, Registries, Registrars, and URS Providers take appropriate steps to ensure that each other’s contact details are up to date in
order to effectively fulfill the notice requirements set forth in the URS Procedure paragraph 4.”
Below is a summary of the work that was undertaken to ensure all relevant parties have access to accurate and current contact information in order to ensure the efficacy of the URS
process.
This process is facilitated through the
Naming
Services portal (NSp), where new URS contact roles—specifically, URS Primary and Secondary Contacts—were introduced. These fields were pre-populated using the registrar’s Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution (UDRP) Primary
and Secondary contact data. ICANN org communicated the creation of these new roles to the Registrars on
27
May 2025. Registrars were also reminded that per the
URS High-Level
Technical Requirements, Accredited Registrars are required to maintain the URS contact information up to date for the purpose of receiving URS communications. Registrars who wish to review or make any changes to their URS
Primary or Secondary contact information in the NSp, can submit a Contact Update Request in the portal.
In addition, please note that the
URS
High-Level Technical Requirements already included the steps for this process (see page 7). Since the process has now been created, there is no need to update the existing requirements.
Please note that ICANN communicates with contracted parties and URS Providers regarding URS-related matters through established channels, including direct
correspondence via account managers. Additionally, both ICANN and contracted parties can access the URS Providers' contact information through the URS page on the ICANN website, which provides links to the various URS Provider websites:
https://www.icann.org/urs-en.
Please let us know if you have any questions related to the information above.
Thank you!
Best,
Antonietta