On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 07:01, George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> wrote:

The proposal needs to address algorithm rollover in more detail. Why
is it not proposed for this next change, when adoption of shorter
hash/signatures would impact directly on the packetsize related
problems of extended periods of operation with increased signature
counts?

+1 there should be a predictable timeline for algorithm rollover and as a result a advance timeline for study, review, and testing work on this. Otherwise there will be no actual work on this.

Davey