as long as we're piling on:

Wes Hardaker wrote on 2020-08-07 15:40:


Thanks, this is very useful information! If that continues to be true, there is probably not much that the Caucus could help on in drafting the document.

Hi Paul,

Adding I think one more data point: the purpose of the document is not technical (aside from referencing/copying 047 like others have said), but rather from the business side of things: what would look acceptable to existing RSOs to consider signing once one comes out.  As Fred said, it's really just a business/contract-side thought exercise with zero new technical work in it.

for my part, if anything comes up that exceeds the state of the 047 technical art, i will urge that it be brought to the caucus.

--
Sent from Postbox