[rssac-caucus] 48 HOUR LAST CALL: DRAFT Final Report on Root zone TTLs
Dear RSSAC caucus, Thank you again for your feedback on the TTL document. The Caucus work working group (along with a few caucus members) met at IETF 93 today and finalized the document. In the attached final document, a few changes are made: 1) recommendations are updated based on the additional feedback and work party discussions. The rationale is documented at the end of section 6.4.4. 2) added text to indicate that this is not an urgent problem to be fixed, and that the issue to be addressed within a reasonable amount of time following an update of the necessary procedures documents and software testing. 3) additional text to indicate that a new RRSIG record covering the DNSKEY RRset appears in the root zone every ten days, except at the end of calendar quarters where the interval may be extended to 12 days. 4) light-editing through the document (e.g. make recommendations in the executive summary consistent with the recommendations section, etc.) 5) updated acknowledgement section. With this, this document is put to the 48 hour last call for comments period. Please provide your comments by close of business Thursday, 23 July 2015. Following the last call, the documents will be copy-edited and sent to RSSAC for formal action. Best, Steve
Dear RSSAC Caucus, Given that there are no further comments on this document. The report on Root Zone TTLs is finalized. The document will be copy-edited and sent to RSSAC for formal action. Best, Steve From: <rssac-caucus-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Steve Sheng <steve.sheng@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 6:00 PM To: "rssac-caucus@icann.org" <rssac-caucus@icann.org> Subject: [rssac-caucus] 48 HOUR LAST CALL: DRAFT Final Report on Root zone TTLs
Dear RSSAC caucus,
Thank you again for your feedback on the TTL document. The Caucus work working group (along with a few caucus members) met at IETF 93 today and finalized the document.
In the attached final document, a few changes are made:
1) recommendations are updated based on the additional feedback and work party discussions. The rationale is documented at the end of section 6.4.4.
2) added text to indicate that this is not an urgent problem to be fixed, and that the issue to be addressed within a reasonable amount of time following an update of the necessary procedures documents and software testing.
3) additional text to indicate that a new RRSIG record covering the DNSKEY RRset appears in the root zone every ten days, except at the end of calendar quarters where the interval may be extended to 12 days.
4) light-editing through the document (e.g. make recommendations in the executive summary consistent with the recommendations section, etc.)
5) updated acknowledgement section.
With this, this document is put to the 48 hour last call for comments period. Please provide your comments by close of business Thursday, 23 July 2015. Following the last call, the documents will be copy-edited and sent to RSSAC for formal action.
Best, Steve
Steve Sheng writes:
Given that there are no further comments on this document. The report on Root Zone TTLs is finalized. The document will be copy-edited and sent to RSSAC for formal action.
Just to make it explicit, I have read the document and think it is good as-is.
I'm checking in to see what the status is here... Was this shipped over to RRSAC? When do we hear back? etc. W On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Steve Sheng <steve.sheng@icann.org> wrote:
Dear RSSAC Caucus,
Given that there are no further comments on this document. The report on Root Zone TTLs is finalized. The document will be copy-edited and sent to RSSAC for formal action.
Best, Steve
From: <rssac-caucus-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Steve Sheng <steve.sheng@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 6:00 PM To: "rssac-caucus@icann.org" <rssac-caucus@icann.org> Subject: [rssac-caucus] 48 HOUR LAST CALL: DRAFT Final Report on Root zone TTLs
Dear RSSAC caucus,
Thank you again for your feedback on the TTL document. The Caucus work working group (along with a few caucus members) met at IETF 93 today and finalized the document.
In the attached final document, a few changes are made:
1) recommendations are updated based on the additional feedback and work party discussions. The rationale is documented at the end of section 6.4.4.
2) added text to indicate that this is not an urgent problem to be fixed, and that the issue to be addressed within a
reasonable amount of time following an update of the necessary procedures documents and software testing.
3) additional text to indicate that a new RRSIG record covering the DNSKEY RRset appears in the root zone every ten days, except at the end of calendar quarters where the interval may be extended to 12 days.
4) light-editing through the document (e.g. make recommendations in the executive summary consistent with the recommendations section, etc.)
5) updated acknowledgement section.
With this, this document is put to the 48 hour last call for comments period. Please provide your comments by close of business Thursday, 23 July 2015. Following the last call, the documents will be copy-edited and sent to RSSAC for formal action.
Best, Steve
_______________________________________________ rssac-caucus mailing list rssac-caucus@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rssac-caucus
-- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf
Thanks Warren. This report is on the agenda for the 3 September 2015 teleconference. Steve On 8/27/15, 12:55 PM, "Warren Kumari" <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
I'm checking in to see what the status is here... Was this shipped over to RRSAC? When do we hear back? etc.
W
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Steve Sheng <steve.sheng@icann.org> wrote:
Dear RSSAC Caucus,
Given that there are no further comments on this document. The report on Root Zone TTLs is finalized. The document will be copy-edited and sent to RSSAC for formal action.
Best, Steve
From: <rssac-caucus-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Steve Sheng <steve.sheng@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 6:00 PM To: "rssac-caucus@icann.org" <rssac-caucus@icann.org> Subject: [rssac-caucus] 48 HOUR LAST CALL: DRAFT Final Report on Root zone TTLs
Dear RSSAC caucus,
Thank you again for your feedback on the TTL document. The Caucus work working group (along with a few caucus members) met at IETF 93 today and finalized the document.
