RSSAC Caucus Local Perspective Tool Work Party next call on October 15th
Dear RSSAC Caucus Members, Myself, Ozan, Abdulkarim and Ken had a call on Monday to discuss the RSSAC Caucus Local Perspective Tool Work Party. We discussed the narratives and agree to merge narratives #5 and #7 in the document, and to delete narrative #6 as it falls within the scope of the Rogue RSO Work Party. I’ve updated the narratives document to suggest these changes. User Narratives Google Document <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1enH6LjICyAbKVr7ssps_4KapecRAROK0nZrw2ihS...> Another thing we provisionally decided was that it would be out of scope for the work party to define how data should be collected or stored, or where it should be collected or stored. The document could still specify how information should be presented, or output, by the tool in terms of format. But what should happen with that output is out of scope. We’ll be discussing these decisions on our next call on October 15th and the agenda has been posted on the work party wiki page. <https://community.icann.org/display/RSSAC/RSSAC+Caucus+Local+Perspective+Too...> We’ll also be asking for volunteers to start turning what we have so far into an RSSAC publication. Thanks, Andrew
Dear RSSAC Caucus Members, For our call today I have prepared a draft outline for our work party document. <https://docs.google.com/document/d/11slZDTqrcwTwywpbi3JwHuU_FoaoN54u0f3B2UFj...> I apologize for not getting this out earlier so folks could review it before the call. Thanks, Andrew
On 9 Oct 2020, at 16:51, Andrew McConachie <andrew.mcconachie@icann.org> wrote:
Dear RSSAC Caucus Members,
Myself, Ozan, Abdulkarim and Ken had a call on Monday to discuss the RSSAC Caucus Local Perspective Tool Work Party. We discussed the narratives and agree to merge narratives #5 and #7 in the document, and to delete narrative #6 as it falls within the scope of the Rogue RSO Work Party. I’ve updated the narratives document to suggest these changes.
User Narratives Google Document <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1enH6LjICyAbKVr7ssps_4KapecRAROK0nZrw2ihS...>
Another thing we provisionally decided was that it would be out of scope for the work party to define how data should be collected or stored, or where it should be collected or stored. The document could still specify how information should be presented, or output, by the tool in terms of format. But what should happen with that output is out of scope.
We’ll be discussing these decisions on our next call on October 15th and the agenda has been posted on the work party wiki page. <https://community.icann.org/display/RSSAC/RSSAC+Caucus+Local+Perspective+Too...>
We’ll also be asking for volunteers to start turning what we have so far into an RSSAC publication.
Thanks, Andrew_______________________________________________ rssac-caucus mailing list rssac-caucus@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rssac-caucus
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (1)
-
Andrew McConachie