Re: [RSSAC Caucus] Updating the RSSAC FAQ
What's not clear to me Fred is whether “many MORE” resolvers today are capable of falling back to TCP.
On 2 May 2020, at 9:20 am, Fred Baker <fredbakersba@gmail.com> wrote:
Question: I understood the statement to be that *resolvers* could fall back to TCP, not that the universe behind solvers could. Which is it?
On May 1, 2020, at 1:22 PM, Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> wrote:
On 2 May 2020, at 1:25 am, Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org> wrote:
Geoff Huston writes:
"Finally, many more resolvers today are capable of falling back to TCP when they receive a truncated response over UDP”
really? Where is the study that publishes this finding?
On Saturday, 2 May 2020 00:04:50 UTC Geoff Huston wrote:
What's not clear to me Fred is whether “many MORE” resolvers today are capable of falling back to TCP.
it would help our field quite a lot if noone used the word "resolver" without introduction. so, either "stub resolver" or "full resolver". -- Paul
participants (2)
-
Geoff Huston -
Paul Vixie