In the attached final document, a few changes are made:
1) recommendations are updated based on the additional feedback and work party discussions. The rationale is documented at the end of section 6.4.4.
2) added text to indicate that this is not an urgent problem to be fixed, and that the issue to be addressed within a
reasonable amount of time following an update of the necessary procedures documents and software testing.
3) additional text to indicate that a new RRSIG record covering the DNSKEY RRset appears in the root zone every ten days, except at the end of calendar quarters where the interval may be extended to 12 days.
4) light-editing through the document (e.g. make recommendations in the executive summary consistent with the recommendations section, etc.)
5) updated acknowledgement section.
With this, this document is put to the 48 hour last call for comments period. Please provide your comments by close of business Thursday, 23 July 2015. Following the last call, the documents will be copy-edited and sent to RSSAC for formal action.
Best, Steve
_______________________________________________ rssac-caucus mailing list rssac-caucus@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rssac-caucus
-- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Steve Sheng <steve.sheng@icann.org> wrote:
Thanks Warren.
This report is on the agenda for the 3 September 2015 teleconference.
Cool thanks. This somewhat feels like a black hole -- the Caucus WG works on a document for a long time, and polishes it nicely, then it disappears into the "real" RSSAC and we wait, hoping to hear something at some unspecified time in the future... W
Steve
On 8/27/15, 12:55 PM, "Warren Kumari" <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
I'm checking in to see what the status is here... Was this shipped over to RRSAC? When do we hear back? etc.
W
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Steve Sheng <steve.sheng@icann.org> wrote:
Dear RSSAC Caucus,
Given that there are no further comments on this document. The report on Root Zone TTLs is finalized. The document will be copy-edited and sent to RSSAC for formal action.
Best, Steve
From: <rssac-caucus-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Steve Sheng <steve.sheng@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 6:00 PM To: "rssac-caucus@icann.org" <rssac-caucus@icann.org> Subject: [rssac-caucus] 48 HOUR LAST CALL: DRAFT Final Report on Root zone TTLs
Dear RSSAC caucus,
Thank you again for your feedback on the TTL document. The Caucus work working group (along with a few caucus members) met at IETF 93 today and finalized the document.
In the attached final document, a few changes are made:
1) recommendations are updated based on the additional feedback and work party discussions. The rationale is documented at the end of section 6.4.4.
2) added text to indicate that this is not an urgent problem to be fixed, and that the issue to be addressed within a
reasonable amount of time following an update of the necessary procedures documents and software testing.
3) additional text to indicate that a new RRSIG record covering the DNSKEY RRset appears in the root zone every ten days, except at the end of calendar quarters where the interval may be extended to 12 days.
4) light-editing through the document (e.g. make recommendations in the executive summary consistent with the recommendations section, etc.)
5) updated acknowledgement section.
With this, this document is put to the 48 hour last call for comments period. Please provide your comments by close of business Thursday, 23 July 2015. Following the last call, the documents will be copy-edited and sent to RSSAC for formal action.
Best, Steve
_______________________________________________ rssac-caucus mailing list rssac-caucus@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rssac-caucus
-- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf
-- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf
warren@kumari.net:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Steve Sheng <steve.sheng@icann.org> wrote:
Thanks Warren.
This report is on the agenda for the 3 September 2015 teleconference.
Cool thanks.
This somewhat feels like a black hole -- the Caucus WG works on a document for a long time, and polishes it nicely, then it disappears into the "real" RSSAC and we wait, hoping to hear something at some unspecified time in the future...
I found this message, and I realize I should have responded sooner. I spend less time here than I should, as RSSAC admin stuff takes much of my time. See it from the positive side: I fend it off from you so you can discuss the cool stuff. ;-) The document was indeed on the agenda for the Sep 3 RSSAC teleconf and it was unanimously and happily approved for publication without as much as a question. It was sent on a 48-hour notice to ICANN's Board of Directors (as we do - so they can prepare for the barrage of questions from journalists ;-)), and, I must say that I'm positively amazed that it was picked up by Steve Crocker (the chariman of the board) who went on to find a techincal nit in it - one that we've obviously all missed! :-) (Simply the use of the word "average" where the obvious intent was "median".) After confirming with the work party that this was indeed a "typo", this is now being addressed before publication, but the doc will go out Real Soon Now(TM). The document has received quite appreciative words from the people who have seen it thus far as a thorough work of high quality, and I can only concur. I would hereby like to extend my warmest thanks to those involved in creating it. I'm impressed by the quality and timeliness by which is was produced. It is well and much appreciated. Thanks to Duane for running the work party, and to Joe, Jaap, John B, Brian, Shumon, Warren, Daniel M, Shinta, and Matthew for contributing your time and expertise, and, of course, to our ICANN staff support Kathy, Steve S, and Barbara for helping to create this document! If there is someone I've missed, I apologize, and if so, you should feel warmly included in my thanks. Best regards, /Liman RSSAC co-chair #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # Lars-Johan Liman, M.Sc. ! E-mail: liman@netnod.se # Senior Systems Specialist ! Tel: +46 8 - 562 860 12 # Netnod Internet Exchange, Stockholm ! http://www.netnod.se/ #----------------------------------------------------------------------
participants (4)
-
Dave Lawrence -
Lars-Johan Liman -
Steve Sheng -
Warren Kumari